"Your life and family are not ruined"

[_subgenius]

for what it's worth, if this was a left-leaning judicial candidate that had acted this way, I’d come away with exactly the same conclusion.

Ha!
your turning a blind eye to Hillary's tantrum during Benghazi shows that your judgment is staunchly partisan to the Left.

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

for what it's worth, if this was a left-leaning judicial candidate that had acted this way, I’d come away with exactly the same conclusion.

I lean slightly politically ‘right’ as far as Supreme Court picks go.

So, why wouldn't you want to tilt the court to the Right then?

- Doc

ps- The irony, then, is that I'm probably more left-leaning if you use this as any sort of measure:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideolog ... t_justices

[_canpakes]

for what it's worth, if this was a left-leaning judicial candidate that had acted this way, I’d come away with exactly the same conclusion.

Ha!
your turning a blind eye to Hillary's tantrum during Benghazi shows that your judgment is staunchly partisan to the Left.

There you go again, with your comprehension difficulties. Let alone that Hillary wasn’t a candidate for the Supreme Court, so you’re just looking for an excuse to babble on about a Clinton, just like Kavanaugh’s wild-eyed ranting. Those Clintons just twist your britches, don’t they?
; )

But, please continue, and c/p some of her statements that you feel relate to this discussion. Bonus points if you include whatever commentary I had about them at the time.

[_canpakes]

for what it's worth, if this was a left-leaning judicial candidate that had acted this way, I’d come away with exactly the same conclusion.

I lean slightly politically ‘right’ as far as Supreme Court picks go.

So, why wouldn't you want to tilt the court to the Right then?

- Doc

ps- The irony, then, is that I'm probably more left-leaning if you use this as any sort of measure:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideolog ... t_justices

I have no issue with the court tilting to the right. I believe that it tends to result in less slop finding it’s way into legislation down the road (or surviving within it, anyway). Hard to explain the connection, but you might know where I’m going with that.

Regardless, I have no desire to see immature, victim-mentality, conspiracy-addled, vengeance-seeking liars of either side of the political fence occupy a seat on the Court.

[_subgenius]

Ha!
your turning a blind eye to Hillary's tantrum during Benghazi shows that your judgment is staunchly partisan to the Left.

There you go again, with your comprehension difficulties. Let alone that Hillary wasn’t a candidate for the Supreme Court, so you’re just looking for an excuse to babble on about a Clinton, just like Kavanaugh’s wild-eyed ranting. Those Clintons just twist your britches, don’t they?
; )

But, please continue, and c/p some of her statements that you feel relate to this discussion. Bonus points if you include whatever commentary I had about them at the time.

I know Hillary Clinton was not a candidate for Supreme Court (as my post clarified), but i thought we were doing that thing were a superfluous judgment about an unrelated circumstance was imagined as relevant.

But as for quoting Hillary Clinton in an emotional outburst, i would, but "what difference would it make anyway"?

[_canpakes]

...as for quoting Hillary Clinton in an emotional outburst, i would, but "what difference would it make anyway"?

Oh, yes. Six words long. That really compares so well to over an hour’s worth of juvenile ranting from Kavenaugh. As well, we seem to be missing the threats, the whining, the conspiracy claims and the accusations of ‘destroying her life’. Probably because Grandma Hillary has a bigger set of balls that our virginal, flatulent (or is it boofy?) nominee Kavanaugh, who can’t bear to suffer any investigation, let alone a half dozen like Grandma did.

You sure have a knack for piss poor analogies. But at least you’re not chittering on about Nazis this time.

I know Hillary Clinton was not a candidate for Supreme Court (as my post clarified), but i thought we were doing that thing were a superfluous judgment about an unrelated circumstance was imagined as relevant.

No, we weren’t doing that thing. You were doing your poor comprehension thing again.