http://www.mormonapologetics.org/index. ... opic=29810
mbeesley, after posting about how the Lord instructed Moses to lie about how long they would wander in the wilderness:
hanks for your thoughts, and all the others.
One reason I posted this was that LDS are consistently accused of countenancing "Lying for the Lord," and it appears to me from this incident that rather than being a negative, lying for the Lord is righteous action. Isn't it great that we have holy scriptures, like the Bible and Book of Mormon, so when some self-righteous, self-appointed "minister of Christ" throws the accusation of "lying for the Lord" at us, we can simply shrug our shoulders and respond with a resounding, "So what?"
Another example that I find intriguing is in John 7 where Christ tells his brothers he's not going to go to the feast of the tabernacle and sends them away. Christ subsequently does go to the feast, but does something so he is not recognized.
It brings to mind a comment I made once at Concerned Christians, which has made its way into the tagline of an ex-LDS anti-Mormon poster there who, for some reason or other, seems to think that the statement was outrageous. I said,
QUOTE
We are not convinced of Joseph Smith's prophethood because of anything of he said or did. We are convinced because our Father in Heaven has revealed to each of us, individually, that Joseph Smith was His prophet. Thus, we are convinced of his prophethood in spite of anything he may have said or done.
With that kind of certitude about the divine calling of the Prophet, who cares if he is accused of lying by the infidels.
Gotta love the infidels touch!!