harmony wrote:Persephone wrote:Other than your obvious personal interest in such things...
Bingo!
How shocking and shameful that a substantial project that I founded, created, and direct at BYU reflects my academic interests!
But now the secret's out, and I'm discredited forever.
CaliforniaKid wrote:I mean, why Middle Eastern texts?
I suspect that Nibley had a great deal to do with that.
Nothing whatsoever.
Persephone wrote:In reality, I consider Mister Scratch and his usual endeavors (at least as evidenced by this message board) annoyingly puerile.
Oh oh. I guess Kishkumen Scratch's chair remains vacant.
Well, I must say that you and I seem to think somewhat alike, in at least certain respects, on the matter of Mister Scratch. That's nice to know.
Persephone wrote:the primary pursuit of FARMS and the Maxwell Institute is apologetics. All the other things are window dressing.
Here's the truth:
FARMS was originally established as a private 501(c)3 foundation to support and distribute Mormon studies. Not necessarily apologetic in focus, but studies of Mormon scripture from a believing Mormon point of view, where that point of view is relevant. Even in Mormon studies, much of what FARMS has done and continues to do isn't directly apologetic at all (as in the case of, say, Royal Skousen's mammoth, nearly-two-decade long Critical Text project). And it operated for its first several years on a shoestring budget. But then some very gratifying private individual donations began to come in, unsolicited.
At a certain point, when people connected with FARMS (e.g., Noel Reynolds, Truman Madsen, and, initially only peripherally, yours truly) were approached by the new leadership of the Dead Sea Scrolls Foundation and the Scrolls editorial team to help put the scandal of their non-publication to an end, we determined that the institutional mechanisms for supporting such publication and creating an electronic database of the Scrolls didn't exist at BYU, so we decided to handle the matter ourselves. We were a group of scholars who, among us, had all of the requisite training. Our people would have been the ones doing it at BYU anyway, so we decided to take the project on ourselves.
This caught BYU's attention, and ultimately led to the affiliation of FARMS with BYU.
How did METI originate? I had decided, way back in graduate school, that such a translation series was highly desirable, and that its absence was a weird and serious hole in Western scholarship on Islam. Some years after I arrived at BYU, one of the Seventy, now emeritus, contacted me and wanted to have a conversation with me about how BYU could help the Church build a relationship with the Muslim world. We discussed roughly ten different options. A former academic himself, he was most taken with my suggestion of a translation series. He took it back to Salt Lake, and the order came down for me to launch such a series. But I had to raise the money for it myself.
Launching the project, and then running it, was very difficult and extraordinarily time-consuming. Besides the actual soliciting, vetting, editing, preparation, printing, and binding of books, I had to do all of the bookkeeping and all of the fundraising (something I deeply dislike), handle contracts for off-campus typesetting, find and hire part-time student employees, deal with personnel and paycheck issues, etc. My department and college had their hands full with normal teaching and faculty issues, and really couldn't help much. I hated it. It was destroying my life. So, one day, I approached the leadership of FARMS and pointed out that they already had a small office staff that routinely and competently dealt with all of those issues, and that adding the Islamic Translation Series to their assignments would represent only a slight increase in their duties but would take an enormous load off of me. They agreed, and I brought the translation project over to what was then FARMS.
The fit, given the name
Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, was rather odd, but, organizationally, it worked very well. Eventually, since we were doing non-Mormon things like the Library of the Christian East, the Eastern Christian Texts Series, the Medical Works of Moses Maimonides, the Islamic Translation Series, digitizing Syriac manuscripts at the Vatican, performing multispectral imaging in Naples and Bonampak and Petra, publishing searchable electronic databases of the Dead Sea Scrolls and the
Popul Vuh, etc., we decided that the name was misleading. So we shifted, first, to the execrable title of
Institute for the Study and Preservation of Ancient Religious Texts, and then, more happily, to
The Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship.
If you want to insist on imagining that all of our database projects and multispectral imaging projects and Islamic and Christian and Jewish publishing projects, and the like, are merely "window dressing," a smokescreen and a "ruse," there's nothing I can do to stop you. But I can tell you that you're wrong.
Persephone wrote:I mean, why Middle Eastern texts? Other than your obvious personal interest in such things, what possible arguments could be advanced in favor of a Mormon university focusing so much on this niche in the academic world?
My personal interests should not be discounted as a factor. Many undertakings, at BYU and elsewhere, originate at the start in the strong interests of a single member of the faculty.
But the obvious reasons have already been alluded to, above: The project needed to be done, and doing it at BYU represents a gesture of friendship and respect toward the Islamic world.
Persephone wrote:From my perspective, it was a safe, controversy-free area in which there was a historical lack of interest on the part of American academia.
If you imagine that there are no controversies in the field of Islamic philosophy, it can only be because you're unfamiliar with the field. There are rival schools of thinking, bitter personal antagonisms, massive egos, etc.
This is academia, after all. As Henry Kissinger once observed of departmental politics at Harvard, the battles are so fierce because the stakes are so small.
Persephone wrote:It almost makes one wonder if the criteria were established up front, and then a search was undertaken to find a prime candidate for the "front" enterprise.
I'm relieved to know that it only
almost makes you wonder about that silly scenario.
Persephone wrote:And now that the accolades are starting to trickle in, METI is proving to be nothing less than a stroke of genius.
Even though it really wasn't meant as such, I'll take that as a generous personal compliment.