Franktalk wrote: I do not trust the projections back in time that come from science. To me they have always been littered with assumptions that for me were impossible to accept.
Science is able to read the writing found within the registers of Facsimile No. 3. Are you aware of that?
Hey Paul,
Not every single question of significance in the universe is reducible to your disillusion with Joseph Smith's chicanery.
Not every single question of significance in the universe is reducible to your disillusion with Joseph Smith's chicanery.
Are you aware of that?
No, I'm not aware of that. Really, I'm not. It must have something to do with Joe Smith's greasy fingers or your interpretation of greasy fingers, I assume.
Not every single question of significance in the universe is reducible to your disillusion with Joseph Smith's chicanery.
Are you aware of that?
No, I'm not aware of that. Really, I'm not. It must have something to do with Joe Smith's greasy fingers or your interpretation of greasy fingers, I assume.
Paul O
I don't have any idea what that is supposed to mean, Paul. I trust it seemed meaningful to you as you typed it, but it sounds like so much blather to me.
I don't have any idea what that is supposed to mean, Paul. I trust it seemed meaningful to you as you typed it, but it sounds like so much blather to me.
Then leave it at that. Either you are beneath me or it is the reverse. I trust, however, I've the highter hand. Sorry, pal.
I don't have any idea what that is supposed to mean, Paul. I trust it seemed meaningful to you as you typed it, but it sounds like so much blather to me.
Then leave it at that. Either you are beneath me or it is the reverse. I trust, however, I've the highter hand. Sorry, pal.
Paul O
Leave it at what, Paul? Let's assume you have the "highter hand." Again, I have no idea what that is supposed to mean. Are you misspelling your words? What would be your "higher hand," assuming that that is what you meant, in this regard?
Leave it at what, Paul? Let's assume you have the "highter hand." Again, I have no idea what that is supposed to mean. Are you misspelling your words? What would be your "higher hand," assuming that that is what you meant, in this regard?
You assume right -- my hand is higher -- and you simply can't go there. It's no big deal. Just deal with it. I've placed you in a neat little compartment box with the rest of my spoils. You're like talking to an animal. Oh God.
Leave it at what, Paul? Let's assume you have the "highter hand." Again, I have no idea what that is supposed to mean. Are you misspelling your words? What would be your "higher hand," assuming that that is what you meant, in this regard?
You assume right -- my hand is higher -- and you simply can't go there. It's no big deal. Just deal with it. I've placed you in a neat little compartment box with the rest of my spoils. You're like talking to an animal. Oh God.
Thanks.
Paul O
Paul,
You're babbling. I'm sure it feels very meaningful to you.