Falling out between Dehlin and Kate Kelly?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Lemmie
_Emeritus
Posts: 10590
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:25 pm

Re: Falling out between Dehlin and Kate Kelly?

Post by _Lemmie »

Lemmie wrote:That could explain my lack of experience with it, I suppose. I do know single men and women would be told not to despair, they would eventually be assigned a companion in heaven; having been steeped in Mormon culture from birth it probably went right over my head how odd it was if the presumptive norm for that afterlife companionship for women was polygamous.

Kishkumen wrote:That and maybe people know you are not sympathetic to the idea of polygamy? I don't know. All I can tell you is that I have personally witnessed, on more than one occasion, single women, divorced or never married, talk about the possibility of being some handsome, active LDS guy's plural spouse in the hereafter. My mother thinks polygamy was false and a huge mistake, so she dismissed such chatter right away.

So you hear it because people think you are sympathetic to the idea? What are you, a double agent? :lol: Just kidding. I'm with your Mom.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Falling out between Dehlin and Kate Kelly?

Post by _Kishkumen »

Lemmie wrote:So you hear it because people think you are sympathetic to the idea? What are you, a double agent? :lol: Just kidding. I'm with your Mom.


LOL! Touche!
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Falling out between Dehlin and Kate Kelly?

Post by _Kishkumen »

Lemmie wrote:...minimizing other's experiences....


Let's call a spade a spade. Minimizing is not accurate. Ignoring, neglecting, and thereby dismissing--these words more accurately describe her response.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Lemmie
_Emeritus
Posts: 10590
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:25 pm

Re: Falling out between Dehlin and Kate Kelly?

Post by _Lemmie »

Kishkumen wrote:
Lemmie wrote:...minimizing other's experiences....


Let's call a spade a spade. Minimizing is not accurate. Ignoring, neglecting, and thereby dismissing--these words more accurately describe her response.

Agreed. I stand corrected.
_Fifth Columnist
_Emeritus
Posts: 396
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 7:08 pm

Re: Falling out between Dehlin and Kate Kelly?

Post by _Fifth Columnist »

Kishkumen wrote:
Dr. Shades wrote:With all due respect. . . you have GOT to be kidding, sir.

What evidence or anecdotes do you have that led you to believe this?


What do you make of the fact that YOU were the only person to question this?

I'm with Shades. I've never heard or experienced what you described. Who's anecdote is right, mine or yours? I have no idea.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Falling out between Dehlin and Kate Kelly?

Post by _Kishkumen »

Fifth Columnist wrote:I'm with Shades. I've never heard or experienced what you described. Who's anecdote is right, mine or yours? I have no idea.


I think if you spend a little time reflecting on the legacy of polygamy in Mormon culture you will see this is a no-brainer. If it were not a thing, someone would have to make it up because the situation is so ripe for the possibility.

Still, it actually is a thing.
Last edited by Guest on Tue May 23, 2017 4:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_toon
_Emeritus
Posts: 522
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2015 5:13 am

Re: Falling out between Dehlin and Kate Kelly?

Post by _toon »

Kishkumen wrote:
Dr. Shades wrote:With all due respect. . . you have GOT to be kidding, sir.

What evidence or anecdotes do you have that led you to believe this?


What do you make of the fact that YOU were the only person to question this?


I questioned, as well as other points in that post, but didn't comment, until now. I was too entertained with the other direction that the thread went.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Falling out between Dehlin and Kate Kelly?

Post by _Kishkumen »

OK. I get, I get it. Apparently a number of you were unaware that some LDS women do size up men in their wards in polygamy fantasies. I stand corrected.

But, yes, it is a thing.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_toon
_Emeritus
Posts: 522
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2015 5:13 am

Re: Falling out between Dehlin and Kate Kelly?

Post by _toon »

It may be a thing. I can't dispute that. But that doesn't mean it's a "huge part of Mormon culture."
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Falling out between Dehlin and Kate Kelly?

Post by _Kishkumen »

toon wrote:It may be a thing. I can't dispute that. But that doesn't mean it's a "huge part of Mormon culture."


Who said that women sizing up men in polygamy fantasies was, in itself, a huge part of Mormon culture?

I did not. It is, however, one example of an array of interesting expressions of sexuality (and its repression) that springs from the legacy of polygamy. If I had a dime for every time an LDS guy made a casual comment about that lady he would welcome into a polygamous marriage if given the opportunity.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
Post Reply