Mister Scratch wrote:Give me a break, Ray. One tiny update on 11/14/2007 hardly counts as "major activity." They update the site very seldom. It is practically defunct.
You could say the same for Infymus' site, but I doubt he'd say his site was "defunct". My real blog (not the one here) is now also "practically defunct" (to use your term), but it is going to be revived, albeit in a different form. Defunct sites don't offer updates - at all.
Ray, you would be better off just conceding the point.
By the way, after seriously thinking things over, and after having carefully weighed your posting style over in my mind, I have decided that it would be very, very foolish indeed to reveal anything about myself to you, of all people. You are far, far too volatile and knuckle-headed. Very basic points sail right over your head, and moreover, you have openly declared your own violent tendencies, and have admitted that you would use whatever I told you as a means of disparaging and attacking me. So: sorry, mate, but I won't be telling you anything. Carry on!
Mister Scratch wrote: By the way, after seriously thinking things over, and after having carefully weighed your posting style over in my mind, I have decided that it would be very, very foolish indeed to reveal anything about myself to you, of all people. You are far, far too volatile and knuckle-headed. Very basic points sail right over your head, and moreover, you have openly declared your own violent tendencies, and have admitted that you would use whatever I told you as a means of disparaging and attacking me. So: sorry, mate, but I won't be telling you anything. Carry on!
Which, of course, you don't do to others? This is exactly what I said before, you want to scrutinise everyone, including using personal emails to reveal information, to disparage and attack them - but you must remain incognito, and as little as possible known about you, so others can't scrutinise you.
Don't worry, I don't really need to do anything - karma will hit you in the backside before you even know it.
Mister Scratch wrote: By the way, after seriously thinking things over, and after having carefully weighed your posting style over in my mind, I have decided that it would be very, very foolish indeed to reveal anything about myself to you, of all people. You are far, far too volatile and knuckle-headed. Very basic points sail right over your head, and moreover, you have openly declared your own violent tendencies, and have admitted that you would use whatever I told you as a means of disparaging and attacking me. So: sorry, mate, but I won't be telling you anything. Carry on!
Which, of course, you don't do to others?
I certainly don't request information from them which they haven't volunteered, as you creepily continue to do.
This is exactly what I said before, you want to scrutinise everyone, including using personal emails
As already pointed out, your beloved Prof. P. is guilty of this, too. Your hypocrisy is showing, mate.
to reveal information, to disparage and attack them - but you must remain incognito, and as little as possible known about you, so others can't scrutinise you.
Go ahead and "scrutinise" my posts, mate. Go ahead and "scrutinise" my emails to you, or my PMs.
Don't worry, I don't really need to do anything - karma will hit you in the backside before you even know it.
Right. And you will wildly flip-flop again one day.
Mister Scratch wrote:Go ahead and "scrutinise" my posts, mate. Go ahead and "scrutinise" my emails to you, or my PMs.
You did once offer to PM me, maybe you forget. With the intention of trying to win me to your POV, perhaps?
Mister Scratch wrote:Right. And you will wildly flip-flop again one day.
With snarky wolves like you on the hunt, I would not even consider it. You are nothing but an egregious gripe looking for a wall to spit on.
I'm not sure what it is about me in particular that you hate so much, Ray, but I will note that you've failed to show just why my cautious anonymity is such a huge problem for you. I'm sure that one of these days you will supply a real argument, but in the meantime, I reckon that all I can do is shake my head in dismay.
Mister Scratch wrote: I'm not sure what it is about me in particular that you hate so much, Ray, but I will note that you've failed to show just why my cautious anonymity is such a huge problem for you. I'm sure that one of these days you will supply a real argument, but in the meantime, I reckon that all I can do is shake my head in dismay.
I don't hate you, I just think your obsession with analysing of others motives, and making character judgments of other people, especially your obsession with DCP, is unhealthy. You have basically called the man "corrupt" and "evil". Why? Where is your evidence for this?
And all this behind your cowardly facade of anonymity. If you published in a newspaper what you write here, you would be sued for libel. The problem is it wouldn't get past any editor. Do you think a newspaper editor would even consider publishing such defamation of character, and publish it under "name withheld"?
Mister Scratch wrote: I'm not sure what it is about me in particular that you hate so much, Ray, but I will note that you've failed to show just why my cautious anonymity is such a huge problem for you. I'm sure that one of these days you will supply a real argument, but in the meantime, I reckon that all I can do is shake my head in dismay.
I don't hate you, I just think your obsession with analysing of others motives, and making character judgments of other people, especially your obsession with DCP, is unhealthy. You have basically called the man "corrupt" and "evil". Why? Where is your evidence for this?
On my blog, and in my posts. Unlike you, my dear Ray, I actually offer up quotes in order to support my positions. I'm not sure where I referred to Prof. P. as "corrupt," but certainly his smear campaign against Mike Quinn, coupled with his manipulation of peer review, his gossiping, and his use of the "Free Thinker" moniker would seem to paint a picture of at least mild "corruption." As for "evil," I know that I recently referred to his "evils," and again, these would include things like his "Free Thinker" dishonesty, his smears, his sanction of attack pieces in FROB, etc., etc. I have beaucoup evidence, Ray. It's all there on my blog. The fact that you overlook these many things, and somehow think I am worse merely due to 'anonymity' is a striking illustration of your hatred and hypocrisy.