Rules and Moderator information

[canpakes]

Two more posts, now.

What’s wrong with suggesting dinner with Shades? You did that once and Shades posted a pic of it. Should I pretend that didn’t happen, either?

Maybe I can get you one of those little pen things with the flashing red light on it that they have in the movie ‘Men in Black’. Fair warning, though, it probably won’t actually erase anyone’s memory for you.

[Marcus]

This post by canpakes is epic:

Binger, I’m going to combine a response to two posts as it’s more efficient.

I will address this in more detail, in parts. Suffice it to say, that, like most your posts, this is just another goddamn lie. Well, not just a lie, it is also a delusion. Maybe your predictions were actually little wee man prophecies and you were doing all you could to fulfill them, including telling lies like the one you are telling here, panny.

Nope. 100% not a lie. It’s absolutely true.

Take Shades out to dinner, and ask him to view the mod forum. Bring up every post I’ve ever made there. It will confirm that my predictions about you have always been spot on. It will also confirm that I’ve been in your corner and against banning on several occasions. But you’ve never been able to rise above your control issues and grievances about this board, and that has resulted in at least two account wipes (by who, I don’t know).

If you were correct and I was wrong, then this history of yours would not exist. Yet there it is.

Hound is not putting me in a box.

He did. And you’ve already contradicted his ‘belief’. Good job.

You have been wrong about pretty much everything. I am not sure why, even in light of the events of the last few days, you insist on lying, picking these battles, and losing. I just don't understand. I also have ZFTG about whether you will ever understand. I suspect Hound is right - you can't separate moderating (the actual thread topic) from your petty game and little man angst that makes you want to do something to those so-called big bullies out there.

This paragraph is insightful, as you’re demonstrating that you think that this is either a game or a contest. To me, it’s neither. The board is a community of individuals who have a history together, and that history has resulted in a sort of prevailing political sensibility that rubs you and the ‘Mike’ accounts the wrong way. That, and your grudge against Doc after the two of you went at it in your ME days has driven your behavior for several years.

You are, as always, remarkably consistent with your projection. The difference between us is that you’re locked in a battle against several ghosts that I don’t care about. At the end of the day, not moderating anything is much easier than taking a chance on not getting the ‘Shades clone’ task correct, but I’ll take the chance on the latter if it helps this board community to function better.

You selected that quote. And, dishonestly, you edited the context out. For someone that had a meltdown over an emoji in a quote, you took it one step further and just went full scale dishonest on the joint, didn't you?

No. Here again, your projection traps you.

1. It’s your actual quote.
2. The quote links back to the full rant from you. Clicking on the adorable little arrow lets everyone see it all. You’re going to mention the same thing below.
3. There is nothing dishonest about quoting you, aside from whatever dishonesty is resident in your own quote.
4. Not adding your entire rant is not dishonest as your quote stands on its own regardless of any other portion of the your rant. Quoting the relevant part of a post is completely acceptable when the focus is on that part, and when the quote is presented in whole.

Here is the rest of the paragraph. The full response, from 2021 FFS, is available in the little arrow link.

As noted above.

The ONLY thing that matters on this board is my entertainment. That is it. Nothing else matters. And that is true for every person on this board and for every person in every role on this board. Including the founder. Including the moderators. [emphasis added] Including that bigot Gadianton and whatever he does here.

Now, here’s the weird part. After ranting about how it’s dishonest to present a partial quote, you have just partially quoted your own post.

As usual, thanks for proving my point for me.

Later, you doubled down on your lie.



I do not see the board as my own personal entertainment at the expense of others. I never said that. I don't believe that.

You have literally stated it and now quoted yourself doing so.

I am not carrying out grudges against people that disagree with me. I don't have any way of carrying out a grudge, you ding dong.

I disagree. Your previous behavior on the board shows your issues, and I’m pretty convinced that your future actions will, as well.

As it is, we haven’t even made it past morning and already you’re three posts in to ranting about … me.

Your lie, or conclusion not based in fact or whatever Res calls it, is nothing but raw projection and confession, panny. You are making things up about me and likely doing the same regarding Hound and anyone else you have a grudge with, and moderating accordingly. Stop that crap. And yes, I would suggest you stop moderating if needling, picking fights and lying to and about posters is more entertaining to you.

Again, the history of the board presents differently than your breathless protests here. If you were at all able to be the person that you claim to be, that history would not be what it is and there wouldn’t be three new posts from you ranting about it.

As for your post to Shades imposing conditions on exceptions for your behavior … if you claim these conditions as necessary, then you can be held to exactly the same conditions. You’ll need to revamp your approach. ; )

[Whiskey]

This post by canpakes is epic:

Why and how?

[Marcus]

Especially this:

This paragraph is insightful, as you’re demonstrating that you think that this is either a game or a contest. To me, it’s neither. The board is a community of individuals who have a history together, and that history has resulted in a sort of prevailing political sensibility that rubs you and the ‘Mike’ accounts the wrong way. That, and your grudge against Doc after the two of you went at it in your ME days has driven your behavior for several years.

You are, as always, remarkably consistent with your projection. The difference between us is that you’re locked in a battle against several ghosts that I don’t care about. At the end of the day, not moderating anything is much easier than taking a chance on not getting the ‘Shades clone’ task correct, but I’ll take the chance on the latter if it helps this board community to function better.

Well said. Thank you to our long-suffering moderator.

[Hound of Heaven]

Moderators

Apparently Can'tpakes banned Whiskey for a week for using the C word numerous times. So can one of the three of you please explain why DrCamnPP is allowed to call Whiskey "Whiskeydick" without getting banned, or why DrCamnPP is allowed to tell me to suck my own dick, without getting banned?

Why the double standard?

If DrCamnPP is allowed to use the word dick and bitch, can I start using the C word, and if not, why?



How is this allowed, but Whiskey is banned for using the C word?

[Hound of Heaven]

Can'tpakes. Here's the fourth off topic spam post by DrCamnPP that he has posted in one thread. Why are you not banning him the same way you banned Whiskey? Why are you allowing DrCamnPP to use the words bitch and dick, but you ban Whiskey for using the C word?

[Marcus]

Maybe a mod can correct me if I'm wrong, but Shades overturned Whiskey's ban, yes?

[canpakes]

Maybe a mod can correct me if I'm wrong, but Shades overturned Whiskey's ban, yes?

Correct.

Besides, the Hound account is just a proxy for Binger, as he mentioned earlier. I’m not sure why that game is still being played, but it speaks to ‘dishonesty’, which Binger claims to be concerned with.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[Res Ipsa]

Maybe a mod can correct me if I'm wrong, but Shades overturned Whiskey's ban, yes?

I’m not a mod, but Shades overturned the ban.

[Hound of Heaven]

Maybe a mod can correct me if I'm wrong, but Shades overturned Whiskey's ban, yes?

I’m not a mod, but Shades overturned the ban.

Shades did not overturn Whiskey's first ban. We was apparently banned a few weeks ago for using the C word.

My question is why DrCamnPP is allowed to call Whiskey "Whiskeydick" and bitch, but Whiskey was banned for using the C word. But Can'tpakes won't answer because he can't!