Locked thread..Mod intervention..Pahoran given last word MAD

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Pahoran
_Emeritus
Posts: 1296
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:20 am

Re: Locked thread..Mod intervention..Pahoran given last word

Post by _Pahoran »

Drifting wrote:
Pahoran wrote:Turrets syndrome?

Is that when a poster starts to resemble a tank?



Regards,
Pahoran


Okay, THAT was funny!

Thank you. I admit I enjoy seeing humour in all sorts of things, including attempts to insult me.

Regards,
Pahoran
_cwald
_Emeritus
Posts: 4443
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:53 pm

Re: Locked thread..Mod intervention..Pahoran given last word

Post by _cwald »

cwald wrote: Here you see a classic example of how apologists at MAD work. They get up on their high horse as superiors, then they completely try to derail the thread with ridicules CFRs, using classic lawyer logic, that one can't use any kind of common sense reasonable deductive logic in the discussion, and you must provide absolute evidence of the truth of your claim, or it is invalid...oh the irony...coming from a group that is in the tenuous position of trying to defend the LDS church.

BUT, then, when they are giving facts and quotes and scientific knowledge, they either out right deny it, or they try to do mental gymnastics to make it fit their paradigm...and they almost always resort to mocking the poster rather than addressing the issue...and they have the balls to call those that disagree with them apostate, wolf in sheep clothing, Korihors.

Classic.

I'm sure Pohoran will call for CFR for this post as well.

A good example is my previous post where Pahoran called for reference about him claiming the thread was closed because of Maxrep insults towards him. I quoted him saying just that. Let's see how he apoligizes his way out that mess.

1. He will mock me, the poster who provided the facts.
2. He will do some mental gymnastics saying that I took him out of context or something.
3. He will call for a CFR or something again.
4. He will close the thread and I will get banned.
5. He will reopen the thread, put up JUST ONE more faith promoting post, and then close it again so no else can respond to it.

Oh wait. I forgot. This board is all about having a fair playing field, and it is more interested in the truth, rather than defending the organization. My bad.


Okay. Lets see how well I did.

Pahoran wrote: Hey cwald: when you've graduated from the kind of filth that is all you and your fellow-haters comprehend, to learning how to communicate in English,


1. He will mock me, the poster who provided the facts. CHECK

Pahoran wrote: you may come to understand that "personal jabs... had something to do with why the thread was closed" is not synonymous with "Maxrep was insulting me.


2. He will do some mental gymnastics saying that I took him out of context or something. CHECK

You forgot to ask for a CFR Pahoran. Oh wait...I already provided that. Now MAD apoligists will proceed to...
4. He will close the thread and I will get banned.
5. He will reopen the thread, put up JUST ONE more faith promoting post, and then close it again so no else can respond to it.

Hahahaha. Don't you love having a fair playing field Parohan? Don't you just love it over here where the mods can't come in and save your ass whenever a thread starts to make you look silly. Don't you just love a board that is more interested in the truth, rather than protecting the institution at all costs like MAD where it is perfectly justified to sell one's personal and organizational integrity? It's nice over here isn't it, where you can't, and the mods won't thread ban participants and close threads when facts and logic start to get in the way of the church truth claims?
"Jesus gave us the gospel, but Satan invented church. It takes serious evil to formalize faith into something tedious and then pile guilt on anyone who doesn’t participate enthusiastically." - Robert Kirby

Beer makes you feel the way you ought to feel without beer. -- Henry Lawson
Post Reply