It started to "SPROUT" some evidences of mistakes on made general translation procedure made with the CARACTORS LIST and also with the KINDERHOOK PLATES. Thus they are being revised character by character, carefully, slowly. And some WORDS are appearing from it.
Thus contrarily to my personal believe, the list believed to have only CHARACTERS have shown to have some WORDS (maybe even some "phrases"???): to be evaluated. Thus I was "forced" to revise my biased first hand conclusions.
In fact Joseph Smith's CARACTORS LIST and KINDERHOOK PLATES have several points in common, quite like following some same principles, philosophy and purposes, from Ancient days. Quite for keeping secret and in suspension some information that were to be well searched but toward the wrong direction and goals by the wrong Wises of Zion.
We can see that the very start of the Document "Headed" with the Title of CARACTORS, by the very hand of Joseph Smith, was a mixture of SEVERAL DISTINCT CHARACTERS, quite like CLUMPED as if just one.
http://www.mediafire.com/imgbnc.php/836edd477c7ed10609521e6bc133cce4969b945c3566f6933e02aaae2b1472ae6g.jpg
CLICK on URL and see the IMAGE very much enlarged. You can see that Joseph Smith did quite like with REAL INTENTION, since the very beginning, to make the document CARACTORS very "obscure" for ZION's WISES of SLC, quite like academics of BYU and FAIR and similar in opposition... We can understand very similar techniques were used in KINDERHOOK. Thus both were "misunderstood" documents for intellectual people.

It was very clear real INTENTION of Joseph Smith when put SHADOWS on the exact nature of the "CARACTORS" as a document to not be UNVEILED (also the true Geography of Book of Mormon) by the type of Zion's Wiser and others, for them remain OBSCURE. When in fact Caractors were something alike KINDERHOOK CHARACTERS in nature, quite alike having use of SUPERIMPOSITION and use of DUMB lines in relation to a given Character being evaluated. All that foolished Zion's Wises, that could never IMAGINE that CARAC would be ancestor of "Latin/French-Portuguese CARACtere " and nothing to some to do, but much less, with English "CHARAC": English is a much corrupted Nephitic language. As Nephitic and Sabellicus once were just one language... corrupt added toward all branches, ways, ITI-neraries along language corruption. What about the meanings of the first WORD found in the list provided in the document "CARACTERS", written by JOSEPH SMITH?
It is written in the 5th position CHARACTERS, from left to right since the start of the document CARACTORS. It is very clearly written I-T-i, with the entire 3 CHARACTERS quite like well "welded" on the branches of the "middle character", one "t". It is quite like a lower case "t"and its "foot" extremity points to the right. That suggests that such writer was writing from left to the right, contrary to my opinion. Maybe it was indifferent if it was to write to one or other direction, but there are some letters (as L) pointing toward the left... But the general inclination of the letters is toward the right: writing was to right...
The translation, now in so greatest enlargement for each character, is not more being made in the sequence A to Z, but is going in parallel for all characters, and even translating also Kinderhook all together.
http://www.mediafire.com/imgbnc.php/2527e3e2e12709709bc7054d1b68a53fa880dba25aba31c653addaccc203831c6g.jpg
VERY ENLARGED IMAGE if you click on previous URL
