Most of these cases are tried under liberal judges and juries are pulled from areas where the population is 96% Democrat. Of course it won't go far. That doesn't change the fact that SPLC is not the FBI and has no right to pay informants. It certainly has no right to fund the few idiotic Klansmen who are left to encourage them to do something stupid because there's just not enough actual racism out there to get black men angry enough at white people to get them back on the Democrat plantation and voting for their own enslavement to the feminists in the family court system. Nor to vote for their own replacement by 3rd world immigrants who will work for less. Racial division has always benefited the left, not the right.
Ajax, I do not know how much family court would be democrate .I think Republicans have supported child support obligations and a legal lean towards mothers. Women are in both parties.
I live in the half of Washington state which is very Republican. It naturally is the agricultural half with fruit and other crops needing seasonal labor. For many decades much of that labor travels north from across the border. Different decades past have had different legal arrangement. Not all of the labor was legal but the republican growers were glad to get crops picked. It is not some conspiracy of liberals.
Labor traveling north across the southern boarder has been going on for over a century. What in the world plantation for blacks are you thinking of? Welfare? Why would Democrats want to keep blacks on welfare? There are plenty of whites there already. Actually Democrats hope welfare recipients find jobs and stop receiving welfare benefits. The money could be used better and work is an important good for people.
Labor traveling north across the southern border has been going on for over a century right alongside the rise of the welfare state full of an ever growing number of American citizens who just can't find a job anywhere.
Trump got more black votes than any Republican before him. He also got more Latino votes, especially working Latino men. Perhaps people coming into the country to work were never the problem nor would US voters be opposed to accepting working, skilled immigrants. But that's not really what's happening. There's a group of criminals and refugees who are initially rejected to immigrate to the US. They have no skills nor any intention to come make a living through honest labor. Honest labor is difficult. They prefer to make their money through sex trafficking, drug sales, etc. The fact is that if a pregnant illegal immigrant gets one foot on US soil, she's immediately rushed to a US hospital for free labor and delivery (how much does it cost working people to have a baby?), free childcare, medicaid, housing, public school, etc. She'll never work nor does she have any skills. Next she'll bring her parents, and her cousins to come collect social security or SSI disability through chain migration. You're not just stuck paying for these people for the next 18 years. This is cradle to grave welfare for an unlimited number of them forever with no politician in the last 100 years willing to stand up for the American taxpayer and actually put a stop to it before Donald J Trump. Why would working people in the US accept this lieflong burden? They don't. But the fact is that you don't have to hold a job, pay taxes, or become self sufficient to vote Democrat. And that's all Democrat politicians really want or need.
And when the Confederates saw Jackson standing fearless like a stonewall, the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
Remember when Ajax pretended to think Lawfare was bad? Good times!
"He disturbs the laws of his country, he forces himself upon women, and he puts men to death without trial.” ~Otanes on the monarch, Herodotus Histories 3.80.
I see plenty of supply. College Republican and ToiletPaperUSA chats full of hateful bigotry and jokes about killing minorities. No lack of supply!
"He disturbs the laws of his country, he forces himself upon women, and he puts men to death without trial.” ~Otanes on the monarch, Herodotus Histories 3.80.
.... Perhaps people coming into the country to work were never the problem nor would US voters be opposed to accepting working, skilled immigrants. But that's not really what's happening. ...
It would certainly be a bad thing if immigrants to the USA were simply coming to live on welfare. But when I decided to have a look at the figures, I found that, for instance 70% of them were employed, as opposed to only 65.9% of the native population. And so on, and so forth. Funnily enough, the kind of people with the drive and energy to get to the USA illegally (It's not easy) do not do it in order to sit on their backsides, but are desperate to work and make money for themselves and family back home.
Try this site for lots of interesting data, for instance:
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Mayan Elephant:
Not only have I denounced the Big Lie, I have denounced the Big lie big lie.
I found that, for instance 70% of them were employed, as opposed to only 65.9%
And that right there is one of the biggest problems. Why do we need immigrants to pick our fruit when so many Americans just can't get a job? And how many of those immigrants will choose to work for less once they get their citizenship/green card/ or whatever it takes to get on welfare or disability? How motivated are 1st generation American immigrants to work compared to their parents? How many of them have chosen to live on welfare or become career criminals rather than work the lettuce fields as their parents did?
Last edited by ajax18 on Mon Apr 27, 2026 12:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
And when the Confederates saw Jackson standing fearless like a stonewall, the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
I see plenty of supply. College Republican and ToiletPaperUSA chats full of hateful bigotry and jokes about killing minorities. No lack of supply!
So why do you need to spend such a high percentage of your income donating to the SPLC to pay money to prop up dying and irrelevant groups like the Ku Klux Klan? Racism is a tool used by the left to divide the responsible working people of all races. Thankfully enough working minorities began to understand that enough that they left the Democrat plantation and voted for Donald Trump in greater numbers than any Republican candidate before him. I'm starting to see more and more black and brown men rejecting the words of the Reverend Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and Barack Obama. They understand the divide is between workers and moochers not black and white. I give them a lot of credit for being able to break out of the mentality inculcated in them from their youth that they can never become self reliant and competitive in the job market because of white men and therefore must rely on politicians who promise to confiscate and redistribute white men's salaries because they're just not capable of ever earning it themselves. In exchange for their vote, a proportionally few politicians like Barack Obama became extremely wealthy, while 99% of the people of color remained in poverty. Black and brown men started to see this happening in their lives in real time and to their credit they had enough confidence in themselves and their abilities to say to the Marxist race grifters, "No thank you. We don't want your money with strings attached. We'll provide for ourselves and keep our freedom." Far too many of them never broke the devils chains in this regard, but enough of them did to put Donald Trump back in office.
And when the Confederates saw Jackson standing fearless like a stonewall, the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
So why do you need to spend such a high percentage of your income donating to the SPLC to pay money to prop up dying and irrelevant groups like the Ku Klux Klan?
1. You don’t actually believe that the SPLC was ‘propping up’ the KKK (how? were they supplying all of the refreshments for the monthly meetings?) any more than you believe that narcotics agents in an informant’s role ‘prop up the narcotics trade’.
2. You don’t actually believe that Kish is spending any money donating to the SPLC, let alone at ‘such a high percentage’ of his income. But it would be his choice to spend his income as he wishes. Isn’t it a free market capitalist exercise to donate money to pay for informants to spy on neo-Nazis? I’m not convinced that this actually bothers you any more than what Project Veritas does.
So why do you need to spend such a high percentage of your income donating to the SPLC to pay money to prop up dying and irrelevant groups like the Ku Klux Klan?
1. You don’t actually believe that the SPLC was ‘propping up’ the KKK (how? were they supplying all of the refreshments for the monthly meetings?) any more than you believe that narcotics agents in an informant’s role ‘prop up the narcotics trade’.
2. You don’t actually believe that Kish is spending any money donating to the SPLC, let alone at ‘such a high percentage’ of his income. But it would be his choice to spend his income as he wishes. Isn’t it a free market capitalist exercise to donate money to pay for informants to spy on neo-Nazis? I’m not convinced that this actually bothers you any more than what Project Veritas does.
Like the Republican Party, Ajax has abandoned all pretense of consistency. He can’t be a hypocrite because he’s on the right side. He’s on the right side because Trump says he is. He’d genuinely love Big Brother.
he/him
“I prefer peace. But if trouble must come, let it come in my time so that my children can live in peace.” — Thomas Paine
1. You don’t actually believe that the SPLC was ‘propping up’ the KKK (how? were they supplying all of the refreshments for the monthly meetings?) any more than you believe that narcotics agents in an informant’s role ‘prop up the narcotics trade’.
2. You don’t actually believe that Kish is spending any money donating to the SPLC, let alone at ‘such a high percentage’ of his income. But it would be his choice to spend his income as he wishes. Isn’t it a free market capitalist exercise to donate money to pay for informants to spy on neo-Nazis? I’m not convinced that this actually bothers you any more than what Project Veritas does.
Like the Republican Party, Ajax has abandoned all pretense of consistency. He can’t be a hypocrite because he’s on the right side. He’s on the right side because Trump says he is. He’d genuinely love Big Brother.
Well of course. I love Donald Trump. He's a modern day George Washington.
And when the Confederates saw Jackson standing fearless like a stonewall, the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
