Will Schryver "Problematic" for Maxwell Institute?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Kevin Graham
_Emeritus
Posts: 13037
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm

Re: Will Schryver "Problematic" for Maxwell Institute?

Post by _Kevin Graham »

I read that part of the misogyny thread. It's totally obvious that Will never used that word. The guy on the thread where he was alleged to have said it denied that Will had used that word. I noticed that the woman who made the allegation is a moderator here. That sure makes it easy to forge or manipulate posts, doesn't it? How convenient.


You're lying Will. That person only denied seeing that word. That's not the same as saying it he knows it never happened. I, however, was there when it happened. And while I honestly don't recall the precise word, I know it was pretty harsh because it was enough to get me fuming. When I was told it was the C word, I thought yes, that's about right. I think my response to his comment, before it was edited out, was to tell him I couldn't wait until we met face to face. I'd probably make sure he had at least two fake front teeth instead of just one. Someone else who knows him PMed me some information about him and said his front tooth was knocked out of his head via fist. Gee, hard to imagine someone like William getting punched in the face.

So I remember that what he said was way over the line, even by William's standards. The guy also accused people on this forum of being anal sex freaks and refers to circle-jerking; when a bunch of men gather around to ejaculate together, etc. The guy is a complete ass and he knows it. It is why he hides out over at the other forum, because he knows my refutations to his stupidity and blatant dishonesty will always be edited out. Of course, MAD is essentially an arm of FAIR, and FAIR has already committed itself to a number of Schryverisms. Hardly surprising that Maxwell would want to drop him. He is an embarrassment to Mormonism.

Incidentally, last week William did the most idiotic thing I had ever seen a father do. After Juliann's photo was stolen by some idiot and manipulated on the web with sexual commentary, William makes the brilliant move of posting a huge photo of his 13 year-old daughter's face over at the MAD forum. His reason was to show people that someone who fathered such a beautiful girl could never be a misogynist. What kind of irresponsible fool would but his own daughter in that position? I immediately begged the mods to remove the photo before some idiot took it and put it up on some website with sexual innuendo. They removed it immediately. I explained that he must be a crappy father to use his daughter's existence to bail him out of his own idiotic antics. How sad that I care more about this little girl than her own father.
_Shulem
_Emeritus
Posts: 12072
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:48 am

Re: Will Schryver "Problematic" for Maxwell Institute?

Post by _Shulem »

Christ jezzus -- the holy cross, William-boy displayed his 13 year old daughter on the other board? WTF? That's got to be pretty stupid. Poor William, the LSD/acid ate his brain when he was a teenager and he can bearly see straight today. Ain't that right, William? -- your fly is down. ;-)

Paul O
_Runtu
_Emeritus
Posts: 16721
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 5:06 am

Re: Will Schryver "Problematic" for Maxwell Institute?

Post by _Runtu »

You know, I've struggled all my life with the need to be liked, but as bad as that has been, it pales in comparison to some other people's need to be noticed. Absolutely astounding, and very disturbing. Even I'm not that needy.
Runtu's Rincón

If you just talk, I find that your mouth comes out with stuff. -- Karl Pilkington
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: Will Schryver "Problematic" for Maxwell Institute?

Post by _Chap »

Kevin Graham wrote:Incidentally, last week William did the most idiotic thing I had ever seen a father do. After Juliann's photo was stolen by some idiot and manipulated on the web with sexual commentary, William makes the brilliant move of posting a huge photo of his 13 year-old daughter's face over at the MAD forum. His reason was to show people that someone who fathered such a beautiful girl could never be a misogynist. What kind of irresponsible fool would but his own daughter in that position? I immediately begged the mods to remove the photo before some idiot took it and put it up on some website with sexual innuendo. They removed it immediately. I explained that he must be a s****y father to use his daughter's existence to bail him out of his own idiotic antics. How sad that I care more about this little girl than her own father.


I am a father of both sons and daughters. I would not even put the initial letters of their names on an open board. I would not even put a photograph of my deceased grandmother on a public board.

The man is seriously deranged.

Manca una rotella. (Just in case he is reading this and wants to feel clever.)
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: Will Schryver "Problematic" for Maxwell Institute?

Post by _Darth J »

For those who were not in late-night chat tonight, there is a betting pool going on about how soon it will be before Nomad shows up.

Just FYI.
_Runtu
_Emeritus
Posts: 16721
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 5:06 am

Re: Will Schryver "Problematic" for Maxwell Institute?

Post by _Runtu »

Darth J wrote:For those who were not in late-night chat tonight, there is a betting pool going on about how soon it will be before Nomad shows up.

Just FYI.


Monday at the latest.
Runtu's Rincón

If you just talk, I find that your mouth comes out with stuff. -- Karl Pilkington
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Re: Will Schryver "Problematic" for Maxwell Institute?

Post by _asbestosman »

Looks like the troll is hungry for attention.

Here's what I don't get. From what I can tell, Will is a very intelligent, talented, capable person. I can understand how those things might contribute to being arrogant. Heck, I come across as arrogant sometimes--and maybe I am. But here's the thing. Will has an obvious need to be liked, but not just by his friends by by his opponents (or is that full blown enemies?). So why not use his talents to entertain? He might gain the admiration he craves.

But he doesn't do that. Instead he uses intimidation, rudeness, and just being a first class a_hole. Why? Does his brain not make the connection between cause and effect and see that crudeness and cruelty aren't well-received? I mean, I could understand if he was just some kind of sadist, but then he wants those he hurts to like him? It's almost as though while craving his enemies' approbation, he resents the power they have not to give it to him and therefore lashes out on them--ironically making it all the less likely he will ever receive their approbation.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_Kevin Graham
_Emeritus
Posts: 13037
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm

Re: Will Schryver "Problematic" for Maxwell Institute?

Post by _Kevin Graham »

I reposted one of my two responses that were deleted yesterday:

http://www.mormondialogue.org/topic/564 ... the-water/

Notice how some of these folks are so nuts, they complain that I'M the one with a bad tone.

Just go over and check out any of the number of threads where William is posting and compare his attitude and condescending tone with what I have posted. There is no comparison. How these people can be so blinded by his own arrogant tone, while constantly whining about mine, is just a mystery to me.
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: Will Schryver "Problematic" for Maxwell Institute?

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

Darth J wrote:For those who were not in late-night chat tonight, there is a betting pool going on about how soon it will be before Nomad shows up.

Just FYI.


Nomad/Mattie/Wll
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.

Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
_sock puppet
_Emeritus
Posts: 17063
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: Will Schryver "Problematic" for Maxwell Institute?

Post by _sock puppet »

Kevin Graham wrote:I reposted one of my two responses that were deleted yesterday:

http://www.mormondialogue.org/topic/564 ... the-water/

Notice how some of these folks are so nuts, they complain that I'm the one with a bad tone.

Just go over and check out any of the number of threads where William is posting and compare his attitude and condescending tone with what I have posted. There is no comparison. How these people can be so blinded by his own arrogant tone, while constantly whining about mine, is just a mystery to me.

Those people prefer keeping mysteries glossed-over, you prefer discovering the truth.
Post Reply