wenglund wrote:Once again, I appreciate you unwittingly making my point.
I know you like to repeat this sentiment as though it's actually meaningful in some way, but it's just childish posturing. Perhaps you could try something a little more grown up (not that I hold out much hope)?
wenglund wrote: But, your version of "I know you are, but what am I" is wearing more than a little thin. Perhaps you could try something a little more grown up (not that I hold out much hope)?![]()
Thanks, -Wade Englund-
So, what you're essentially saying is that if someone accuses me of something they've demonstrated in spades over the years, I'm not allowed to call them on it because that would be a version of "I know you are, but what am I?" They get a pass for their hypocrisy because they said it first?
LOL... sure Wade.
The funny thing is, you didn't call me an idiot. You just said I didn't understand god's ways (or something idiotic like that). I started off by calling what you posted idiotic. Do you understand how that works?
Hey man, if you don't want to be called an idiot, don't say idiotic things. It's pretty straightforward.
Thanks, -Some Schmo-