Archaeologists have found what they believe to be the world’s oldest intact shipwreck at the bottom of the Black Sea where it appears to have lain undisturbed for more than 2,400 years.
The 23-metre (75ft) vessel, thought to be ancient Greek, was discovered with its mast, rudders and rowing benches all present and correct just over a mile below the surface. A lack of oxygen at that depth preserved it, the researchers said.
“A ship surviving intact from the classical world, lying in over 2km of water, is something I would never have believed possible,” said Professor Jon Adams, the principal investigator with the Black Sea Maritime Archaeology Project (MAP), the team that made the find. “This will change our understanding of shipbuilding and seafaring in the ancient world.”
The ship is believed to have been a trading vessel of a type that researchers say has only previously been seen “on the side of ancient Greek pottery such as the ‘Siren Vase’ in the British Museum”.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/201 ... -black-sea
Looking forward to the next astonishing ancient Nephite find
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2016 4:02 pm
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1165
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:07 am
Re: Looking forward to the next astonishing ancient Nephite
Very hard to find a mythical civilization and there artifacts 

Justice = Getting what you deserve
Mercy = Not getting what you deserve
Grace = Getting what you can never deserve
Mercy = Not getting what you deserve
Grace = Getting what you can never deserve
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 8261
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 1:40 am
Re: Looking forward to the next astonishing ancient Nephite
Even harder to use correct grammar.
"Their artifacts"
"Their artifacts"
It is better to be a warrior in a garden, than a gardener at war.
Some of us, on the other hand, actually prefer a religion that includes some type of correlation with reality.
~Bill Hamblin
Some of us, on the other hand, actually prefer a religion that includes some type of correlation with reality.
~Bill Hamblin
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:07 pm
Re: Looking forward to the next astonishing ancient Nephite
SteelHead wrote:Even harder to use correct grammar.
"Their artifacts"
Did that correction make you feel good? I would assume you’re better than all that. Seems rather petty
Proud to be the first of the "February Four" expelled from the Ceebooist branch of NeverMormonism.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:07 pm
Re: Looking forward to the next astonishing ancient Nephite
Incidentally, I’m surprised this thread was moved.
Proud to be the first of the "February Four" expelled from the Ceebooist branch of NeverMormonism.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2016 4:02 pm
Re: Looking forward to the next astonishing ancient Nephite
I was surprised too. But I’m mostly a lurker here. Still, I would think that an archeological find from 2400 BCE would be worth discussing by those interested in proof of the historicity of the Book of Mormon. After all, this could just as easily have been a slightly off-course vessel trying to deliver supplies of cattle, wheat and horses to the Nephites!
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 15602
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm
Re: Looking forward to the next astonishing ancient Nephite
Chuck Finley wrote:SteelHead wrote:Even harder to use correct grammar.
"Their artifacts"
Did that correction make you feel good? I would assume you’re better than all that. Seems rather petty
It's petty to want people to use proper English? Just how low are your standards?
When you correct someone's English, you're doing them a favor. You're helping them to avoid appearing uneducated in the future, making them more likely to be taken seriously.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 14117
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm
Re: Looking forward to the next astonishing ancient Nephite
Flexible wrote:I was surprised too. But I’m mostly a lurker here. Still, I would think that an archeological find from 2400 BCE would be worth discussing by those interested in proof of the historicity of the Book of Mormon. After all, this could just as easily have been a slightly off-course vessel trying to deliver supplies of cattle, wheat and horses to the Nephites!
No, it couldn't have been.
The criteria for a thread being considered off-topic is based on what's at the other end of the link, not necessarily whether the word "Nephite" or "Mormon" appears in the commentary about it here. If the link is about Mormonism, then it's on-topic. If the link is not about Mormonism, then it's off-topic.
For example, if I posted a link to a story about the sustainability of nuclear power until the end of the 21st Century, it doesn't magically get to stay in the Terrestrial Forum just because I said, "What would the Nephites think about this?"
See how that works?
Chuck Finley wrote:SteelHead wrote:Even harder to use correct grammar.
"Their artifacts"
Did that correction make you feel good? I would assume you’re better than all that. Seems rather petty
Well, it made me feel good. . .
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
--Louis Midgley
--Louis Midgley