Would a President Romney do what Salt Lake City told him to?
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 397
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 3:21 pm
Would a President Romney do what Salt Lake City told him to?
I was talking with a friend of mine who is completely against Mitt Romney because he thinks that, as a full-fledged Mormon, Mitt would in essence be taking orders from the Prophet in SLC. We would basically have a Theocracy at that point.
So, for instance, if the Prophet said "God wants you to nuke England" (again, my friend's words, not mine), then Romney would have to do it. Otherwise, he's disobeying God.
No, I don't think that would happen, but it does show that others out there are having these sorts of discussions.
What do you think?
So, for instance, if the Prophet said "God wants you to nuke England" (again, my friend's words, not mine), then Romney would have to do it. Otherwise, he's disobeying God.
No, I don't think that would happen, but it does show that others out there are having these sorts of discussions.
What do you think?
"What does God need with a starship?" - Captain James T. Kirk
Most people would like to be delivered from temptation but would like it to keep in touch. - Robert Orben
Most people would like to be delivered from temptation but would like it to keep in touch. - Robert Orben
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4597
- Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:57 pm
Re: Would a President Romney do what Salt Lake City told him
ozemc wrote:I was talking with a friend of mine who is completely against Mitt Romney because he thinks that, as a full-fledged Mormon, Mitt would in essence be taking orders from the Prophet in SLC. We would basically have a Theocracy at that point.
So, for instance, if the Prophet said "God wants you to nuke England" (again, my friend's words, not mine), then Romney would have to do it. Otherwise, he's disobeying God.
No, I don't think that would happen, but it does show that others out there are having these sorts of discussions.
What do you think?
If Reid can vote against the gay marriage ban without ecclesiastical repercussions (other than kooky former stake pres. Howard's letter), I imagine Romney will be able to march to his own smarmy drum beat.
"Some people never go crazy. What truly horrible lives they must lead." ~Charles Bukowski
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 3679
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:25 am
I was talking with a friend of mine who is completely against Mitt Romney because he thinks that, as a full-fledged Mormon, Mitt would in essence be taking orders from the Prophet in SLC. We would basically have a Theocracy at that point.
So, for instance, if the Prophet said "God wants you to nuke England" (again, my friend's words, not mine), then Romney would have to do it. Otherwise, he's disobeying God.
No, I don't think that would happen, but it does show that others out there are having these sorts of discussions.
What do you think?
I think we ought not to revisit the early sixties and the flap regarding JFK and Roman Catholicism.
Your friend is dumb.
The face of sin today often wears the mask of tolerance.
- Thomas S. Monson
- Thomas S. Monson
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 761
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 1:56 am
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4166
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:54 pm
I honestly don't see the first presidency asking Mitt to do anything. I've been very impressed at how the presidency makes it a point to stay out of politics.
That being said, this country is run by the special interest groups. Shouldn't we be more concerned about something like, say, the big oil companies asking GWB to start a war in the middle east so they can profit from increased oil prices?? I think SLC should be the last of our worries when it comes to people telling the president what to do.
That being said, this country is run by the special interest groups. Shouldn't we be more concerned about something like, say, the big oil companies asking GWB to start a war in the middle east so they can profit from increased oil prices?? I think SLC should be the last of our worries when it comes to people telling the president what to do.
If there's one thing I've learned from this board, it's that consensual sex with multiple partners is okay unless God commands it. - Abman
I find this place to be hostile toward all brands of stupidity. That's why I like it. - Some Schmo
I find this place to be hostile toward all brands of stupidity. That's why I like it. - Some Schmo
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1895
- Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:16 pm
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 523
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 2:42 am
Scottie wrote:I honestly don't see the first presidency asking Mitt to do anything. I've been very impressed at how the presidency makes it a point to stay out of politics.
Are you serious? They got very heavily involved with the Equal Rights Amendment, the Federal Marriage Amendment, etc. Benson was ranting and raving about the commies staging the Civil Rights movement and how half the people in the government are traitors in public speeches in his apostolic capacity. People were given assignments to write to their representatives about banning gay marriage. Total non-involvement.
Last edited by Guest on Fri Nov 30, 2007 11:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"reason and religion are friends and allies" - Mitt Romney
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1485
- Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 4:35 pm
Re: Would a President Romney do what Salt Lake City told him
ozemc wrote:What do you think?
It might depend on how he interprets certain oaths he's taken regarding consecration. Depending on how someone interpreted those, they might feel bound, or not.
A better question might be whether the church has any interest specifically in having a member in that position of leadership that would be beneficial to them, or whether a church state is something to be desired.
The road is beautiful, treacherous, and full of twists and turns.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4792
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:40 pm
If one holds to the idea that in the last days the Constitution will be hanging by a thread and that the "priesthood" will come in to save the United States, then maybe this is all part of the plan and Mitt as president is just the beginning.
;-)
~dancer~
;-)
~dancer~
"The search for reality is the most dangerous of all undertakings for it destroys the world in which you live." Nisargadatta Maharaj