2006 CHI now up on WikiLeaks ....

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_John Larsen
_Emeritus
Posts: 1895
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:16 pm

Re: 2006 CHI now up on WikiLeaks ....

Post by _John Larsen »

Rollo Tomasi wrote:Why anyone would want to work for the Church is beyond me.

I think a lot of people agree with you. I know that they have a difficult time attracting software engineers and other technical positions. Even the LDS one's don't want anything to do with the job.
_TAK
_Emeritus
Posts: 1555
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 4:47 pm

Re: 2006 CHI now up on WikiLeaks ....

Post by _TAK »

I worked in the MTC in Provo for nearly a year.. what a horrible depressing place - oddly when I was there they were paying just a bit more than average wage- I was told so they could leverage greater control over the staff..
God has the right to create and to destroy, to make like and to kill. He can delegate this authority if he wishes to. I know that can be scary. Deal with it.
Nehor.. Nov 08, 2010


_________________
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: 2006 CHI now up on WikiLeaks ....

Post by _harmony »

TAK wrote:I worked in the MTC in Provo for nearly a year.. what a horrible depressing place - oddly when I was there they were paying just a bit more than average wage- I was told so they could leverage greater control over the staff..


Somehow I had the impression that the wages might be similiar to similiar jobs in the non-church sector, but that the benefits... ie, insurance, retirement, PTO... sucked.




.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Mercury
_Emeritus
Posts: 5545
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:14 pm

Re: 2006 CHI now up on WikiLeaks ....

Post by _Mercury »

John Larsen wrote:
Rollo Tomasi wrote:Why anyone would want to work for the Church is beyond me.

I think a lot of people agree with you. I know that they have a difficult time attracting software engineers and other technical positions. Even the LDS one's don't want anything to do with the job.


I sat next to one of the software drones who worked in the COB. He was arrogant, uneducated and strangely -ahem- cultish about his pet VB skills. I chatted him up about open source software and he didn't have a clue what I was talking about.

Morans.
And crawling on the planet's face
Some insects called the human race
Lost in time
And lost in space...and meaning
_Jason Bourne
_Emeritus
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm

Re: 2006 CHI now up on WikiLeaks ....

Post by _Jason Bourne »

Jason Bourne wrote:
I must say that this one always particularly bothered me. Especially considering the idea of ecclesiastically confidentiality. I always wondered if it was a condition of employment why not let the persons boss ask.


Simple solution, if you are uncomfortable with those rules, don't work for the Church. It's not as if they have a stranglehold on the jobs market


But why have the bishops squeal on them. If it is a condition of employment then why not have their boss ask them. Asking the bishop to report is asking the bishop to break confidence.
_Rollo Tomasi
_Emeritus
Posts: 4085
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:27 pm

Re: 2006 CHI now up on WikiLeaks ....

Post by _Rollo Tomasi »

Jason Bourne wrote:
Simple solution, if you are uncomfortable with those rules, don't work for the Church. It's not as if they have a stranglehold on the jobs market

But why have the bishops squeal on them. If it is a condition of employment then why not have their boss ask them. Asking the bishop to report is asking the bishop to break confidence.

I agree 100% -- it's all very unseemly.
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."

-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
Post Reply