Does Uncle Dale Receive Special Protection Here?

[_Ray A]

Ray---

Considering the fact that Brent appears to be posting on the Book of Mormon thread again, I would say that your point is rather moot:

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=8100&p=219892#p219892

Yes, Liz, and maybe because I called marg on her awful bias?

[_Yoda]

But the real point of this is that MDB is becoming as agenda-ridden as MAD.

BS.

You may not ban, you only want to censor whole posts because of ONE sentence.

What has been censored? Moving posts to a different thread is different than censoring them.

The Off Topic Book of Mormon Thread is not some sort of punishment. It was designed to handle off-shoot topics that aren't directly related to the original topic at hand.

[_Jersey Girl]

Ray---

Considering the fact that Brent appears to be posting on the Book of Mormon thread again, I would say that your point is rather moot:

http://mormondiscussions.com/phpBB3/vie ... 92#p219892

Yes, Liz, and maybe because I called marg on her awful bias?

Maybe all of this is because she's frustrating you on the Pearl Curran thread and you're choosing to post falsehoods and incomplete information to alleviate your frustration.

[_Ray A]

But the real point of this is that MDB is becoming as agenda-ridden as MAD.

b***s***.

I don't think you know Shades very well.

[_harmony]

Yes, Liz, and maybe because I called marg on her awful bias?

And how would he know that, if he was avoiding the place?

[_Ray A]

Maybe all of this is because she's frustrating you on the Pearl Curran thread and you're choosing to post falsehoods and incomplete information to alleviate your frustration.

I'll recomend that theory to Mensa.

[_Jersey Girl]

Maybe all of this is because she's frustrating you on the Pearl Curran thread and you're choosing to post falsehoods and incomplete information to alleviate your frustration.

I'll recomend that theory to Mensa.

I recommend any one read the Pearl Curran thread and judge for themselves.

On this thread you posted that marg was assigned to moderate the pinned thread.

False.

You further posted only Brent's posts to marg and failed to post her responses to him.

Incomplete information or shall we say, biased reporting?

Any questions?

[_Ray A]

Yes, Liz, and maybe because I called marg on her awful bias?

And how would he know that, if he was avoiding the place?

Read the quotes I initially posted from Brent. Did he not see both Jersey Girl and marg as significant influencers of the direction that this debate would take?

It's almost "Morg-like".

[_Yoda]

Ray--

My question to you is this.

It appears that the Book of Mormon Thread is back on track again. All infractions of ad hom that we are aware of have been taken care of.

What else do you want done?

What is it that you hope to gain by pushing what, in my opinion, is a dead issue?

[_Brent Metcalfe]

Hi liz3564,

Since I just barely posted my messages, your castigation of Ray is a tad premature, if not uncharitable.

That said, marg has clearly conceded that her moderation of the thread in question is overtly biased—period.

Cheers,

</brent>


http://mormonscripturestudies.com
(© 2009 Brent Lee Metcalfe. All rights reserved.)
——————————
The thesis of inspiration may not be invoked to guarantee historicity, for a divinely inspired story is not necessarily history.
—Raymond E. Brown