Daniel Peterson wrote:"Massive"? "Sneaking"?
A "mysterious" and "clandestine" fundraiser?
LOL.
Go ahead and yuk it up. In the meantime, feel free to show where you've mentioned this stuff on the MADboard. You often claim to be heading out for "firesides" or whatever else, but the full truth is that you are also out doing "Missionary Work" for Mopologetics.
Yes, and what's even more intriguing is the fact that they apparently pay to fly DCP and this mysterious "fundraiser" out to various parts of the country in order to try and drum up donations. I have a dear friend who has worked for many years in university fundraising, and this sort of thing seems rather atypical.
Sending fundraisers out accompanied by deans, department chairs, or selected others who are judged useful is absolutely par for the
course in university fundraising.
Intriguing. Please tell me: In what way does BYU/the Church judge Mopologetics to be "useful"?
And no, the Church does not pay for the paper for books, nor for their printing, nor for their binding, etc. The Church also didn't pay anything toward the filming, editing, etc., of the two Journey of Faith films. Nor has the Church paid for the Dead Sea Scrolls database that we've produced and on which we continue to work. And the Church doesn't pay for web design or book design, either.
Right. Just like "the Church" didn't "pay" for the Mark Hoffman documents. The Brethren have developed a rather clever way to avoid accountability.
We have to raise money for the Middle Eastern Texts Initiatve (METI), for our digitizing activities in Petra, the Vatican, Guatemala, Herculaneum, etc. The Church doesn't pay the salary of my full-time METI managing editor, either.
So, yes, I'm sometimes involved in fundraising.
The OP wasn't really about you so much (although you have tried rather strenuously to yank the attention back onto you); rather, it was about this mysterious "fund-raiser", and the fact that Matt Roper is a paid LDS apologist. Who else gets paid? Would you care to tell? Or is that information too "sensitive"? Also, is this clandestine "fund-raiser" paid by either BYU or the Church?
And, yes, I'm a paid Mopologist hack. I've made $50-100 in exceptionally lucrative years.
C'mon. You know that's not true. Part of your payment for Mopology comes from your salary, and you make money from your books. No one hear (as far as I know) is claiming that you do Mopologetics purely for money. I think most of us just disapprove of the long-perpetuated myth that you guys were doing it all as a volunteer effort.
In the end, I believe this constitutes yet another bit of evidence that the Church is paying for apologetics.
Oh yes indeed. The fact that the Maxwell Institute seeks donations from private persons and private foundations demonstrates beyond question that the Church is paying for apologetics.
Impeccable reasoning.
See my above comment re: the Mark Hoffman documents.
Of course, it is happening in the sneaking, "end around" way that we witnessed during the Mark Hoffman episode
Vintage Scratch malarky.
[/quote]
It has happened before. And you haven't been entirely forthright about the connection/relationship between apologetics and the Church. Why, for example, would the FP revise its statement on the Hill Cumorah in order to suit your and Hamblin's pet theory? Something is being kept in the dark here. Let the light of truth shine!