Just got silenced over at MAD again. This is 3 time in the last year. Guess I just cann't help but be naughty. I guess they just don't like my point of view. I would have like to seen what the reason for my bannishment. My last comments over there was in responce to someone question about copyright. I suggested that if they were concerned about copyright to their ideas expressed on MAD that maybe all there comment on MAD should be put in quotes and a your own copyright notice attached, such as:
these are my thoughts and ideas.... Copyright 2008 by mocnarf
I don't see why this would get me banned but maybe I am a bad influence of there.
I was wondering how many time others have been silenced at MAD in the last year?
You didn't give an option for those of us who have never been banned. Because I can't answer (and therefore can't vote), I can't see the results unless I log out and view this thread as a visitor.
mocnarf wrote:Just got silenced over at MAD again. This is 3 time in the last year. Guess I just cann't help but be naughty. I guess they just don't like my point of view. I would have like to seen what the reason for my bannishment. My last comments over there was in responce to someone question about copyright. I suggested that if they were concerned about copyright to their ideas expressed on MAD that maybe all there comment on MAD should be put in quotes and a your own copyright notice attached, such as:
these are my thoughts and ideas.... Copyright 2008 by mocnarf
I don't see why this would get me banned but maybe I am a bad influence of there.
Are you sure that's why you were banned, Mocnarf? I notice that Prof. Peterson has seen fit to ridicule you for your BKP signature line.... Perhaps that's why you were banned?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
Always Thinking wrote:You didn't give an option for those of us who have never been banned. Because I can't answer (and therefore can't vote), I can't see the results unless I log out and view this thread as a visitor.
Sorry.... your right that should have been an option. I tryed to edit but it doesn't appear that poll option can not be added to once the poll is created.
mocnarf wrote:Just got silenced over at MAD again. This is 3 time in the last year. Guess I just cann't help but be naughty. I guess they just don't like my point of view. I would have like to seen what the reason for my bannishment. My last comments over there was in responce to someone question about copyright. I suggested that if they were concerned about copyright to their ideas expressed on MAD that maybe all there comment on MAD should be put in quotes and a your own copyright notice attached, such as:
these are my thoughts and ideas.... Copyright 2008 by mocnarf
I don't see why this would get me banned but maybe I am a bad influence of there.
Are you sure that's why you were banned, Mocnarf? I notice that Prof. Peterson has seen fit to ridicule you for your BKP signature line.... Perhaps that's why you were banned?
I have had that signature line for quite sometime. One of that last things I did over their was to change my signature line to include my copyright notice to any thoughts I express. The only other area that may have cause a problem is my comments on Tarski's post over at MAD that got him banned. They just don't have any sense of humor. ya know what I mean...?
Hello,
I have been permently banned from the "FAIR"/MA&D Message Board. The Moderators at the MA&D Message Board, don't even want me to be able to view their, message Board, however I am very able to view the MA&D Message Board on my new IP Address on my new computer here.
"And I've said it before, you want to know what Joseph Smith looked like in Nauvoo, just look at Trump." - Fence Sitter
mocnarf wrote:Just got silenced over at MAD again. This is 3 time in the last year. Guess I just cann't help but be naughty. I guess they just don't like my point of view. I would have like to seen what the reason for my bannishment. My last comments over there was in responce to someone question about copyright. I suggested that if they were concerned about copyright to their ideas expressed on MAD that maybe all there comment on MAD should be put in quotes and a your own copyright notice attached, such as:
these are my thoughts and ideas.... Copyright 2008 by mocnarf
I don't see why this would get me banned but maybe I am a bad influence of there.
I was wondering how many time others have been silenced at MAD in the last year?
Dude, I thought you were kinda moderate, I even thought you were active. I saw you there so often.
I'm surprised DCP decided to hack you. I guess you deserved to be hacked.
But being silenced by DCP means not much, the man's yoke is unbearable, I bet feels like he has dozen leashes
on his throat. It is not easy to serve all these masters and being abused constantly by your likes.
Some people go on there with the expectation of being tossed and as such act outrageously. Others are genuinely surprised when they are suspended or banned. It doesn't have to make sense because they are private enterprise and can do any capricious action they please. They are only accountable to the Lord or his chosen representatives.