
You are willfully ignorant; not that you’re literally an idiot, because you’re not, but you are most definitely a useful idiot along with 70M other voters in this country. No excuses, whatsoever. Shameful and sickening.
- Doc
Thank's for the commentary Sir Russiagate. May you always stay true to your charge.Doctor CamNC4Me wrote: ↑Sat Jun 14, 2025 12:51 pmSergey Kislyak, Sergey Gorkov, Natalia Veselnitskaya, Rinat Akhmetshin, Konstantin Kilimnik, Aleksandr Torshin, Maria Butina, Dmitri Rogozin, Dmitri Klokov, Yevgeniy Prigozhin, Guccifer 2.0, Internet Research Agency, Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU), Unit 26165, Unit 74455, Viktor Netyksho, Boris Antonov, Dmitriy Badin, Aleksandr Osadchuk, Aleksey Kovalev, Pavel Yershov, Sergey Morgachev, Nikolai Kozachev, Ivan Yermakov, Artur Kovalev, Vladimir Aleksandrov, Mikhail Potepkin, Andrey Muraviev, Evgeny Buryakov, Mikhail Kavelashvili, Oleg Deripaska, Igor Sechin, Natalia Kislyak, Sergei Skripal, Igor Diveykin, Alexander Prokopchuk, Elena Branson, Denis Kiselyov, Vladimir Yakunin, Sergei Lavrov, Viktor Ivanov, Mikhail Fradkov, Alexei Gromov.
You are willfully ignorant; not that you’re literally an idiot, because you’re not, but you are most definitely a useful idiot along with 70M other voters in this country. No excuses, whatsoever. Shameful and sickening.
- Doc
Thanks for confirming the exaggeration. By the way, the one making the claim has the burden in case you forgot. But we are dealing with TDS and emotional thinking and so I guess assuming doesn't do what it usually does.Jersey Girl wrote: ↑Sat Jun 14, 2025 4:22 amAnd Exiled...you can look these things up as easy as anyone else can. Why are some people around here in the habit of asking everyone else where something came from? Did you think that I or anyone else here doesn't check on these types of claims? Do you think that I blindly trust any news commentator or journalist?
Nah. You got the wrong Jersey Girl, buddy.
Shoo now. Go look it up and see what you can find out.
Wrong again. You have an impoverished imagination.
Ajax, take a moment’s break from ranting at other taxpayers for not ranting about paying taxes, and tell me how you interpret Jersey Girl’s posted passage. I know that your interpretation usually amounts to charity solely being an ‘if I want to’ thing, but are there any exceptions as you see it?ajax18 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 13, 2025 8:56 pmIf that's your interpretation of Christianity that failure to provide aid is equal to murder, then what kind of Christian are you enjoying a comfortable retirement posting on message boards? Why aren't overpaying your taxes and contributing to the economy to help stop this economic emergency? This has nothing to do with Christianity. It's just typical liberal generosity with everyone's time and money but their own.Jersey Girl wrote: ↑Fri Jun 13, 2025 8:43 pmIf you don't want to learn from Kish, then you can learn directly from Jesus the Christ.
Matthew 25 (KJV)
35 For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in:
36 Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me.
37 Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink?
38 When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee?
39 Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee?
40 And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.
Yes, when has this so-called "Bill Gates" ever endorsed the Christian principle of "Dog eat dog"? Unless you put a bullet in the dog's head like Kristi Noem, they will keep coming back asking for more biscuits. Shoot them for Jesus and the prophets.
The Steele dossier alleged that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government in a “well-developed conspiracy”—with Moscow providing help against Hillary Clinton and Trump’s team secretly cooperating in return. Some points in the dossier turned out to be true, such as:Dr Exiled wrote: ↑Sat Jun 14, 2025 2:16 pmThank's for the commentary Sir Russiagate. May you always stay true to your charge.Doctor CamNC4Me wrote: ↑Sat Jun 14, 2025 12:51 pm
Sergey Kislyak, Sergey Gorkov, Natalia Veselnitskaya, Rinat Akhmetshin, Konstantin Kilimnik, Aleksandr Torshin, Maria Butina, Dmitri Rogozin, Dmitri Klokov, Yevgeniy Prigozhin, Guccifer 2.0, Internet Research Agency, Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU), Unit 26165, Unit 74455, Viktor Netyksho, Boris Antonov, Dmitriy Badin, Aleksandr Osadchuk, Aleksey Kovalev, Pavel Yershov, Sergey Morgachev, Nikolai Kozachev, Ivan Yermakov, Artur Kovalev, Vladimir Aleksandrov, Mikhail Potepkin, Andrey Muraviev, Evgeny Buryakov, Mikhail Kavelashvili, Oleg Deripaska, Igor Sechin, Natalia Kislyak, Sergei Skripal, Igor Diveykin, Alexander Prokopchuk, Elena Branson, Denis Kiselyov, Vladimir Yakunin, Sergei Lavrov, Viktor Ivanov, Mikhail Fradkov, Alexei Gromov.
You are willfully ignorant; not that you’re literally an idiot, because you’re not, but you are most definitely a useful idiot along with 70M other voters in this country. No excuses, whatsoever. Shameful and sickening.
- Doc
Here's an article you can avoid or read if you like, at your own leisure of course. It dismantles your conspiracy theory about russiagate. It was clinton and her campaign all along that invented your favorite theory. Sorry to inform you, but its been out there for years and has been debunked for years.
https://www.aaronmate.net/p/russiagate- ... ock-bottom
I'm sure you're a solid poster in other areas and seem to be, if having that notoriety is still important to you. However, you fell for the political games oligarchs and their media use around the world to stop outsiders and populists.
https://www.npr.org/2019/09/27/76487924 ... rt-revealsThe National Rifle Association acted as a "foreign asset" for Russia in the period leading up to the 2016 election, according to a new investigation unveiled Friday by Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore.
http://static.cs.brown.edu/people/jsava ... ingNRA.pdfIntelligence agencies have concluded that Russia, on orders from the highest levels of its government, undertook a sophisticated campaign to hack Democratic computers, spread propaganda and undermine the candidacy of Hillary Clinton. The repeated outreach around the N.R.A. convention, where Mr. Trump accepted the group’s endorsement, came just weeks after a self-described intermediary for the Russian government told George Papadopoulos, a campaign aide, that the Russians had “dirt” on Mrs. Clinton. And just weeks later, the president’s eldest son arranged a meeting at Trump Tower with a Russian lawyer who promised damaging information about the would-be Democratic nominee.
It's such a problem that they forgot about it, probably waiting to see if Patel follows through on his promises. I guess as long as it doesn't interfere with Israel and their war with Iran we might see something. Whatever Sir Russiagate. On to the next adventure.Doctor CamNC4Me wrote: ↑Sat Jun 14, 2025 6:10 pmThe Steele dossier alleged that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government in a “well-developed conspiracy”—with Moscow providing help against Hillary Clinton and Trump’s team secretly cooperating in return. Some points in the dossier turned out to be true, such as:Dr Exiled wrote: ↑Sat Jun 14, 2025 2:16 pm
Thank's for the commentary Sir Russiagate. May you always stay true to your charge.
Here's an article you can avoid or read if you like, at your own leisure of course. It dismantles your conspiracy theory about russiagate. It was clinton and her campaign all along that invented your favorite theory. Sorry to inform you, but its been out there for years and has been debunked for years.
https://www.aaronmate.net/p/russiagate- ... ock-bottom
I'm sure you're a solid poster in other areas and seem to be, if having that notoriety is still important to you. However, you fell for the political games oligarchs and their media use around the world to stop outsiders and populists.
1) The existence of numerous contacts between Trump associates and Russian figures during the 2016 race.
2) The general conclusion — that the Russian government was attempting to influence the 2016 election — was later supported by the Mueller Report and US intelligence agencies.
Regardless, the Steele dossier was just opposition research, not a government report. Confirmed interference, indictment, Russian cyber hacking, and social media manipulation occurred and were prosecuted by Mueller. Trump & team also committed Obstruction by blocking investigations and concealed contacts that refleced genuine counterintelligence concerns. Not that you care about such things.
Additionally:
1) Mueller’s team indicted 12 GRU officers for hacking the DNC and Podesta’s emails, the Steele dossier wasn't involved in that case.
2) The Senate Intelligence Committee, a Republican-led body, corroborated extensive Russian interference and numerous Trump-campaign contacts. Neither Steele nor Durham had fuckall to do with that.
3) The DOJ and DNI also gave “high confidence” that Russia executed a dual strategy: hacking and social media
Your edgelord Maté criticized Steele’s activism, but blithely overlooked concrete evidence like Trump Jr.’s meeting with the Russian lawyer promising dirt, Manafort’s back-channel messages, and Flynn’s undisclosed discussions with Ambassador Kislyak.
The Mueller Report describes 140+ undisclosed foreign contacts in addition to Trump & team’s efforts to obstruct justice; no Steele dossier necessary. There’s truckloads more evidence and Russian agents embedded with the GOP ecosystem, but you not care about such things, being the absolute deranged sycophant afflicted with TDS that you are. You have to exist in a headspace that must allow for outrageous accommodations for the greasiest POS to be President, beholden to damned Russians. TDS, indeed.
- Doc
Let's use this as an example. Sadly this is not a hypothetical. A leftist borrows as much money and maxes out as many credit cards as possible. She then proceeds to go to Russia and eastern Europe and give the money away to whoever she deems worthy of it. Then unfortunately she's permitted to reenter the US and file for bankruptcy. 7 years later, she'll probably do it all over again. Is this an example of what Jesus was teaching? It's exactly what we're doing here in the US. We're $37 trillion in debt and inasmuch as people figure out that we never can nor will pay it back, it will lead to an economic collapse. Why are we giving away money at all when we can't even stop running a deficit let alone begin to pay down this debt? It's not our money to give. But you do have money that is yours to give and if every leftist did give away what you're asking everyone else to give away, would this not be plenty of money for a drop in the bucket like USAID? Given that leftists are such great followers of the teachings of Jesus, why hasn't this just happened on its own unaided by the heavy hand of communism?canpakes wrote: ↑Sat Jun 14, 2025 4:14 pmAjax, take a moment’s break from ranting at other taxpayers for not ranting about paying taxes, and tell me how you interpret Jersey Girl’s posted passage. I know that your interpretation usually amounts to charity solely being an ‘if I want to’ thing, but are there any exceptions as you see it?ajax18 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 13, 2025 8:56 pm
If that's your interpretation of Christianity that failure to provide aid is equal to murder, then what kind of Christian are you enjoying a comfortable retirement posting on message boards? Why aren't overpaying your taxes and contributing to the economy to help stop this economic emergency? This has nothing to do with Christianity. It's just typical liberal generosity with everyone's time and money but their own.
Matthew 25 (KJV)
35 For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in:
36 Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me.
37 Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink?
38 When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee?
39 Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee?
40 And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.