Is "static" Simon Belmont?

[_Kishkumen]

I have brought the posts below from different threads. You be the judge. In my opinion, we all have verbal ticks that can serve as "tells" for discerning readers.

[_Kishkumen]

Here, let it all out

http://www.livejournal.com/

Hey, Simon, this would not be the first time you used such language on me, would it?

Not true at all. I wouldn't hurt a fly. But I understand why you're lashing out at me. Let it all out, Kishkumen.

Or others:

Let it all out, Deej. I know you were the "poster of the year" last year, but you can't be a rock star all the time.

Or someone else you love:

Let's let it all out, Scratch, and if you can do it without picking on unrelated people you find on Facebook I will continue to talk to you.

And:

Go ahead, though, you seem to be very angry at me (I have no clue why). It would probably be helpful for you to just let it all out -- just unload.

And:

Lash out... let it all out. Release your anger.

[_Kishkumen]

Try it sometime.

In the words of Simon Belmont:

Because I admitted to not knowing much about a particular subject? No, Scratch, that is not me getting "owned," that is me being an adult. You should try it sometime.

Or:

Please see above, where I said I did not know much about it. That, Kevin, is the honorable thing to do. You should try it -- it would work for just about any LDS subject you think you are the authority on.

And

I make choices, and I live with the consequences. That's called being an adult. You should try it.

And:

Hey Kishkumen, have you heard of the Atlantic Knot? Try it, it's a fun knot wear around.

Then again could this be our old friend The Nehor? Is it possible that both static and Simon Belmont are merely Nehor sock puppets?

Look at this:

The advantage of not being dishonest is that you don't have that problem. You should try it some time.

And this:

When I pray. Try it sometime.

A little less damning:

When in Rome.......

I've had it hurled at me so many time I thought I'd try it out.

Maybe a little closer:

Follow the Savior's advice, "Come and See." Then try it. Live some of it and judge the results.

Huh. I dunno! Interesting.

[_static]

Good detective work, Sherlock. Everyone who uses the same string of two or three words is the same person.

As it turns out I am also Mick Jagger

You can't always get what you want / but if you try sometime / you just might find / you get what you need

But I understand the tactic here. You can't debate me on the issues, so you use these evasive maneuvers. It's okay. I still love ya.

[_Equality]

Good detective work, Sherlock. Everyone who uses the same string of two or three words is the same person.

As it turns out I am also Mick Jagger

You can't always get what you want / but if you try sometime / you just might find / you get what you need

But I understand the tactic here. You can't debate me on the issues, so you use these evasive maneuvers. It's okay. I still love ya.

Hey, dumbass: "Try it" and "try sometime" are not the same. See, one has "it" in it and the other doesn't. But someone like you who loves the Mormon Church probably doesn't see the difference.

[_Kishkumen]

But I understand the tactic here. You can't debate me on the issues, so you use these evasive maneuvers. It's okay. I still love ya.

LOL, Simon. I know you think you have good intentions. It's just a shame that you are so lame at this.

You do, however, have the requisite lack of moral fiber and devotion of a "true believer" in the Hofferian sense.

[_sock puppet]

Good detective work, Sherlock. Everyone who uses the same string of two or three words is the same person.

As it turns out I am also Mick Jagger

You can't always get what you want / but if you try sometime / you just might find / you get what you need

But I understand the tactic here. You can't debate me on the issues, so you use these evasive maneuvers. It's okay. I still love ya.

No, sir. You are not Mick Jagger, wish though you might. Keep in mind, he's bagging every night a Roy High girl, raised in a good Mormon home. Are you?

[Guest]

Good detective work, Sherlock. Everyone who uses the same string of two or three words is the same person.

As it turns out I am also Mick Jagger

You can't always get what you want / but if you try sometime / you just might find / you get what you need

But I understand the tactic here. You can't debate me on the issues, so you use these evasive maneuvers. It's okay. I still love ya.

There is certainly something very familiar about the above. See the third post from the bottom here: http://www.mormondiscussions.com/phpBB3 ... &start=462 (you can't search Simon Belmont's posts anymore, so I can't link directly to it)

And static/whatever-that-last-one-was/Radex/Nibley's Ghost/Simon Belmont/Oxygenadam, there is no "tactic" by Kishkumen or anyone else. There is no substance from which to divert.

[Guest]

-

[_Spurven Ten Sing]

A mod may or may not have indicated to me that via IP, that the two are as one as the Trinity.