Question for Atheists: Abortion
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 2425
- Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:02 am
Re: Question for Atheists: Abortion
Oh. I'm sorry. Are you not LDS, or former Mormon? My bad. Coulda swore we're on Mormon Discussions. Regardless, why would I know you're not? You're not important enough to think about. You're not important enough to know other than when you forgot to take your Midol and wash the sand out of your fat vag before starting something with me.
That aside. I see you don't address any of the issues I raise. I didn't expect you to be introspective enough to consider the crazy position you put yourself in... To argue the morality of a god and a believer who thinks kids getting pecked to death fit within some higher plan.
You're fuckin' crazy. And a hypocrite. There's really no other way to parse it, Jersey Girl. You either advocate the continued misery of the poor by allowing the unrestricted breeding cycle they are in, or you're advocate of a god that designed, put into place, and oversees the cycle of vile rape, murder, starvation, destitution, and abject poverty of its creations. Regardless, you certainly aren't going to actually get your overweight ass up and do anything about it, anyway.
That's crazy. And you advocate it. Screw you, you whacked out vulture.
That aside. I see you don't address any of the issues I raise. I didn't expect you to be introspective enough to consider the crazy position you put yourself in... To argue the morality of a god and a believer who thinks kids getting pecked to death fit within some higher plan.
You're fuckin' crazy. And a hypocrite. There's really no other way to parse it, Jersey Girl. You either advocate the continued misery of the poor by allowing the unrestricted breeding cycle they are in, or you're advocate of a god that designed, put into place, and oversees the cycle of vile rape, murder, starvation, destitution, and abject poverty of its creations. Regardless, you certainly aren't going to actually get your overweight ass up and do anything about it, anyway.
That's crazy. And you advocate it. Screw you, you whacked out vulture.
You can’t trust adults to tell you the truth.
Scream the lie, whisper the retraction.- The Left
Scream the lie, whisper the retraction.- The Left
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 34407
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am
Re: Question for Atheists: Abortion
antishock8 wrote:Oh. I'm sorry. Are you not LDS, or former Mormon? My bad. Coulda swore we're on Mormon Discussions.
A female poster posting on Mormon Discussions is LDS or former LDS. Another fine example of your analytical prowess.
Regardless, why would I know you're not?
Why would you know anything?
You're not important enough to think about.
Yet important enough to spew all this intellectual vomit on apparently.
You're not important enough to know other than when you forgot to take your Midol and wash the sand out of your fat vag before starting something with me.
I see. This is an example of your compassionate leanings toward women, children and the global community at large. When I "start" something with you, you'll know it. So far, you've failed to respond to any points I've made or questions that I've posed to you. No surprises there.
That aside. I see you don't address any of the issues I raise.
Already done. See my posts? In response you choose to first hurl LDS female insults and when called on your error, you resort to hurling female insults. Your posts drip with detectable compassion for women, children, and humanity.
I didn't expect you to be introspective enough to consider the crazy position you put yourself in...
To argue the morality of a god and a believer who thinks kids getting pecked to death fit within some higher plan.
Repost any comments of mine where you think I've argued "the morality of a god and a believer" or a "higher plan". Please sober up before you post or at bare minimum, deal with the reality of the words you're replying to instead of making crap up to cover your anti-intellectual tirade.
You're f*****g' crazy. And a hypocrite.
Was it me who assumed the religious affiliation of the poster I was replying to? Methinks not.
[quote[There's really no other way to parse it, Jersey Girl. You either advocate the continued misery of the poor by allowing the unrestricted breeding cycle they are in, or you're advocate of a god that designed, put into place, and oversees the cycle of vile rape, murder, starvation, destitution, and abject poverty of its creations. [/quote]
Show me anywhere on this thread or any thread on this board or any other board where I've advocated god design in relation to anything. No really. Where you see only two choices, you continue to ignore the third and that is to feed and educate.
Regardless, you certainly aren't going to actually get your overweight ass up and do anything about it, anyway.
My overweight ass? You assess my ass based on what? That I can intellectually whip yours?
That's crazy. And you advocate it. f*** you, you whacked out vulture.
Oh, I see. Feeding and educating people is whacked out. Killing is not whacked out.
Let's go back to this comment for just a sec:
You're not important enough to know other than when you forgot to take your Midol and wash the sand out of your fat vag before starting something with me.[/
I know how strongly you desire to "get personal" with a stranger on the internet and it's not that the attention isn't complimentary however, if you don't mind I'd rather not get into a discussion of gentalia of any sort with the totally dickless.
Just a personal preference.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Chinese Proverb
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 18195
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am
Re: Question for Atheists: Abortion
Antishock, I know it's a stretch for you, but please try to not continue to make the same mistakes over and over again.
#1. Jersey isn't Mormon, not now, not ever. Anyone with half a brain that's been paying the least bit of attention would know that.
#2. Your anti-female comments are duly noted. And we don't forget.
#3. I know Jersey in real life. She may be vertically challenged, but her ass is tiny.
Try to curb your stupidity (and your alcohol intake) when you post here. You make the males of the species look more laughable and pathetic than any Mormon prophet ever did (and we all know how much I love and revere Mormon prophets).
#1. Jersey isn't Mormon, not now, not ever. Anyone with half a brain that's been paying the least bit of attention would know that.
#2. Your anti-female comments are duly noted. And we don't forget.
#3. I know Jersey in real life. She may be vertically challenged, but her ass is tiny.
Try to curb your stupidity (and your alcohol intake) when you post here. You make the males of the species look more laughable and pathetic than any Mormon prophet ever did (and we all know how much I love and revere Mormon prophets).
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 34407
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am
Re: Question for Atheists: Abortion
harmony wrote:Antishock, I know it's a stretch for you, but please try to not continue to make the same mistakes over and over again.
#1. Jersey isn't Mormon, not now, not ever. Anyone with half a brain that's been paying the least bit of attention would know that.
#2. Your anti-female comments are duly noted. And we don't forget.
#3. I know Jersey in real life. She may be vertically challenged, but her ass is tiny.
Try to curb your stupidity (and your alcohol intake) when you post here. You make the males of the species look more laughable and pathetic than any Mormon prophet ever did (and we all know how much I love and revere Mormon prophets).
Thanks harm. I knew I could count on you to testify regarding my ass!
That's right antishock, harmony's SEEN my ass! Ain't nothing like eye witness testimony!
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Chinese Proverb
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 2425
- Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:02 am
Re: Question for Atheists: Abortion
harmony wrote:Antishock, I know it's a stretch for you, but please try to not continue to make the same mistakes over and over again.
#1. Jersey isn't Mormon, not now, not ever. Anyone with half a brain that's been paying the least bit of attention would know that.
#2. Your anti-female comments are duly noted. And we don't forget.
#3. I know Jersey in real life. She may be vertically challenged, but her ass is tiny.
Try to curb your stupidity (and your alcohol intake) when you post here. You make the males of the species look more laughable and pathetic than any Mormon prophet ever did (and we all know how much I love and revere Mormon prophets).
Harmony,
1) I've never paid attention to Jersey Girl. Ever. So I wouldn't know that she's not a Mormon since... You know... This is a Mormon Discussion board. Again. My bad. Now I know that some crazy bitch is posting on a Mormon Discussion board and she's not Mormon. Duly noted.
2) Yes yes. I'm anti-female. Thank you for pointing that out to me.
3) The odds that Jersey Girl is thin are about the same as YOU being thin. It would be zero. Not size zero. But donut-zero.
Look. She pops up to throw a few insults my way because she doesn't like my point of view. Rather than address the issue she addressed me. She has yet to post anything substantive to counter what I've posted. Sorry to break it to you, but Jersey Girl is a potato. There you go.
----------------
New Jersey Girl (that says it all right there),
How you can see a picture of two young men, products of your worldview, fighting away, and not have the introspective ability to re-think the ridiculous notion that you've insinuated, ie, "let 'em breed", is stunning.
Please let us know, you fat cow, when you've bought your tickets to Africa, and are going to start distributing food in one of those food centers you've sponsored, since you know, that's how to solve the problem of young African kids starving to death, getting raped, mauled by wild animals, shot, and sold off in slavery over scarce resources. Good for you!
Meanwhile, I'm sure it's a shame to ruin such beautiful blonde hair by dying your roots black. You're classy. Stay that way.
You can’t trust adults to tell you the truth.
Scream the lie, whisper the retraction.- The Left
Scream the lie, whisper the retraction.- The Left
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 18195
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am
Re: Question for Atheists: Abortion
antishock8 wrote:3) The odds that Jersey Girl is thin are about the same as YOU being thin. It would be zero. Not size zero. But donut-zero.
Goes to show that stupidity, while legendary, can still be added upon.
Not all women are the same size, shocky. That's why there's so many dress sizes to choose from. I'm on one end of the spectrum; Jersey's on the other. She has trouble buying jammies that don't have feet in them.
Size has nothing to do with brain though, as evidenced by your posts.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 34407
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am
Re: Question for Atheists: Abortion
harmony wrote: She has trouble buying jammies that don't have feet in them.
That is why I'm often seen wearing boxers that have words "Jersey Girl" plastered on my fine ass.
http://www.jerseygirlusa.com/jgirl-lightwt.html
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Chinese Proverb
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 34407
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am
Re: Question for Atheists: Abortion
antishock8 wrote:
Harmony,
1) I've never paid attention to Jersey Girl. Ever. So I wouldn't know that she's not a Mormon since... You know... This is a Mormon Discussion board. Again. My bad. Now I know that some crazy bitch is posting on a Mormon Discussion board and she's not Mormon. Duly noted.
Really? Who wrote this post to me?
http://mormondiscussions.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=188158#p188158
They are pretty relevant. I think I understand your "outsider" status. I feel that way in many cases. I'm equally at ease criticizing Mormons and non-Mormons.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Chinese Proverb
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 2425
- Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:02 am
Re: Question for Atheists: Abortion
Oh. Look at that. I responded to New Jersey Girl on the self-congratulatory exmo-social thread. Ok. Thank you for the reminder. Goes to show you how memorable New Jersey Girl is to someone like me... Not.
Let's review the sequence of events since New Jersey Girl's Valtrex isn't kicking in yet, and she's clearly fussy.
1) Dart asked Atheists if it's wrong to keep a baby with Downs Syndrome. I respond with something to the effect, "If it floats your boat, go for it."
2) Then religionists started to post something to the effect, "Atheists are evil devils who are evil. And devils."
3) I responded with a picture of a vulture getting ready to peck a little girl to death. My position is an all-knowing god can't help but know what it creates and what the ultimate fate of its creations are. Therefore that god is evil and the Devil. Not the Atheists who simply want to prevent MORE sum-total human misery from happening through birth control and abortion.
4) Religionists respond with, "You're evil, and the Devil."
5) Thread was pretty much dead, and then...
6) New Jersey Girl jumps in with, "YOU'RE EVIL, AND THE DEVIL, AND YOU'RE STUPID, TOO!! NA NA NA NA!!!" Oh, and she starts with the fat talk. Sweet.
7) I respond thoughtfully, and tell her that she needs to check herself befo' she wrecks herself.
8) New Jersey Girl, still completely missing the point, and unable to discuss the issue, responds with, "You're still the Devil and you're even more stupid than before and I'm still, like, way totally more smarter than you." Harmony joins in and says, "Yeah!"
9) I respond, who is this crazy bitch?
10) Apparently I'm chauvinist, and Crazy Bitch finds one response (maybe there's more?) I made to her on the exmo-social thread. NJG not understanding that she's making my point, which is, that she's so forgettable I actually forgot having interacted with her. My bad.
------------------
So, is this what she does? Does she ever engage the topic rather than mostly resorting to ad hom? I don't really care, but since she made herself known to me I'm interested in knowing what her deal is. Regardless, it still doesn't change the points that have been made, and she refuses to address:
1) God knows all, and is all-powerful.
2) God creates.
3) His creations do what they're designed to do.
4) Who is ultimately responsible under that paradigm?
My contention is Man, for the believer, is simply doing what it is supposed to do under those circumstances. Therefore it's God, and the Believer who implements His desires, who continue the miserable state of existence for billions.
What a shame. It doesn't have to be that way, and for someone like New Jersey Girl to prostitute herself to those notions in order to feel comfortable with the reality of her existence is offensive. It's extremely offensive that she defends a system that begets misery, when we have the actual ability to stop it.
Let's review the sequence of events since New Jersey Girl's Valtrex isn't kicking in yet, and she's clearly fussy.
1) Dart asked Atheists if it's wrong to keep a baby with Downs Syndrome. I respond with something to the effect, "If it floats your boat, go for it."
2) Then religionists started to post something to the effect, "Atheists are evil devils who are evil. And devils."
3) I responded with a picture of a vulture getting ready to peck a little girl to death. My position is an all-knowing god can't help but know what it creates and what the ultimate fate of its creations are. Therefore that god is evil and the Devil. Not the Atheists who simply want to prevent MORE sum-total human misery from happening through birth control and abortion.
4) Religionists respond with, "You're evil, and the Devil."
5) Thread was pretty much dead, and then...
6) New Jersey Girl jumps in with, "YOU'RE EVIL, AND THE DEVIL, AND YOU'RE STUPID, TOO!! NA NA NA NA!!!" Oh, and she starts with the fat talk. Sweet.
7) I respond thoughtfully, and tell her that she needs to check herself befo' she wrecks herself.
8) New Jersey Girl, still completely missing the point, and unable to discuss the issue, responds with, "You're still the Devil and you're even more stupid than before and I'm still, like, way totally more smarter than you." Harmony joins in and says, "Yeah!"
9) I respond, who is this crazy bitch?
10) Apparently I'm chauvinist, and Crazy Bitch finds one response (maybe there's more?) I made to her on the exmo-social thread. NJG not understanding that she's making my point, which is, that she's so forgettable I actually forgot having interacted with her. My bad.
------------------
So, is this what she does? Does she ever engage the topic rather than mostly resorting to ad hom? I don't really care, but since she made herself known to me I'm interested in knowing what her deal is. Regardless, it still doesn't change the points that have been made, and she refuses to address:
1) God knows all, and is all-powerful.
2) God creates.
3) His creations do what they're designed to do.
4) Who is ultimately responsible under that paradigm?
My contention is Man, for the believer, is simply doing what it is supposed to do under those circumstances. Therefore it's God, and the Believer who implements His desires, who continue the miserable state of existence for billions.
What a shame. It doesn't have to be that way, and for someone like New Jersey Girl to prostitute herself to those notions in order to feel comfortable with the reality of her existence is offensive. It's extremely offensive that she defends a system that begets misery, when we have the actual ability to stop it.
You can’t trust adults to tell you the truth.
Scream the lie, whisper the retraction.- The Left
Scream the lie, whisper the retraction.- The Left
Re: Question for Atheists: Abortion
Jersey Girl wrote:
How about you comment on that, GoodK??
OK.
Instead of taking Dart to task for creating this thread, why don't you take a gander at what antishock has done here and comment on THAT, GoodK?
Well, I could do that too, I guess. Antishock hasn't created thread after thread about Sarah Palin. I mean this obsession with Sarah Palin is concerning. I'd be very surprised if he has commented on anything except Miss Palin since August 29.
You wanna see ugly? Check out antishock's position that people who live in underdeveloped countries should be sterilized
I saw this from antishock when I originally posted:
if the family wants to live a lifetime of challenge with a retarded life, then it's its choice. More power to them. However, if they don't, who are we to judge them? Kind of assholesish if you ask me.
I don't find it particularly objectionable.
and their children KILLED, but not before we take a PHOTO of the children, instead of feeding them!
I doubt he meant that.
But if you'd like my official opinion on that - I don't believe in killing poor starving children. Or forced sterilization. Or killing mentally handicapped children. That is absurd.
You see, that's his response to the "myth" that believers subscribe to.
???
What myth? The whole Christianity thing?