Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 13426
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm
Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments
You are still blaming others Nehor and not taking responsibility for your own apelike behavior.
42
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 21373
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm
Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments
Themis wrote:You are still blaming others Nehor and not taking responsibility for your own apelike behavior.
Don't expect that to change anytime soon.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments
The Nehor wrote:Are you under the impression that most of the critics here engage defenders of the faith in rational argument when presented with the opportunity?
I am under no such impression. Usually all I see here is whining about LDS apologetics, and "how come the church hates linux" threads.
Honestly I think Liz picked me because she has been around long enough to remember when I tried to hold real discussions. I'd say something and get flippant responses from Schmo and Merc, an insulting pic from Infymus, a straight insult from Porter, and your standard Scratch derail trying to make it about the people involved.
I wasn't here then, but things haven't changed with the posters mentioned.
So I stopped. The way to win here is cheap word-games, dragging out old posts to discredit your opponent, and flippancy.
So true. Welcome to Simon Belmont's QoM.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 8381
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:45 pm
Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments
asbestosman wrote:moksha wrote:How about a thread on which apologist has the best butt?
Wade has my vote.
And that's why you've got mine!
From the Ernest L. Wilkinson Diaries: "ELW dreams he's spattered w/ grease. Hundreds steal his greasy pants."
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 13426
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm
Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments
Simon Belmont wrote:
I am under no such impression. Usually all I see here is whining about LDS apologetics, and "how come the church hates linux" threads.
I see many of your own threads which are on the same level, and I notice like Nehor you avoid the substantive ones that talk about LDS issues. You are a part of the problem.
42
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 11832
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am
Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments
Themis wrote:You are still blaming others Nehor and not taking responsibility for your own apelike behavior.
What blame? I'm not ashamed of anything I've said or done here so why would I need to blame anyone? I'm explaining why I behave in a certain way here. It's because I choose to. I feel no guilt about it.
I won't win this award and I wasn't trying for it here either. Many of my comments here are shallow. To quote a TV character though: "At least there is symmetry."
When I want real discussion I can (and do) go elsewhere.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 13426
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm
Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments
The Nehor wrote:
What blame? I'm not ashamed of anything I've said or done here so why would I need to blame anyone? I'm explaining why I behave in a certain way here. It's because I choose to. I feel no guilt about it.
You blamed others for your supposed change in posting. I am sure you don't feel any guilt in any apelike behavior on this board.
Many of my comments here are shallow. To quote a TV character though: "At least there is symmetry."
I already know your postings are shallow. :)
When I want real discussion I can (and do) go elsewhere.
I always laugh when people use this excuse for not providing real discussion. Apologists avoid it here because they simply do not have the evidence in their favor on the core LDS issues. That's why they need a board that moderates in their favor. Have fun.
42
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 21373
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm
Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments
The Nehor wrote:When I want real discussion I can (and do) go elsewhere.
We know, Nehor.

"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 7625
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 1:58 am
Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments
I voted for Bokovoy.
I am not certain that he is the "defender that has the best arguments" (perhaps he is?). But I am certain that the manner, respect, compassion, kindness, and humility he freely shares while "arguing" is most admirable and worthy of many ears.
I enjoy his "light".
It has long been my opinion that David represents his chosen faith very very well. (A good and decent man to be sure)
Peace,
Ceeboo
I am not certain that he is the "defender that has the best arguments" (perhaps he is?). But I am certain that the manner, respect, compassion, kindness, and humility he freely shares while "arguing" is most admirable and worthy of many ears.
I enjoy his "light".
It has long been my opinion that David represents his chosen faith very very well. (A good and decent man to be sure)
Peace,
Ceeboo
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 8025
- Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm
Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments
The Nehor wrote:When I want real discussion I can (and do) go elsewhere.
Really? Where?
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14