cinepro wrote:I can't think of any other era or place in history I would rather live. And that's as a middle-class white male.
Having lived through the late 1950s and having vivid memories of the 1960s, and contrary to the suggestion that "the old days only seem better", I really do believe that in many ways they
were better. When I was a "kid", we went out to "play", to play cricket, soccer, or have cycle or running races. Today "kids" are stuck behind computers or glued to a TV set. We didn't have TV, and the computer age was 30 years away, so we made in real life friends, and we stayed up at night talking to each other, or listening to radio, not visiting video stores to get the latest "war games". And before the advent of TV we gathered around at night talking, not with everyone in the family with faces silently glued to a TV screen.
This is not to denigrate the enormous benefits the Internet and the "modern age" have given us. Without this medium, I could not express to you what I am now, but with these enormous benefits, which I acknowledge, there have also been some significant losses.
cinepro wrote:If I had to choose another era in which to live and I had to be a woman, non-white, and/or poor, all bets are off.
Have women attained equal status? Have non-whites attained equal status? Are the poor well looked after in 2010? You see this "age" as some kind of Paradise of Equality and Fairness?
We still struggle to rectify those wrongs, and I agree with that struggle. So there have been benefits, and losses, and my feeling is that the "modern generation" have too little appreciation of what it's like to have to boil water to get a hot bath, or to sell newspapers in the street at 5am in the morning to supplement your allowance.
With all of the "instant gratification" that the "push-button society" provides, it's no surprise to me that some "kids" these days think that vandalism and wanton destruction is a way of "expressing themselves".