Will the Mormon Corporation Join the Fight? (link)

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_The Mighty Builder
_Emeritus
Posts: 1593
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 9:48 pm

Will the Mormon Corporation Join the Fight? (link)

Post by _The Mighty Builder »

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06 ... ht-on?lite

". . . . opponents vowed to keep up their campaign in a pitched state-by-state battle."

"But opponents said the decision in DOMA upheld another key part of that federal law known as Section 2.

“Which means that the states still get to define marriage for themselves and don't have to recognize marriages performed in other states and I think that part of the holding -- the deference to the states definition of marriage – actually calls into question the Proposition 8 ruling” at the district court level in which it was struck down, said John Eastman, chairman of the National Organization for Marriage, which has spent tens of millions of dollars to bring votes in dozens of states blocking same-sex
“We clearly have a mixed ruling here. Justice Kennedy did not say that all states must recognize same-sex marriage. In fact, his opinion is full of deference to the states determination of marriage policy.""
_Baker
_Emeritus
Posts: 490
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:01 am

Re: Will the Mormon Corporation Join the Fight? (link)

Post by _Baker »

Equal protection issue - and an invitation to challenge states' determinations of the definition of marriage on those grounds. In other words, states remain free to define marriage, but subject to challenge that their definitions are constitutional.
"I have more to boast of than ever any man had. I am the only man that has ever been able to keep a whole church together since the days of Adam. ... Neither Paul, John, Peter, nor Jesus ever did it. I boast that no man ever did such a work as I." - Joseph Smith, 1844
_Equality
_Emeritus
Posts: 3362
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:44 pm

Re: Will the Mormon Corporation Join the Fight? (link)

Post by _Equality »

The Mighty Builder wrote:"But opponents said the decision in DOMA upheld another key part of that federal law known as Section 2.

Said opponents are either ignorant or dissembling. The Windsor opinion today did not "uphold" Section 2. Windsor addressed only the constitutionality of Section 3 of DOMA. The Supreme Court does not decide issues not before it. Challenges to Section 2 of DOMA are working their way through the courts and I think it is likely that one of those cases will find its way to the Supreme Court in the next few years, at which time the Supreme Court will have a chance to uphold it or strike it down. Section 2 of DOMA stands as good law for now, but it is not correct to say that the Windsor case upheld it--it simply did not address the question.
"The Church is authoritarian, tribal, provincial, and founded on a loosely biblical racist frontier sex cult."--Juggler Vain
"The lds church is the Amway of religions. Even with all the soap they sell, they still manage to come away smelling dirty."--Some Schmo
Post Reply