Rambo wrote:Question Runtu,
What is your source for your example of the Partridge sisters. Is it from the journals or a third party?
I ask this because church leaders and bishops will say we don't really know what happened in the past.
I don't know to much about Joseph's polygamy but I do plan on getting "In Sacred Loneliness"
Eliza Partridge married Joseph on February 28, 1843, and her sister Emily married him four days later. Eliza wrote, “I cannot tell all Joseph said, but he said the Lord had commanded [him] to enter into plural marriage and had given me to him and although I had got badly frightened he knew I would yet have him.... Well I was married there and then. Joseph went home his way and I going my way alone. A strange way of getting married wasen’t it?”
Emily said that she and Joseph "roomed" together the night of their marriage and had "carnal intercourse." (Temple Lot case (complete transcript), 364, 367, 384; see also Foster,
Religion and Sexuality, 15.)
Benjamin Johnson wrote that in April, 1843, "The Prophet again Came and at my house occupied the Same Room & Bed with my Sister [Almera Johnson] that the month previous he had occupied with the Daughter of the Late Bishop Partridge.” (Zimmerman,
I Knew the Prophets, 44. See also "The Origin of Plural Marriage, Joseph F. Smith, Jr., Deseret News Press, page 70-71.)
So, it appears that Joseph consummated both of those marriages in March of 1843. Two months later, Joseph convinced Emma that she could not receive her temple endowment until she accepted plural marriage. She consented, as long as she could choose the wives; she chose Emily and Eliza, unaware that they had already married Joseph. Both sisters swore in published affidavits that they were married a second time on May 11, 1843 (see the
Historical Record, Vols 5-8, p. 223).
Emily wrote, "To save the family trouble Brother Joseph thought it best to have another ceremony performed...[Emma] had her feelings, and so we thought there was no use in saying anything about it so long as she had chosen us herself.... Accordingly ... we were sealed to Joseph Smith a second time, in Emma’s presence.”
I don't think the facts here are in dispute.