Josephine Sessions

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_ludwigm
_Emeritus
Posts: 10158
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:07 am

Re: Josephine Sessions

Post by _ludwigm »

Hasa Diga Eebowai wrote:
Bazooka wrote:
You tease! Come on, give us the link....


I wouldn't hold your breath Bazooka.

Image

Thanks,

Hasa Diga Eebowai


Image

The image above is the victim of censorship... the picture name is improper.
Here is the same under different file name:
Image

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/damned,_Austria (the link doesn't work because of asterisks...)
damned, Austria
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Page semi-protected
damned
— Village —

Located in Austria 4 kilometers from the German border.
Coordinates: 48°04′02″N 12°51′49″ECoordinates: 48°04′02″N 12°51′49″E
Country Austria
State Upper Austria
Region Innviertel
Municipality Tarsdorf
Established since at least 1070
Named for 6th century nobleman named Focko
Population
• Total 104
Time zone CET (UTC+1)
• Summer (DST) CEST (UTC+2)
Postal code 5121
Area code(s) 06278
Licence plate BR

damned (German pronunciation: [ˈfʊkɪŋ], rhymes with "booking") is an Austrian village in the municipality of Tarsdorf, in the Innviertel region of western Upper Austria. The village is 33 kilometres (21 mi) north of Salzburg, 4 kilometres (2.5 mi) east of the German border.

Google earth is not so bigot...

Image
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Re: Josephine Sessions

Post by _beastie »

Droopy wrote:
This has already been put to rest. Keep in mind that Sylvia returned to Windsor only after Joseph was dead. Amazing, isn't it?

Time to call it in, Beastie, as you're not even up to the starting gate.


This is what is so bizarre about droopy. Most people would recognize that his case is very weak, that it's not a theory that would satisfy many. They'd admit that there are some problems here. Instead, droopy seems to believe that his case is the strongest in the world, and the opposition is weak. I used to believe he was whistling in the dark, but I now believe he truly has some sort of mental abberation that allows him to completely believe he's always not only right, but obviously so.

by the way, droopy, if she "thought" she was divorced, then she would have "thought" she needed to remarry Mr. Lyons. Got a date for that, by chance, or even a shred of evidence for it?
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_Bob Loblaw
_Emeritus
Posts: 3323
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 2:26 am

Re: Josephine Sessions

Post by _Bob Loblaw »

Droopy wrote: Keep in mind that Sylvia returned to Windsor only after Joseph was dead.


Generally, it's best not to keep in mind things that are not true. As I've already shown. Sylvia was living at home with Windsor at the time she was sealed to Joseph and Josephine was conceived.
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS

"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Re: Josephine Sessions

Post by _beastie »

Droopy doesn't want to accept the God that Joseph Smith believed in - a liberal God who understood that "what is wrong in one circumstance may be, and often is, right under another."

In other words, God was A-ok with a woman having more than one husband, just like God was A-ok with a man having more than one wife.

It's interesting that seems to be the line at which LDS defenders of polygamy usually balk. Hey, God may tell men to take more than one wife and even take other men's wives, but ain't no way God is going to condone a woman having more than one husband. Don't talk crazy.

There are a minority of LDS believers willing to consider that reality, but most refuse. I wonder why.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Re: Josephine Sessions

Post by _beastie »

Bob Loblaw wrote:
Generally, it's best not to keep in mind things that are not true.


Hey now, don't rob droopy of his entire worldview.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_Bob Loblaw
_Emeritus
Posts: 3323
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 2:26 am

Re: Josephine Sessions

Post by _Bob Loblaw »

beastie wrote:Hey now, don't rob droopy of his entire worldview.


Brian Hales's evidence that Windsor and Sylvia separated is that they aren't explicitly mentioned together by others. I'd say that's a very low standard of evidence.
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS

"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado
_Bazooka
_Emeritus
Posts: 10719
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 4:36 am

Re: Josephine Sessions

Post by _Bazooka »

Bob Loblaw wrote:
beastie wrote:Hey now, don't rob droopy of his entire worldview.


Brian Hales's evidence that Windsor and Sylvia separated is that they aren't explicitly mentioned together by others. I'd say that's a very low standard of evidence.


I'd agree, a very low standard of evidence indeed. How does that hamper Droopy though? :biggrin:
That said, with the Book of Mormon, we are not dealing with a civilization with no written record. What we are dealing with is a written record with no civilization. (Runtu, Feb 2015)
_Bob Loblaw
_Emeritus
Posts: 3323
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 2:26 am

Re: Josephine Sessions

Post by _Bob Loblaw »

By the way, Patty Sessions I know. Sylvia Lyons I know. But who is this Josephine Sessions?
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS

"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: Josephine Sessions

Post by _Darth J »

Droopy wrote: /irrelevant kung fu fanwank


Droopy, why does a god need more than one goddess-wife to make spirit children?

Also, on page 4 of this thread, you said this:

"all available historical evidence indicates that Sylvia wasn't married to Windsor at the time, or at the very least, didn't consider herself so."

But in another thread, you cited Hales to show that the marriage between Sylvia Sessions Lyon and her real legal husband remained intact: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=29648&p=714296&hilit=intact#p714296

Would you like to decide which of the two different factual claims you have made is the right one?

Finally, suppose one were to agree, for the sake of argument, that Joseph Smith never once had sex with Sylvia Sessions Lyon. Since Joseph Smith's sealing to her violated every single one of the conditions for plural revealed by the Lord in D&C 132, how did Joseph Smith continue to retain his priesthood authority, per D&C 121?
_Bazooka
_Emeritus
Posts: 10719
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 4:36 am

Re: Josephine Sessions

Post by _Bazooka »

Darth J wrote:
Droopy....<snip>

Also, on page 4 of this thread, you said this:

"all available historical evidence indicates that Sylvia wasn't married to Windsor at the time, or at the very least, didn't consider herself so."

But in another thread, you cited Hales to show that the marriage between Sylvia Sessions Lyon and her real legal husband remained intact: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=29648&p=714296&hilit=intact#p714296

Would you like to decide which of the two different factual claims you have made is the right one?



:lol: Now that's funny
That said, with the Book of Mormon, we are not dealing with a civilization with no written record. What we are dealing with is a written record with no civilization. (Runtu, Feb 2015)
Post Reply