Wisdom Seeker wrote: Okay, I might have stated that incorrectly. I pray that he never becomes critical of the church. For many, I do not mind, but in his particular case, I think it best that he remains very much devoted to defending the faith.
Will has taken a lot of crap on message boards, and this board is no exception to giving him crap. In fact, I do believe that some posters here began to contact the maxwell institute about him and his posts about women.
However, I don't think that he was banned. There is no banning mentioned under avatar as is usually the case when someone is banned on MDD.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world. Joseph Smith We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…” Joseph Smith
Kevin Graham wrote:----- well, ahhhhh, let me seeeeee....I think that the reeeeed lines from the mod might give aaaaaaa clue.
Just as i thought. U can't name any examples. Wades posts have been censored with red just the same but mine aren't generally censored for personal insults. U r talking out of ur ass again
How can I give examples when your posts were cenored by the mods? I just see the mods deleting your more insulting sentences. Maybe that is enough examples.
They rarely ever delete original comments. The last time they said i did an insult it was because i said John Gee "doesn't know what he is talking about."
Wisdom Seeker wrote: Okay, I might have stated that incorrectly. I pray that he never becomes critical of the church. For many, I do not mind, but in his particular case, I think it best that he remains very much devoted to defending the faith.
Will has taken a lot of crap on message boards, and this board is no exception to giving him crap. In fact, I do believe that some posters here began to contact the maxwell institute about him and his posts about women.
However, I don't think that he was banned. There is no banning mentioned under avatar as is usually the when someone is banned on MDD.
William probably banned himself so he could use that as an excuse for ignoring his various refutations i documented
Kevin Graham wrote: They rarely ever delete original comments. The last time they said i did an insult it was because i said John Gee "doesn't know what he is talking about."
I have seen more red than just that. You have been warned repeatedly that your comments and tone need improving. You seem to be getting a mighty free pass over there. And that is just fine. But you tone is usually confrontational with MDD posters. And you know this.
Last edited by Guest on Fri Dec 30, 2011 7:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world. Joseph Smith We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…” Joseph Smith
MsJack wrote:Which posters did this? It certainly wasn't me.
How was his publication squashed?
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world. Joseph Smith We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…” Joseph Smith
I have no idea how the MI became aware of my thread. The only person from the MI whom I know to be a regular reader of this forum is Dan Peterson, and he was pretty dismissive of the concerns that I laid out. I never contacted anyone about my thread or made any attempt to make sure that MI scholars saw it.
That doesn't mean posters at this forum were contacting MI scholars and asking them to consider the thread though. I got plenty of e-mails concerning the thread from people who weren't registered here and had never posted here before, people whom I very much doubt were directly contacted concerning the thread. Word has a funny way of getting around.
"It seems to me that these women were the head (κεφάλαιον) of the church which was at Philippi." ~ John Chrysostom, Homilies on Philippians 13
Wisdom Seeker wrote: Okay, I might have stated that incorrectly. I pray that he never becomes critical of the church. For many, I do not mind, but in his particular case, I think it best that he remains very much devoted to defending the faith.
Amen, brother.
Last edited by Guest on Fri Dec 30, 2011 10:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
The person who is certain and who claims divine warrant for his certainty belongs now to the infancy of our species. Christopher Hitchens
Faith does not give you the answers, it just stops you asking the questions. Frater
wasn't it already established that Brian Hauglid was the main guy behind this? Scratch's informant said so and then days later Hauglid sent Jack an email about it?
Brian has been paying attention to these forums for years but never posts. I had told william months earlier that all his petulant antics would come back to haunt him. I was contacted by several apologists from MAD telling me they were fed up with him. This was a simple case of William losing credibility and respect because of William. No one here "Reported" him to Maxwell.
Kevin Graham wrote: They rarely ever delete original comments. The last time they said i did an insult it was because i said John Gee "doesn't know what he is talking about."
I have seen more red than just that. You have been warned repeatedly that your comments and tone need improving. You seem to be getting a mighty free pass over there. And that is just fine. But you tone is usually confrontational with MDD posters. And you know this.
Produce an example already or admit you are lying. I have said nothing that compares to wade's comments calling me delusiinal- beyond rational input, etc etc. You don't know what u r talking about as usual and have now resorted to lying.