Russell Nelson has lost his sight.

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 4268
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: Russell Nelson has lost his sight.

Post by I Have Questions »

As I understand it, if the longest serving Apostle is unable to serve as President following the job becoming vacant by the incumbant’s death, then it would fall to the President of the Q12 to preside until such a time as the next in line becomes able to serve, dies, or is ruled never likely to recover.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Marcus
God
Posts: 8039
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: Russell Nelson has lost his sight.

Post by Marcus »

I Have Questions wrote:
Fri Sep 26, 2025 7:53 pm
Gents, as you know I am afflicted with incurable inquisitiveness...
Us ladies know it too!
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 4268
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: Russell Nelson has lost his sight.

Post by I Have Questions »

Marcus wrote:
Sun Sep 28, 2025 2:37 pm
I Have Questions wrote:
Fri Sep 26, 2025 7:53 pm
Gents, as you know I am afflicted with incurable inquisitiveness...
Us ladies know it too!
:lol: to ensure the avoidance of any perceived sexism on my part (if any exists) I meant “Gents” as a reference to Tom and Everybody Wang Chung rather than the board in general.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Marcus
God
Posts: 8039
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: Russell Nelson has lost his sight.

Post by Marcus »

I Have Questions wrote:
Tue Sep 30, 2025 1:46 pm
Marcus wrote:
Sun Sep 28, 2025 2:37 pm
Us ladies know it too!
:lol: to ensure the avoidance of any perceived sexism on my part (if any exists) I meant “Gents” as a reference to Tom and Everybody Wang Chung rather than the board in general.
Thanks for explaining, I didn't realize you were speaking only to them with that part!
Post Reply