The DCP of today

[_karl61]

cksalmon reponded to a post from Juliann which brought DCP's response:

The actual ignorance of trinitarian doctrine displayed here is quite notable.

DCP:

"Perhaps. "

"But on whose part?"

"The rise of the social Trinitarian model is a very encouraging development in Protestant and Catholic thought. Sometime before the end of this month, I intend to make some editorial adjustments to my Yale Divinity School paper of a few years ago, on Mormonism and the social Trinity, for publication in Element, the journal of the Society for Mormon Theology and Philosophy. You should be able to marvel at its brilliance and its insightfulness sometime during the first half of 2008."

I think he has lost it.

[_the road to hana]

Just as an aside, I imagine Julie means "Who's" as opposed to "Whose" in the title to that thread.

[_KimberlyAnn]

Just as an aside, I imagine Julie means "Who's" as opposed to "Whose" in the title to that thread.

Yeah, I caught that, too. It gave me a giggle.

Now, whose going to point it out on MAD? ;)

KA

[_Ray A]

Yeah, I caught that, too. It gave me a giggle.

Now, whose going to point it out on MAD? ;)

KA

That's a very simple mistake that anyone can make. It doesn't mean they're illiterate. I mean, what else are you people going to find fault with? Isn't this evidence of some kind of partisan obsession? Shall we look for grammatical errors in exmos, now?

Where shall we begin?

But, of course, I realise, and hope, your post was tugone-in-ckehe. No?

[_Jason Bourne]

cksalmon reponded to a post from Juliann which brought DCP's response:

The actual ignorance of trinitarian doctrine displayed here is quite notable.

DCP:

"Perhaps. "

"But on whose part?"

"The rise of the social Trinitarian model is a very encouraging development in Protestant and Catholic thought. Sometime before the end of this month, I intend to make some editorial adjustments to my Yale Divinity School paper of a few years ago, on Mormonism and the social Trinity, for publication in Element, the journal of the Society for Mormon Theology and Philosophy. You should be able to marvel at its brilliance and its insightfulness sometime during the first half of 2008."

I think he has lost it.

And just WHY do you think he has lost it. Do you know what he is talking about?

[_Some Schmo]

And just WHY do you think he has lost it. [sic]

Good question. Why would people assume he had it in the first place?

[_KimberlyAnn]

I mean, what else are you people going to find fault with?

[snip]

Where shall we begin?

Ray, let us begin with the preposition at the end of your sentence. ;)

Juliann is obnoxious. It's fun to point out her grammatical errors. Would you deny me that thrill? Surely not!

Believe me, I make plenty of errors myself. I know that. We all do, including ex-Mormons. But Juliann, she's just a rude, nasty woman. I always imagine her with a furrowed brow and pinched, ugly expression on her face--like Judge Judy on a really bad day. I think she deserves the correction. She's begging for it!

KA

[_Infymus]

You should be able to marvel at its brilliance and its insightfulness

And he wonders why I asked if he called out his own name during sex.

Pompous windbag.

[_Ray A]

Ray, let us begin with the preposition at the end of your sentence. ;)

What proposition?

Juliann is obnoxious. It's fun to point out her grammatical errors. Would you deny me that thrill? Surely not!

Pointing out grammatical errors in your enemy, while ignoring them in your friend, can be as definitive as describing the difference between a fart, and a burp. No one objects to the smell of their own farts.

Believe me, I make plenty of errors myself. I know that.

I'm a total believer.

We all do, including ex-Mormons.

Do what?

But Juliann, she's just a rude, nasty woman. I always imagine her with a furrowed brow and pinched, ugly expression on her face--like Judge Judy on a really bad day. I think she deserves the correction. She's begging for it!

KA

Have you not read the Book of Mormon? We should be kind, even to beggars.

[_Mister Scratch]

I mean, what else are you people going to find fault with?

[snip]

Where shall we begin?

Ray, let us begin with the preposition at the end of your sentence. ;)

Juliann is obnoxious. It's fun to point out her grammatical errors. Would you deny me that thrill? Surely not!

Believe me, I make plenty of errors myself. I know that. We all do, including ex-Mormons. But Juliann, she's just a rude, nasty woman. I always imagine her with a furrowed brow and pinched, ugly expression on her face--like Judge Judy on a really bad day. I think she deserves the correction. She's begging for it!

KA

Don't mind Ray, KA. He seems to have come down with whatever Wade Englund was suffering from---i.e., he thinks that "mirroring," or lecturing, or whatever else is going to somehow "change" critics of Mormonism.