Is Nemesis a bit ... challenged?

[_Chap]

Latest in from Nemesis:

Dr. Shades joins in the attack and victim blames.

I'm pretty sure that Nemesis himself is the one who's behind them. As he's continued to mentally unravel, it's looking more and more like he's posting them so that he can falsely blame this message board for something.

Keep telling yourself that, I hope its the warm blanket you need at night so you can be comfortable in your own skin. Folks this is all they have, they turn up the heat but can't handle the burn so they victim blame and make up stories to deflect attention from their despicable behavior. If being angry over disgusting attacks on other people makes me mentally unhinged as they so put it, I rather be mentally unhinged if being stable means I lack morals and ethics.


Nemesis

P.S. Eallusion, Asbestman, Runtu, Kevin and those I can't remember thanks for trying to talk some sense into them however your attempts keep getting drowned out by the ridiculousness.

Blaming Nemesis is blaming a victim of nasty memes? Has someone done one of him? No, he is just terminologically confused.

[_asbestosman]

Pahoran should have denounced those words.

I thought he did, though not as loudly as some would like. Pahoran just doesn't think it constitutes misogyny nor a legitimate reason to create a thread dedicated to it, nor for NAMI to pull the plug on Will's paper.

[_TrashcanMan79]

Has someone done one of him?

Actually, there is one of Nemesis: [LINK TO SITE CONTAINING OBSCENE CONTENT DELETED]

[_Chap]

Has someone done one of him?

Actually, there is one of Nemesis: [LINK TO SITE CONTAINING OBSCENE CONTENT DELETED]

God almighty. No wonder he is hurting ...

Never mind: there is light at the end of the tunnel. Soon we shall all be memes, and each individual sense of victimhood will be subsumed into a common humiliation.

Then as we weep on one another's shoulders all shall be reconciled at last ...

Sounds good to me.

[_asbestosman]

Blaming Nemesis is blaming a victim of nasty memes? Has someone done one of him? No, he is just terminologically confused.

Actually, there was one of Nemesis although I haven't followed it. Nemesis has maintained that he's a nobody so the Nemesis memes aren't a concern.

The victims Nemesis is referring to are likely the denizens of MDB in general of which he is a part. Dr. Shades is pointing the finger at Nemesis without evidence--only flimsy suspicions.

With that, may I suggest that we drop the finger-pointing? I've tried to say that it isn't helpful. I don't care if you perceive the other side as doing it. Pointing back at them is dumb even as (or perhaps especially as) a way to take suspicion off of yourself. I don't expect you to give false confessions, but maybe you could look for ways to minimize the chance of it happening in the future? I mentioned elsewhere that deleting references to such memes may go a long way towards discouraging this sort of thing. What's the fun for a troll when he can't watch the reaction to the chaos he just caused? Delete the links to it and discussion of it, and it'd probably put the fire out real quick. Send a PM to the individual so action can be taken if necessary, but there's no reason to stir up the whole board by discussing it.

And to Shades, Nemesis has been talking about more than just the last few weeks. It's not just the memes. Nemesis doesn't need to invent anything--let alone stirring the pot with more mems. Many threads still on this site still present enough fodder for his objections.

[_Chap]

Blaming Nemesis is blaming a victim of nasty memes? Has someone done one of him? No, he is just terminologically confused.

Actually, there was one of Nemesis although I haven't followed it. Nemesis has maintained that he's a nobody so the Nemesis memes aren't a concern.

....

Yup, we already noticed.

I am not sure quite who the rest of your post is addressed to. Shades, not me, I think.

Me, I am fast moving away from outrage and finger-pointing towards LOLZ. And I think that may be a good way out of all this.

[_asbestosman]

I am not sure quite who the rest of your post is addressed to.

To the finger-pointers--the latest one being Shades.

Me, I am fast moving away from outrage and finger-pointing towards LOLZ. And I think that may be a good way out of all this.

That would be nice, but it's hard to view it as LOLZ when we get children involved or put sexual slurs in there. It seems that most of us claimed we didn't find that stuff to be very funny. So, what to do? I don't know. Maybe we can find a way to make it less fun for the troublemakers. I'm guessing that giving it more attention through LOLZ probably wouldn't help much in that regard.

[_beastie]

Oh please.

My pictures are stolen and misused. My family is mocked. My art is mocked. My name is smeared. And if I turn this rock over to squish this maliciousness? Well, I guess I sought it.

I was specifically talking about the misbehavior of the posters you cited, and then excused, not you. I don't know you well enough yet to know what kind of behavior you'll demonstrate. I don't blame you for being upset about the picture incident. As far as mocking your erotica, you brought that on yourself by having a link to it right beside your apologia.

by the way, nonbelievers were treated just as harshly on MAD as believers can be here. I don't follow MDD closely enough to know if that's still the case. Later tonight perhaps I'll hunt up an old thread wherein I listed and linked the barrage of insults I endured on a very brief visit to MAD>

[_Runtu]

The environment influences. by the way when will I see this blog-critique of my work, or have you thought better?

You won't see anything from me. I have no interest in causing more contention and hurt feelings.

[_Themis]

This is really quite simple. If you allow bigots, misogynists, anti-Mromons, and atheists to post to their dark heart's content, what do you really suspect would happen? You get pornography, you get illegal harassment, and the eternal jealousy of the cold man who looks in through the window to the warmth of the spirit.

Could you provide the pornograpy you have seen here. I have not seen any here, and I find it a little hypocritcal of one who openly writes erotica. I was also not aware that athiests had dark hearts. If you want this place to be less toxic you might start with being less toxic yourself. So far I have seen a fair bit from you.

The culture here is toxic. I draws out the worst of people. You get good people like pa pa, William Schryver, and Pahoran over here and before long they bray like the pigs that wallow here. You people taunt and sling crap until one of them snaps and makes a mildly snide remark and they are classified as dirty.

CFR Show us who has been worse then these three. I admit there may be contenders, but these three have not had the worst drawn out of them, but have been major contributers for much of the toxins around here. Stop passing the blame onto others and start behaving better yourself and I think you will see that this place has a lot of good people.