Wisconsin: Curbs on unions show huge immediate benefits

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
Post Reply
_bcspace
_Emeritus
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm

Wisconsin: Curbs on unions show huge immediate benefits

Post by _bcspace »

Union curbs rescue a Wisconsin school district

"This is a disaster," said Mark Miller, the Wisconsin Senate Democratic leader, in February after Republican Gov. Scott Walker proposed a budget bill that would curtail the collective bargaining powers of some public employees. Miller predicted catastrophe if the bill were to become law -- a charge repeated thousands of times by his fellow Democrats, union officials, and protesters in the streets.

Now the bill is law, and we have some very early evidence of how it is working. And for one beleaguered Wisconsin school district, it's a godsend, not a disaster.

The Kaukauna School District, in the Fox River Valley of Wisconsin near Appleton, has about 4,200 students and about 400 employees. It has struggled in recent times and this year faced a deficit of $400,000. But after the law went into effect, at 12:01 a.m. Wednesday, school officials put in place new policies they estimate will turn that $400,000 deficit into a $1.5 million surplus. And it's all because of the very provisions that union leaders predicted would be disastrous.

In the past, teachers and other staff at Kaukauna were required to pay 10 percent of the cost of their health insurance coverage and none of their pension costs. Now, they'll pay 12.6 percent of the cost of their coverage (still well below rates in much of the private sector) and also contribute 5.8 percent of salary to their pensions. The changes will save the school board an estimated $1.2 million this year, according to board President Todd Arnoldussen.

Of course, Wisconsin unions had offered to make benefit concessions during the budget fight. Wouldn't Kaukauna's money problems have been solved if Walker had just accepted those concessions and not demanded cutbacks in collective bargaining powers?

"The monetary part of it is not the entire issue," says Arnoldussen, a political independent who won a spot on the board in a nonpartisan election. Indeed, some of the most important improvements in Kaukauna's outlook are because of the new limits on collective bargaining.

In the past, Kaukauna's agreement with the teachers union required the school district to purchase health insurance coverage from something called WEA Trust -- a company created by the Wisconsin teachers union. "It was in the collective bargaining agreement that we could only negotiate with them," says Arnoldussen. "Well, you know what happens when you can only negotiate with one vendor." This year, WEA Trust told Kaukauna that it would face a significant increase in premiums.

Now, the collective bargaining agreement is gone, and the school district is free to shop around for coverage. And all of a sudden, WEA Trust has changed its position. "With these changes, the schools could go out for bids, and lo and behold, WEA Trust said, 'We can match the lowest bid,'" says Republican state Rep. Jim Steineke, who represents the area and supports the Walker changes. At least for the moment, Kaukauna is staying with WEA Trust, but saving substantial amounts of money.

Then there are work rules. "In the collective bargaining agreement, high school teachers only had to teach five periods a day, out of seven," says Arnoldussen. "Now, they're going to teach six." In addition, the collective bargaining agreement specified that teachers had to be in the school 37 1/2 hours a week. Now, it will be 40 hours.

The changes mean Kaukauna can reduce the size of its classes -- from 31 students to 26 students in high school and from 26 students to 23 students in elementary school. In addition, there will be more teacher time for one-on-one sessions with troubled students. Those changes would not have been possible without the much-maligned changes in collective bargaining.

Teachers' salaries will stay "relatively the same," Arnoldussen says, except for higher pension and health care payments. (The top salary is around $80,000 per year, with about $35,000 in additional benefits, for 184 days of work per year -- summers off.) Finally, the money saved will be used to hire a few more teachers and institute merit pay.

It is impossible to overstate how bitter and ugly the Wisconsin fight has been, and that bitterness and ugliness continues to this day with efforts to recall senators and an unseemly battle inside the state Supreme Court. But the new law is now a reality, and Gov. Walker recently told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that the measure will gain acceptance "with every day, week and month that goes by that the world doesn't fall apart."

In the Kaukauna schools, the world is not only not falling apart -- it's getting better.


Of course, besides the huge drag unions are on the economy, there is also a lesson here against Socialism; specifically universal coverage. It is always cheaper (assuming you want to provide quality and quantity) to not have a single payer or a single buyer.
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
_MCB
_Emeritus
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:14 pm

Re: Wisconsin: Curbs on unions show huge immediate benefits

Post by _MCB »

Another advantage-- the tenure system will be weaker, enabling multicultural school systems to weed out those teachers who are prejudiced. This will strengthen compliance with NCLB. However, the demographics of the state are really quite segregated, which will allow those prejudiced teachers to find their niche-- where they will do less harm.

There are about twenty openings in my area of licensure, which means that the state is heading for a major problem. However, it will enable people who burned out before NCLB to return to working in education. The problems that burned them out are being resolved.
Huckelberry said:
I see the order and harmony to be the very image of God which smiles upon us each morning as we awake.

http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/a ... cc_toc.htm
_Quasimodo
_Emeritus
Posts: 11784
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:11 am

Re: Wisconsin: Curbs on unions show huge immediate benefits

Post by _Quasimodo »

Just a word in favor of unions. MCB, you're an historian. Think back to the nineteenth century, before there were unions in this country. Twelve hour work days at starvation wages, (Slavery might have been a better option). Child labor was common (there are graveyards full of child factory workers on the East coast). There was no middle class (maybe a few farmers). Only the very rich and the poor.

The establishment of unions change all of that. It created a middle class and provided a living wage and medical insurance for workers in the US. It also allowed the US economy (because of the new middle class) to rise above the level of a third world country. The fact that there were unions raised the bar for everyone else. Most of us would still be working for minimum wage if not for unions.

I've never been a union member and I've been self employed for many years, so I have no personal reason to support them. I think it's good, though, to give them their due.
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.

"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
_MCB
_Emeritus
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:14 pm

Re: Wisconsin: Curbs on unions show huge immediate benefits

Post by _MCB »

I agree totally. Unions have their place. However, in some cases, they get too much power. There has to be balance. Hopefully, just as in NCLB, there will be corrections, which will restore an appropriate balance.
Huckelberry said:
I see the order and harmony to be the very image of God which smiles upon us each morning as we awake.

http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/a ... cc_toc.htm
_Morley
_Emeritus
Posts: 3542
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:19 pm

Re: Wisconsin: Curbs on unions show huge immediate benefits

Post by _Morley »

Quasimodo wrote:Just a word in favor of unions. MCB, you're a historian. Think back to the nineteenth century, before there were unions in this country. Twelve hour work days at starvation wages, (Slavery might have been a better option). Child labor was common (there are graveyards full of child factory workers on the East coast). There was no middle class (maybe a few farmers). Only the very rich and the poor.

The establishment of unions change all of that. It created a middle class and provided a living wage and medical insurance for workers in the US. It also allowed the US economy (because of the new middle class) to rise above the level of a third world country. The fact that there were unions raised the bar for everyone else. Most of us would still be working for minimum wage if not for unions.

I've never been a union member and I've been self employed for many years, so I have no personal reason to support them. I think it's good, though, to give them their due.

Emphasis mine.

Good post and I mostly agree. But please don't minimize slavery, Quasi, my friend.
_bcspace
_Emeritus
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm

Re: Wisconsin: Curbs on unions show huge immediate benefits

Post by _bcspace »

The establishment of unions change all of that. It created a middle class and provided a living wage and medical insurance for workers in the US. It also allowed the US economy (because of the new middle class) to rise above the level of a third world country. The fact that there were unions raised the bar for everyone else. Most of us would still be working for minimum wage if not for unions.


I think you're WAY overstating the effect of unions, epecially in the area of the economy and "living wages". It is more accurate to state that unions are an effect of the free market when things get out of hand in a particular industry. And when unions survive beyond need, it is because of antimarket forces.

A union that survives is typically no different than an out of control corporation and we have things like collusion with tyrannical governments (yes, governments in the US are often tyrannical, espeically when they're liberal) in the form of collective bargaining or periodic strikes to assert control (auto industry). A market needs to be able to react to supply and demand to be equitible and surviving unions are essentially an imposition of price controls.
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
_Brackite
_Emeritus
Posts: 6382
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:12 am

Re: Wisconsin: Curbs on unions show huge immediate benefits

Post by _Brackite »

Good to hear out of the State of Wisconsin.
Republican Governor Scott Walker of Wisconsin is a lot better Governor than Democratic Governor Jerry Brown of California.
Democratic Governor Jerry Brown of California gave a ‘Sweetheart Deal' to the Prison guards' union that helped him get elected there. (1) This was about one month after Democratic Governor Jerry Brown of California approved cuts to the poor, the disable and the elderly. (2) Democratic Governor Jerry Brown is Not serious about Pension reform within the State of California. (3) As a result, California is heading towards a Pension tsunami. (4)
The State of Wisconsin is in a lot better shape than the liberal State of California is in.




1. http://www.calwatchdog.com/2011/04/21/g ... taxpayers/

http://articles.ocregister.com/2011-04- ... cash-value

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/apr/25 ... s-20110425


2. http://articles.latimes.com/2011/mar/25 ... t-20110325

http://californiabudgetbites.org/2011/0 ... abilities/


3. http://cagovernornews.com/www__Dcontrac ... w-us-p.php

http://cssrc.us/web/31/news.aspx?id=105 ... eSupport=1


4. http://www.pensiontsunami.com/

http://www.pensiontsunami.com/public.php

http://www.moneyshow.com/investing/blog ... Blog-16035
"And I've said it before, you want to know what Joseph Smith looked like in Nauvoo, just look at Trump." - Fence Sitter
Post Reply