An odd alliance

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Simon Belmont

Re: An odd alliance

Post by _Simon Belmont »

liz3564 wrote:
Why the double-standard? There are plenty of pictures of the Savior in the temple.



And in Church houses across the world. Just not in chapels. Why is that a big deal? It has nothing to do with Jesus Christ, it has to do with pictures of any type.
_Yoda

Re: An odd alliance

Post by _Yoda »

Simon Belmont wrote:
liz3564 wrote:
Why the double-standard? There are plenty of pictures of the Savior in the temple.



And in Church houses across the world. Just not in chapels. Why is that a big deal? It has nothing to do with Jesus Christ, it has to do with pictures of any type.


I am just honestly curious as to why that mandate was made. Do you know? I really don't.
_Hoops
_Emeritus
Posts: 2863
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:11 am

Re: An odd alliance

Post by _Hoops »

harmony wrote:
So, the verdict is in: yes, Baptists and Mormons can work together for the greater good without killing each other, can allow each other the pathway to preach to each other's congregations, and do so without bloodshed or hard feelings.

And they say there's no God in heaven!


Obviously I don't know your community, but I have never heard that this was in doubt. Interesting history, I'm sure.

So it worked for a funeral, would it work for church basketball?
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: An odd alliance

Post by _harmony »

Simon Belmont wrote:
liz3564 wrote:
Why the double-standard? There are plenty of pictures of the Savior in the temple.



And in Church houses across the world. Just not in chapels. Why is that a big deal? It has nothing to do with Jesus Christ, it has to do with pictures of any type.


There's one of Christ in mine. ;-)
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_bcspace
_Emeritus
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm

Re: An odd alliance

Post by _bcspace »

So, the verdict is in: yes, Baptists and Mormons can work together for the greater good without killing each other, can allow each other the pathway to preach to each other's congregations, and do so without bloodshed or hard feelings.

And they say there's no God in heaven!


Always been the case. But one would be mistaken to assume any real ecumenism would ever occur. Doctrinal compromise is contrary to the gospel.
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
_Joey
_Emeritus
Posts: 717
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 1:34 am

Re: An odd alliance

Post by _Joey »

bcspace wrote: Doctrinal compromise is contrary to the gospel.


Except within the Mormon church!! Polygamy for statehood. Proxy baptisms of Jews for better PR! The list goes on!!!
"It's not so much that FARMS scholarship in the area Book of Mormon historicity is "rejected' by the secular academic community as it is they are "ignored". [Daniel Peterson, May, 2004]
_Hoops
_Emeritus
Posts: 2863
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:11 am

Re: An odd alliance

Post by _Hoops »


Doctrinal compromise is contrary to the gospel.


Fer sher!!
_Simon Belmont

Re: An odd alliance

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Joey wrote:Except within the Mormon church!! Polygamy for statehood. Proxy baptisms of Jews for better PR! The list goes on!!!


Get a life, Joey. Not only is this comment off topic, it is incredibly stupid, like most of your comments !!!!!!!!!111111one
Post Reply