DrW wrote:The following facts concerning the problems with religion in Iran were the basis for my question. Anyone who pays attention to the news or reads about politics or world history now and then should know at least some of this. Apparently you do do not.
• Iran is a theocracy that mixes religion and state more thoroughly than any other country in the world.
• Shiite Islam (the dominant form of Islam in Iran) gives a special place to its clerics and demands blind obedience to their rulings on religious law.
• Since 1979, the Islamic Republic has imposed a strongly patriarchal order.
• The contemporary Shiite revival has given Iran influence in the Muslim world and especially among other Shiite communities in the Arab world and South Asia, challenging the Sunni secular nationalists and traditional monarchies.
Iran is clearly not a country that one should be proud of overtaking in terms of religiosity. Apparently the fact that Americans are slightly more religious than Iranians is a point of pride for you. Think about it.
Last time I was in Tehran, the taxi in which I was riding was stopped at a checkpoint near the airport at night. Two bright lights came on from the floor behind the front seat. They were mounted so as to point up into the rear passenger's face so that the passenger was essentially blind to anything outside the cab. The muzzle of an automatic weapon was thrust through the rear window and I was ordered to show my passport and visa to someone I could not even see. One small example of Iranian theocracy at work.
So, what is your point? The evidence form the OP simply can easily be concluded as proving that freedom from the ills that you seem to list for Iran could be alleviated by being "more religious"...since America is being viewed as more religious than Iran it would appear that the problem is that Iran is not religious enough.
Otherwise it is obvious that you simply want to insert more anecdotes, as some sort of appeal to authority, about you being in Iran in lieu of actually understanding the references you posted....ironic.
DrW wrote:If you are referring to Ludwig, he is Hungarian, not Belgian (although I am not surprised that you appear not to know the difference).
its more likely that i do not care, or that it was intentional since he has done little to be humble about being Hungarian.
DrW wrote:Turns out that Ludwig and I share a number of common experiences. Both of us served in the military during the Cold War era. Both of us have worked professionally in physics and engineering (and specifically with microwaves and electromagnetic field phenomenon). Both of us apparently think a lot of Hungarians (an attitude based on long experience).
congratulations, you make a lovely couple
DrW wrote:If you think Ludwig is a dilettante, I would suggest that you have this miss-perception because you do not have a clue as to what he actually knows and understands.
this forum has an abundance of clues, he is no doubt well read across a variety of authors and subject, has a vast life experience both professionally and personally and appreciates everything he offers....of which is primarily unoriginal in as much as it usually authored by another...which is why he has made exhaustive postings about not being able to post his favorite cartoons....obviously a crippling burden to his ability to "express" himself....wherever i got the notion of "dilettante" must surely be baffling.
DrW wrote:Try to imagine what the average Hungarian would think about you and your demonstrably bizarre Mormon-based worldview if you tried to describe or explain it on a Hungarian language message board. Your apparent dislike of English language sentence structure, failure to capitalize, etc., don't reflect well on your efforts in your own native language. You can bet that Ludwig writes better in Hungarian (and perhaps even in German or Russian), than you do on this board in English.
i suggest you Google "grammar nazi".
Actually, i take the same position as Ludwig....just as he has admitted, i only read the first sentence of a post and then i decide everything else about the poster and the post from that...wait...no, i don't do that...my myopia is only afflicting my eyesight.
So, considering that your above listed "problems" are not occurring in America... exactly how do you explain your original statement of there being a "problem" with America being more religious than Iran? The evidence of "world history" seems to point to the only "problem(s)" being in Iran not America.
Got an actual clarification as to what the "problem" is with America being "more religious" than Iran?
Are you concerned that if we become less religious we will become more like Iran???
(and as far as getting on Hungarian forums ,blah blah...i am afraid i no little about the Rovas alphabet and besides...
https://www.LDS.org/ensign/1990/06/the- ... w?lang=eng )