Newly Published Study on Same-Sex Parenting

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Daniel2
_Emeritus
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:57 pm

Newly Published Study on Same-Sex Parenting

Post by _Daniel2 »

So... in the wake of the LDS church's involvment of all the Prop 8 stuff and many Mormon's views on how inadequate same-sex parenting HAS to be, the following study (just published) is worthy of note:

Children of lesbian couples do well, study finds
Study tracks kids of same-sex couples from insemination

Reuters
updated 9:18 a.m. MT, Mon., June 7, 2010
Being raised by a same-sex couple is no hindrance to healthy psychological development, researchers say as the first generation of children conceived by lesbians through donor insemination is coming of age.

In fact, lesbian mothers rated their 17-year-olds higher in social and academic skills, and lower in rule-breaking and aggression, than did mothers of teenagers who also had a father.

The study, which appears in the journal Pediatrics, is the first to follow children of lesbian couples all the way from conception to adolescence.

"There are so many places in the United States where same-sex couples are not allowed to adopt or foster children in need," said Dr. Nanette Gartrell of the University of California, San Francisco, who started the so-called US National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study in 1986.

While opponents of same-sex parenting often mention cultural or religious values, some also contend that growing up with two moms or two dads can't be healthy for the child, said Gartrell.

But there isn't any solid evidence that homosexual parenting is any worse or better than its conventional counterpart, according to Gartrell, who is in a same-sex partnership.

"There is not a single study that has shown there are any problems in terms of psychological adjustment" of the child, she said. "The things we know that make for good parenting are love, resources and being very involved in your child's life."

The new findings are based on 77 families of both girls and boys. The researchers interviewed the lesbian mothers about their kids and then rated the teenagers on the Child Behavior Checklist, a standardized assessment that has been used for decades. Each teenager also filled out an internet-based psychological questionnaire.

When comparing the results to how mothers living in conventional families rated their teenagers, children of same-sex couples were more competent in school, had fewer social problems, broke fewer rules and were less aggressive.

Based on what the children reported themselves, they did just as well whether or not they knew the identity of their biological father.

However, those teenagers who — according to their mothers — experienced homophobia and bullying did turn out to be more anxious and have more depressive symptoms than their peers. It wasn't clear if the anxiety was a product of the bullying or if it was the other way around.

"What this data shows is that it's not the parenting that seems to be the issue," but rather the stigmatization, said Ian Rivers, a professor of human development at Brunel University in Uxbridge, England.

But he noted that homophobia was on the decline.

"We are starting to see a sea change," he said, adding that there was "an awareness in schools that homophobia is something that is inappropriate."

According to recent data, a good quarter million American children are living with same-sex parents. Rivers, who was not involved in the new study, said concerns about the children's well-being had not come true.

"These children have not faced many of the issues that critics of gay and lesbian parents say they should be facing," he told Reuters Health. "This is why this is such an important piece of work."

It is unclear why kids of same-sex couples would be in better psychological shape than those of heterosexual parents. While the researchers are still analyzing the internet questionnaires, Gartrell said one reason could be that lesbian mothers had planned their parenthood carefully and were prepared to help their children though any discrimination they might face.

"These were chosen children, they weren't accidents," Gartrell said.

Copyright 2010 Reuters. Click for restrictions.
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37553783/ns ... parenting/

MSN Privacy . Legal
© 2010 MSNBC.com


Darin
"Have compassion for everyone you meet even if they don't want it. What seems conceit, bad manners, or cynicism is always a sign of things no ears have heard, no eyes have seen. You do not know what wars are going on down there where the spirit meets the bone."--Miller Williams
_Yahoo Bot
_Emeritus
Posts: 3219
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 8:37 pm

Re: Newly Published Study on Same-Sex Parenting

Post by _Yahoo Bot »

And I cite back to you Witherspoon Institute, Marriage and the Public Good (Princeton, New Jersey: Witherspoon Institute, 2006), the most significant commentary in recent history on the subject of marriage, including gay marriage. Are you even familiar with this study?
_JohnStuartMill
_Emeritus
Posts: 1630
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 12:12 pm

Re: Newly Published Study on Same-Sex Parenting

Post by _JohnStuartMill »

Yahoo Bot wrote:And I cite back to you Witherspoon Institute, Marriage and the Public Good (Princeton, New Jersey: Witherspoon Institute, 2006), the most significant commentary in recent history on the subject of marriage, including gay marriage. Are you even familiar with this study?

You're absolutely right, Bob. We should definitely disregard the results of a peer-reviewed study published through an elite research university for the sole reason that they contradict conclusions drawn by a conservative think tank from inferior evidence. Good call there.
"You clearly haven't read [Dawkins'] book." -Kevin Graham, 11/04/09
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Re: Newly Published Study on Same-Sex Parenting

Post by _Gadianton »

Yahoo Bot wrote:And I cite back to you Witherspoon Institute, Marriage and the Public Good (Princeton, New Jersey: Witherspoon Institute, 2006), the most significant commentary in recent history on the subject of marriage, including gay marriage. Are you even familiar with this study?


LOL, seriously yahoo bot, you made me chuckle a little bit. It's the sincerity of your recommendation even though I grant the possibility you're half joking. I remember your Witherspoon study, I read the whole thing. If that's the quality of work the religious right is shooting for, no need spending all those big bucks on the "Whitherspoon" (who named the place anyway?) institute, I'm pretty sure just about any undergrad student enrolled at Princeton could come up with an equally compelling study for a term paper. You could probably get the rights for a couple hundred bucks.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
_Calculus Crusader
_Emeritus
Posts: 1495
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:52 am

Re: Newly Published Study on Same-Sex Parenting

Post by _Calculus Crusader »

I suspect this study features selection bias. It should also be noted that it was funded by homosexual advocacy groups, which is cause for close scrutiny.
Caeli enarrant gloriam Dei

(I lost access to my Milesius account, so I had to retrieve this one from the mothballs.)
_Calculus Crusader
_Emeritus
Posts: 1495
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:52 am

Re: Newly Published Study on Same-Sex Parenting

Post by _Calculus Crusader »

Not only was it funded by homosexual advocacy groups but Nanette Gartrell is a lesbian herself. (She is "married" to another lesbian activist. How quaint!) As I wrote previously, her study should be closely scrutinized.
Caeli enarrant gloriam Dei

(I lost access to my Milesius account, so I had to retrieve this one from the mothballs.)
_JohnStuartMill
_Emeritus
Posts: 1630
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 12:12 pm

Re: Newly Published Study on Same-Sex Parenting

Post by _JohnStuartMill »

Calculus Crusader wrote:I suspect this study features selection bias. It should also be noted that it was funded by homosexual advocacy groups, which is cause for close scrutiny.

The study was published in Pediatrics, an independent, peer-reviewed journal. Does that mitigate your suspicion at all?
"You clearly haven't read [Dawkins'] book." -Kevin Graham, 11/04/09
_Calculus Crusader
_Emeritus
Posts: 1495
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:52 am

Re: Newly Published Study on Same-Sex Parenting

Post by _Calculus Crusader »

JohnStuartMill wrote:You're absolutely right, Bob. We should definitely disregard the results of a peer-reviewed study published through an elite research university for the sole reason that they contradict conclusions drawn by a conservative think tank from inferior evidence. Good call there.


Statistics, including survey sampling, among non-statisticians is frequently deficient, even at "elite" universities.
Caeli enarrant gloriam Dei

(I lost access to my Milesius account, so I had to retrieve this one from the mothballs.)
_Calculus Crusader
_Emeritus
Posts: 1495
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:52 am

Re: Newly Published Study on Same-Sex Parenting

Post by _Calculus Crusader »

JohnStuartMill wrote:
Calculus Crusader wrote:I suspect this study features selection bias. It should also be noted that it was funded by homosexual advocacy groups, which is cause for close scrutiny.

The study was published in Pediatrics, an independent, peer-reviewed journal. Does that mitigate your suspicion at all?


Hell no.
Caeli enarrant gloriam Dei

(I lost access to my Milesius account, so I had to retrieve this one from the mothballs.)
_JohnStuartMill
_Emeritus
Posts: 1630
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 12:12 pm

Re: Newly Published Study on Same-Sex Parenting

Post by _JohnStuartMill »

Calculus Crusader wrote:
JohnStuartMill wrote:You're absolutely right, Bob. We should definitely disregard the results of a peer-reviewed study published through an elite research university for the sole reason that they contradict conclusions drawn by a conservative think tank from inferior evidence. Good call there.


Statistics, including survey sampling, among non-statisticians is frequently deficient, even at "elite" universities.

True. But it's almost always better at those elite universities than at ideological think tanks.

More importantly, though, the evidence offered by the Witherspoon Institute against gay parenting is inferior to the evidence offered by UCSF and Pediatrics that it can be beneficial. The latter conducted a longitudinal study of actual gay parents and their children, while the former leapt to conclusions based on oblique evidence from the weakly analogous cases of step- and single-parentage.
"You clearly haven't read [Dawkins'] book." -Kevin Graham, 11/04/09
Post Reply