The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
-
_Jason Bourne
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 9207
- Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm
Post
by _Jason Bourne »
Runtu wrote:charity wrote:Jersey Girl wrote:I'm not done with this topic yet. (Like anyone cares ;-)
So what is the best defense for the witnesses to the Gold Plates and translation?
Worst defense?
Best defense? None of the witnesses every denied their testimony, even though they had good reasons to do so if it had been false.
I'm still wondering how relevant the testimony of the witnesses is. James Strang had plates and witnesses. So what?
Well there are witnesses then there are witnesses. I think you have to compare and contrast. I know nothing about the Strange witnesses.
-
_Jersey Girl
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 34407
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am
Post
by _Jersey Girl »
charity wrote:Jersey Girl wrote:I'm not done with this topic yet. (Like anyone cares ;-)
So what is the best defense for the witnesses to the Gold Plates and translation?
Worst defense?
Best defense? None of the witnesses every denied their testimony, even though they had good reasons to do so if it had been false.
Didn't some of them
change their testimonies?