Roger wrote:Because they have so radically altered the attributes of the orthodox God and Jesus Christ that they are no longer the original. We can debate which version of God is the right version, the Orthodox 1.0 or the LDS 1.8 but they are radically different. Even Hinckley recognized that.
All the best.
Well, I see your point but I still feel that if a person believes in the divinity of Jesus Christ then you could logically lump them with Christians.
Maybe if I could understand what the 3 biggest factors making a person Christian are. What are those?
1. He is the son of god
2. savior of humanity (from sin)
3. ....
There might be some huge differences in how Mormons and others believe in #1 and #2 but if those are the two most important ideas, and they have them, why not put them in the same category?
But I see your point. If Mormons have altered the ideas behind the nature of god so much that it is radically different than all other Christian sects then I could see how you think they don't belong.
The problem is, Mormons believe they have the correct core beliefs and all other Christians have the "radically changed" version. We are going to end up in a contradiction match rather than an argument here because how can you say one is right and the other wrong?
Maybe you could define a Christian as the person that is most like the rest of those with the label Christian.... I don't know.
That would work well as a compromise, Fringe Christians or marginal Christians, or some such word.