The artificial intelligence MEGATHREAD

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

Can the Mods start a megatard thread for the HoH? All his posts are just griping about his perceived enemies and something something communism Marxist liberals.

He’s BORING, and unsuspecting newcomers to the board ought not be assaulted by his verbal diarrhea; Lord knows his handler has a bad enough time changing his diaper, let’s leave his messes up to them, yeah?

Also, Liberals RULE while rePUGniCAN’TS drool!

[Dr. Shades]

In my opinion, one of the board members here whose post reads as AI generated is Doctor Scratch. In my opinion, when I read his posts, they seem to be an AI quality. There’s a quality to his post that gives it an AI generated feel. . . If I were to share on the board, 10 of Doctor Scratch's posts that have been positively enhanced by AI, would you then consider reporting him to the moderators? Nope!!! . . . The following image features a post authored by Doctor Scratch from a discussion thread titled An Insider Speaks "Six Days in August". From the moment I began reading, it was clear to me that the post had been enhanced by AI. AI agrees with me.

The reason Doctor Scratch's posts seem to you to be A.I.-enhanced is because he's an incredibly good writer. His writing has been just like what you see here for many years, long before A.I. was invented.

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

In my opinion, one of the board members here whose post reads as AI generated is Doctor Scratch. In my opinion, when I read his posts, they seem to be an AI quality. There’s a quality to his post that gives it an AI generated feel. . . If I were to share on the board, 10 of Doctor Scratch's posts that have been positively enhanced by AI, would you then consider reporting him to the moderators? Nope!!! . . . The following image features a post authored by Doctor Scratch from a discussion thread titled An Insider Speaks "Six Days in August". From the moment I began reading, it was clear to me that the post had been enhanced by AI. AI agrees with me.

The reason Doctor Scratch's posts seem to you to be A.I.-enhanced is because he's an incredibly good writer. His writing has been just like what you see here for many years, long before A.I. was invented.

Now. Pretend you’re a detective looking for abuse of AI by a poster. There’s a huge clue staring you in the face with the post you just made.

[Hound of Heaven]

The reason Doctor Scratch's posts seem to you to be A.I.-enhanced is because he's an incredibly good writer. His writing has been just like what you see here for many years, long before A.I. was invented.

Now. Pretend you’re a detective looking for abuse of AI by a poster. There’s a huge clue staring you in the face with the post you just made.

Since I have literally turned you into a shell of the person you used to be a year ago on this board, I’m going to keep this discussion rolling about AI. After all, I’m not AI, and once I show you I’m not, you'll be completely neutered.

Here’s the plan, over the next few days, I’m going to enter my posts through various AIs, and then I’ll share the results from each platform on this thread. This is going to be a fun, because, as I mentioned, I've totally helped ruin your influence on the board!

The three post below are from me, I think back in 2023 and 24.

[Hound of Heaven]

Here's a post I wrote in January of this year. It is a very long post. By the looks of it, probably 800 to 1000 words.

[Hound of Heaven]

Here's an opening post from a thread I started in February of this year. Probably 500 to 700 words.

This time I used Perplexity

[Gadianton]

Hound's initial posts trivially came up as full ChatGPT productions. A couple Mormon-themed ones were pretty good posts but were essayish of the variety LLMs are decent at -- stealing content from elsewhere and repackaging with monotone AI optimism. AI is better at straight lines than it is turns, and so anything from Hound that required reasoning rather than data-dumping displayed the typical LLM flaws. Once it was called out, the hand behind the puppet adapted appropriately. Presumably, the hand behind the sock runs the raw ChatGPT output against ChatGPT Zero and alters the posts until it doesn't register anymore. The AI detectors quit catching it as soon as it was called out -- though it's been months since I've checked any Hound posts. Whether there are automated ways to help with this I don't know, but, the output of Hound is slow enough to ride under the radar with slow methods.

And honestly, I don't care that much. AI is here to stay, the problem is only going to get worse, and so get used to AI becoming more difficult to prove. I'd say if a post has a high hit on ChatGPT Zero and the reporter coveys this to the mods who can check for themselves, then they should move the posts to this thread or ban the sock. It's just that if a person is really set on using AI instead of actually learning something, which would take less time, then it's going to be difficult to prove.

I've told you guys the solution for Hound, ignore. Like, never respond. Since he's only here to troll, he will go away if everyone but Whiskey ignores him. You don't want to do it, so live with it. I think Shades could put more effort into moderating his forum rather than saddling Canpakes with everything, but I acknowledge the difficulty of proving posts are AI if the hand behind the post is modifying the output until it escapes detectors. ChatGPT and DeepSeek both have a similar voice and I do feel like I can detect it by sight even when ChatGPT zero doesn't work, but, as time goes on, I imagine AIs will find new voices.

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

Shades,

Taking the HoH’s spazzing out as context, if you were a detective and had the HoH in the interview room right now, what would you be thinking?

[I Have Questions]

I've told you guys the solution for Hound, ignore. Like, never respond. Since he's only here to troll, he will go away if everyone but Whiskey ignores him.

Solid counsel.

[Hound of Heaven]

Hound's initial posts trivially came up as full ChatGPT productions. A couple Mormon-themed ones were pretty good posts but were essayish of the variety LLMs are decent at -- stealing content from elsewhere and repackaging with monotone AI optimism. AI is better at straight lines than it is turns, and so anything from Hound that required reasoning rather than data-dumping displayed the typical LLM flaws. Once it was called out, the hand behind the puppet adapted appropriately. Presumably, the hand behind the sock runs the raw ChatGPT output against ChatGPT Zero and alters the posts until it doesn't register anymore. The AI detectors quit catching it as soon as it was called out -- though it's been months since I've checked any Hound posts. Whether there are automated ways to help with this I don't know, but, the output of Hound is slow enough to ride under the radar with slow methods.

And honestly, I don't care that much. AI is here to stay, the problem is only going to get worse, and so get used to AI becoming more difficult to prove. I'd say if a post has a high hit on ChatGPT Zero and the reporter coveys this to the mods who can check for themselves, then they should move the posts to this thread or ban the sock. It's just that if a person is really set on using AI instead of actually learning something, which would take less time, then it's going to be difficult to prove.

I've told you guys the solution for Hound, ignore. Like, never respond. Since he's only here to troll, he will go away if everyone but Whiskey ignores him. You don't want to do it, so live with it. I think Shades could put more effort into moderating his forum rather than saddling Canpakes with everything, but I acknowledge the difficulty of proving posts are AI if the hand behind the post is modifying the output until it escapes detectors. ChatGPT and DeepSeek both have a similar voice and I do feel like I can detect it by sight even when ChatGPT zero doesn't work, but, as time goes on, I imagine AIs will find new voices.

And the truth comes out. Shades, you seeing this? GadiSCAMton like all the other progressives view you as the problem with this board. Not your bias moderator Can'tpakes.

I find it humorous the progressives like GadiSCAMton and Marcus the Carcass among others, view you, not Can'tpakes as the weak link.