Why do you post here?

Post by **_Some Schmo** » Fri Aug 24, 2007 5:04 pm

Runtu wrote: Which one are you, Bob?

Ah, he forgot one on his list:

7. The stereotyping dumbass that everyone points their finger at and laughs.

There you go, crock. Wouldn't want to forget a category for you, now would we?

Post by **_Blixa** » Fri Aug 24, 2007 5:15 pm

Doctor Steuss wrote:
Mercury wrote:I like my ideas tested.

I like my ideas tasted.

Mmmmmm...raspberry!

Post by **_KimberlyAnn** » Fri Aug 24, 2007 5:22 pm

Some Schmo wrote:
Runtu wrote: Which one are you, Bob?

Ah, he forgot one on his list:

7. The stereotyping dumbass that everyone points their finger at and laughs.

There you go, crock. Wouldn't want to forget a category for you, now would we?

I think Bob has a Napoleon complex. I bet he's a tiny man with a tiny d*ck. You know the kind - they drive huge trucks and talk a big game to compensate for their lack of largeness in other areas.

The way he acts all tough on the board, I bet he's so small that I could kick his ass!

How big a boy are ya Crock?

KA

_rcrocket · Post by **_rcrocket** » Fri Aug 24, 2007 5:37 pm

KimberlyAnn wrote:The way he acts all tough on the board, I bet he's so small that I could kick his ass!

How big a boy are ya Crock?

KA

I'm sure you could. I don't admire your posts. You are rather vacuous, and that is why I don't really correspond with you.

But, to answer your questions, I am a husband of 30 years and a father. I am (or was, a few months ago) an elite-status ultrathoner (http://www.buffalorun.org/2007_50.html). My status has slipped as I have migrated back to a bicycle. I am admitted to the Supreme Court of the United States and have been there (on paper) several times. I am published in my field and outside my field. Yes, I own trucks, but they are his and her old Toyota Landcruisers to transport more children than will fit in one.

Oh, and I am taller than 6 feet and weigh more than 200.

rcrocket

_rcrocket · Post by **_rcrocket** » Fri Aug 24, 2007 5:38 pm

Blixa wrote:which category do you put yourself in crockett?

Category 1, I think.

rcrocket

Post by **_Rollo Tomasi** » Fri Aug 24, 2007 5:42 pm

rcrocket wrote:They are hypocrites ... They are cowards ... They are uneducated ... ill-read, shallowly-read ... can't put together coherent sentences ... They are hedonists ... They are depressed ... They contribute little to nothing to society -- no good works, simply very self-centered and self-focused ... They are poseurs ... The smug, the self-righteous ... The dillettante ... The mean, the malicious, the combatant.

You are one angry dude. Get help.

_rcrocket · Post by **_rcrocket** » Fri Aug 24, 2007 5:42 pm

harmony wrote:Gee, Crock. You hate everyone.

Hatred is the wrong term here. I point my own fingers, for the weakness and wrongness of their position, at the the hypocrite, the coward, the ill-read and the vulgar. The engagement and entertainment is my reason for being here. But, it is impossible by definition to hate the anonymous. I think that anybody on this board who is not anonymous (or whom I can ascertain by easy diligence) I have lots of respect for as persons whatever position they advance.

rcrocket

_rcrocket · Post by **_rcrocket** » Fri Aug 24, 2007 5:43 pm

Rollo Tomasi wrote:
rcrocket wrote:They are hypocrites ... They are cowards ... They are uneducated ... ill-read, shallowly-read ... can't put together coherent sentences ... They are hedonists ... They are depressed ... They contribute little to nothing to society -- no good works, simply very self-centered and self-focused ... They are poseurs ... The smug, the self-righteous ... The dillettante ... The mean, the malicious, the combatant.

You are one angry dude. Get help.

Hmm, or maybe too deeply tongue in cheek perhaps? Certainly for this crowd.

OK. That's enough. -- F[alse]MODS

I will consult my therapist about your comments. She is always telling me to be more assertive.

rcrocket

Post by **_KimberlyAnn** » Fri Aug 24, 2007 5:50 pm

rcrocket wrote: You are rather vacuous, and that is why I don't really correspond with you.

Well, I count your not corresponding with me a blessing, as I also count Wade's vow to cease his inane psycho-babble which he has previously (and continually) directed at me.

Although you claim you don't suffer from a Napoleon complex, I'm sure you have psychological issues with which Wade could assist you, since he's not busy with me anymore!

KA

Post by **_Gadianton** » Fri Aug 24, 2007 5:52 pm

ok, I'll admit I'm a #4.

(#4 is also a double quarter-pounder meal at McDonalds and I usually get that if I go there)