It's not doctrine unless all 15 of us teach it. Oaks.

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_huckelberry
_Emeritus
Posts: 4559
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 2:29 am

Re: It's not doctrine unless all 15 of us teach it. Oaks.

Post by _huckelberry »

mentalgymnast wrote:
DoubtingThomas wrote:
...and he eliminated apologetics too. He said, "Excessive reliance on personal teachings or speculations may even draw us aside from concentrating on learning and efforts that will further our understanding and help us go forward on the covenant path."

...stop recommending things that are not approved by the church.


If you had actually listened to this podcast you wouldn't have said this.

Regards,
MG


My computer sound system died so I am not going to hear a pod cast. It makes me consider that if the matter was clear it probably could be presented in written sentences.
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: It's not doctrine unless all 15 of us teach it. Oaks.

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

So, is conversion therapy doctrinal or simply the teachings of man?

- Doc
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.

Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
_Philo Sofee
_Emeritus
Posts: 6660
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:04 am

Re: It's not doctrine unless all 15 of us teach it. Oaks.

Post by _Philo Sofee »

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:So, is conversion therapy doctrinal or simply the teachings of man?

- Doc

They will probably resort to saying something else stupid like oh science confirms Mormonism, therefore it only takes one of us on that one. :rolleyes:
Dr CamNC4Me
"Dr. Peterson and his Callithumpian cabal of BYU idiots have been marginalized by their own inevitable irrelevancy defending a fraud."
_mentalgymnast
_Emeritus
Posts: 8574
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 9:39 pm

Re: It's not doctrine unless all 15 of us teach it. Oaks.

Post by _mentalgymnast »

huckelberry wrote:My computer sound system died so I am not going to hear a pod cast. It makes me consider that if the matter was clear it probably could be presented in written sentences.

Here is the transcript.

http://hwcdn.libsyn.com/p/e/a/7/ea7517b ... c1510fad84

Regards,
MG
_mentalgymnast
_Emeritus
Posts: 8574
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 9:39 pm

Re: It's not doctrine unless all 15 of us teach it. Oaks.

Post by _mentalgymnast »

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:So, is conversion therapy doctrinal or simply the teachings of man?

- Doc

What do you think?

Regards,
MG
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: It's not doctrine unless all 15 of us teach it. Oaks.

Post by _moksha »

How would this affect the unwritten doctrines (the tithing must flow) and policies (oppose LGBTQ rights whenever you can get away with it) that have been claimed by some of the Brethren?
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_mentalgymnast
_Emeritus
Posts: 8574
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 9:39 pm

Re: It's not doctrine unless all 15 of us teach it. Oaks.

Post by _mentalgymnast »

moksha wrote:How would this affect the unwritten doctrines (the tithing must flow) and policies (oppose LGBTQ rights whenever you can get away with it) that have been claimed by some of the Brethren?

Tithing is considered to be a 'law unto the church'. It's not a salvific doctrine. LGBTQ policies are just that. Policies. At the foundation of those policies, however, are some settled salvific doctrines involving family relationships in the eternities.

Regards,
MG
_Dr Moore
_Emeritus
Posts: 849
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2019 5:19 am

Re: It's not doctrine unless all 15 of us teach it. Oaks.

Post by _Dr Moore »

mentalgymnast wrote:Tithing is considered to be a 'law unto the church'. It's not a salvific doctrine.

I am very confused by this statement. Which of the 15 apostles disagrees that Tithing is a requirement to receive saving ordinances? Which of them would disagree that Tithing is doctrinal teaching and requirement to qualify for the blessings of eternal life?

mentalgymnast wrote:LGBTQ policies are just that. Policies. At the foundation of those policies, however, are some settled salvific doctrines involving family relationships in the eternities.

This statement is loaded with problems which unfortunately culminate in church leaders being unreliable sources of doctrine and policy.
_Lemmie
_Emeritus
Posts: 10590
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:25 pm

Re: It's not doctrine unless all 15 of us teach it. Oaks.

Post by _Lemmie »

Dr Moore wrote:
mentalgymnast wrote:Tithing is considered to be a 'law unto the church'. It's not a salvific doctrine.

I am very confused by this statement. Which of the 15 apostles disagrees that Tithing is a requirement to receive saving ordinances? Which of them would disagree that Tithing is doctrinal teaching and requirement to qualify for the blessings of eternal life?

mentalgymnast wrote:LGBTQ policies are just that. Policies. At the foundation of those policies, however, are some settled salvific doctrines involving family relationships in the eternities.

This statement is loaded with problems which unfortunately culminate in church leaders being unreliable sources of doctrine and policy.

I don’t get the tithing comment either. According to the article mg linked to earlier in this thread:
Doctrine is what the current prophets, seers, and revelators are teaching. They include eternal, essential truths necessary for our salvation...

On LDS.org, the nine basic doctrines of the Church are listed...

And in the nine basic doctrines , “pay a full tithe” is part of Doctrine #9.

Also, from the lds.org site, under Doctrine 7:
Some ordinances are essential to exaltation and are called saving ordinances....

Other saving ordinances include ordination to the Melchizedek Priesthood (for men), the temple endowment, and the marriage sealing (see D&C 131:1–4)....

So marriage sealing is “essential to exaltation.”

From Doctrine 8:

Marriage between a man and a woman is ordained of God....

The earth was created and the gospel was revealed so that families could be formed, sealed, and exalted eternally...


So if we can take this lds.org Doctrine page seriously, it’s pretty clear that lgbtq policies are not ‘just policies’.

Link to the lds.org Doctrines page:

https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/bc/ ... f?lang=eng
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: It's not doctrine unless all 15 of us teach it. Oaks.

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

MG is the Mormon equivalent of a flower girl tossing petals from her basket. Except the petals are bits of turds, and responsible adults are constantly having to pick up after him. I’ll tell you what the only consistent doctrines that have been in place since its inception are:

Pay
Pray
Obey

Everything else is up for negotiation.

- Doc
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.

Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
Post Reply