The artificial intelligence MEGATHREAD

[malkie]

Shades has stated that Mg has not yet had the number of chances Ludwigm had, when asked why he's allowed to continue breaking rules. And since Shades also said Ludwigm had 'infinitely more chances' than mg has had before he was banned, we may never find a resolution.

Wait, WHAT? Ludwigm was banned?? When did that happen?

Since you're here in this thread, would you mind having a look at viewtopic.php?p=2916253#p2916253 and tell me if I've substantially misrepresented anything? Including in the part that Whiskey quoted. You're the expert.

[Limnor]

I know it may be hard to believe ( ) but some of the best writing I've done in a while has been here. I know, it's not anywhere close to the level of certain other posters, but it is what it is. If the solution to too much AI is to write better, then I should consider lurking, because you likely won't get anything substantially better out of me.

I hope you don’t stop posting, malkie. Your willingness to patiently make a clear stand and barely concealed exasperation with nonsense is honestly one of the things that keeps this place interesting.

[Whiskey]

If the solution to too much AI is to write better, then I should consider lurking, because you likely won't get anything substantially better out of me.

Nonsense. Better is not fancier. Authenticity can't be replaced with wordsmithery and propernesses.

Keep doing what you are doing. Your lurk mode is denied.

[Dr. Shades]

Wait, WHAT? Ludwigm was banned?? When did that happen?

Since you're here in this thread, would you mind having a look at viewtopic.php?p=2916253#p2916253 and tell me if I've substantially misrepresented anything? Including in the part that Whiskey quoted. You're the expert.

Please give me several hours.

[Whiskey]

Worth noting, I think, that there have been conversations that were derailed to be about MG, not the OP or thread topic, because MG has made them about him. And many threads in which other posters have tried to steer the conversation back to the OP or thread topic after a derail.

Fair. Very reasonable point. Making the post about yourself, beyond just personalizing the point or conversation, is a distraction. You ain't wrong. It is no more interesting than the posts about the poster not the topic.

[Marcus]

Shades has stated that Mg has not yet had the number of chances Ludwigm had, when asked why he's allowed to continue breaking rules. And since Shades also said Ludwigm had 'infinitely more chances' than mg has had before he was banned, we may never find a resolution.

Wait, WHAT? Ludwigm was banned?? When did that happen?

I don't know. Based on your response to ihq it seemed implied:

How many reminders about ones flagrant board rule breaking is a poster entitled to before other action is considered?

Other actions have not only been considered but taken as well. I simply don't announce such actions publicly.

How many chances did ludwigm get?

Orders of magnitude more than MG 2.0 got.

But I am happy to be corrected if I have a wrong perception. What did happen?

[Limnor]

Worth noting, I think, that there have been conversations that were derailed to be about MG, not the OP or thread topic, because MG has made them about him. And many threads in which other posters have tried to steer the conversation back to the OP or thread topic after a derail.

Fair. Very reasonable point. Making the post about yourself, beyond just personalizing the point or conversation, is a distraction. You ain't wrong. It is no more interesting than the posts about the poster not the topic.

I think both malkie and Whiskey are right. Threads often get pulled off-topic, but a lot of that comes from MG making the discussion about himself rather than the OP. Once that pattern emerged and it became clear that reasonable discussion was pointless, especially the part where he kept demanding direct answers while giving none in return (right here: viewtopic.php?p=2915904#p2915904), I shifted into full parody and satire mode. Engaging him straight isn’t productive and it makes more sense to treat him to a reflection of himself rather than play by whatever rules are inside his head.

[Dr. Shades]

Wait, WHAT? Ludwigm was banned?? When did that happen?

I don't know. Based on your response to ihq it seemed implied . . . But I am happy to be corrected if I have a wrong perception. What did happen?

It looks like he has since deleted his "ludwigm" account. But prior to that he was placed on the queue twice but never banned.

I'm sure his many sock puppets are still active, though.

Since you're here in this thread, would you mind having a look at viewtopic.php?p=2916253#p2916253 and tell me if I've substantially misrepresented anything? Including in the part that Whiskey quoted. You're the expert.

You haven't misrepresented anything.

[malkie]

I don't know. Based on your response to ihq it seemed implied . . . But I am happy to be corrected if I have a wrong perception. What did happen?

It looks like he has since deleted his "ludwigm" account. But prior to that he was placed on the queue twice but never banned.

I'm sure his many sock puppets are still active, though.

Since you're here in this thread, would you mind having a look at viewtopic.php?p=2916253#p2916253 and tell me if I've substantially misrepresented anything? Including in the part that Whiskey quoted. You're the expert.

You haven't misrepresented anything.

Thanks for taking the time to review my comment - much appreciated

[Hound of Heaven]

First, I want to thank to DrCamnPP for introducing me to the concept of running posts through an AI platform to determine if they have been written or influenced by AI.

Until yesterday, I had minimal experience with anything related to AI. Thank you, DrCamnPP, for being your idiotic self and for your belief that the moderators on this board are at your beck and call, as if they are sitting, waiting at home for your messages every time you think a board member you don't like is violating a rule. In my opinion, it's hysterical that you still hold those feelings, but throughout the past year, your influence over the moderators has diminished a lot! You have most definitely become just a shadow of your former self.

Returning to the topic at, I've demonstrated that AI perceives Limnor's posts as being generated by AI, based on his writing style. I have submitted more than a dozen of Limnor's posts across three different AI platforms, and all three consistently agree without. GadiSCAMton is another example, if you analyze his post using an AI platform, it will come back that a large portion of his content is generated with assistance from AI. Same for Wang Chung and numerous other regular board members.

Last night, I decided to start reading threads, and when I came across a post that seemed to be crafted with the assistance of AI, I copied it and tested it through different AI platforms to see if it would be flagged as AI generated content. In my opinion, one of the board members here whose post reads as AI generated is Doctor Scratch. In my opinion, when I read his posts, they seem to be an AI quality. There’s a quality to his post that gives it an AI generated feel. Now, I understand that on this board, Doctor Scratch is seen as a deity by the Marxists, with dumb dumbs like Marcus the Carcass, GadiSCAMton, and Wang Chung among others, who idolize, almost as if he's their internet God. However, I find his post o be AI quality. Even AI agrees with me!

Running a post written by Doctor Scratch through AI is more than likely to be flaggedas writtenby AI, proving that Doctor Scratch is using AI to improve his writing. Now, I recognize that this outcome may be challenging for those who hold him in high regard as as their internet God, specifically the individuals I mentioned earlier, but it is indeed the case. I think he's utilizing AI to create posts, and AI agrees!

So GadiSCAMton, Marcus the Carcass, DrCamnPP, are y'all planning to report Doctor Scratch or Limnor to the moderators for utilizing AI to enhance post, just like you Marxist report MG2.0?

If I were to share on the board, 10 of Doctor Scratch's posts that have been positively enhanced by AI, would you then consider reporting him to the moderators? Nope!!! you will not, because Doctor Scratch is your God, and the reason you all put so much effort into reporting MG2.0 to the moderators for using AI is that you dislike MG2.0 due to his conservative leanings and primarily because he is a devout Mormon.

The following image features a post authored by Doctor Scratch from a discussion thread titled An Insider Speaks "Six Days in August". From the moment I began reading, it was clear to me that the post had been enhanced by AI. AI agrees with me.