liz3564 wrote:Buffalo wrote:I think it's an open secret that Brother Kimball was gay
Where did that come from?
I believe it came from Buffalo.
liz3564 wrote:Buffalo wrote:I think it's an open secret that Brother Kimball was gay
Where did that come from?
liz3564 wrote:Buffalo wrote:I think it's an open secret that Brother Kimball was gay
Where did that come from?
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
This is what holds TBMs back from being great artists. There are truly great TBM artists, but they are constained by what is considered "appropriate" and they are taught to believe their talents must be used to build up the kingdom of god. When Cleanflix tried to chop up films to meet LDS standards, that is what an LDS artist instinctively does to their own art.
But then we ask, “Can there never be another Michelangelo?” Ah! Yes! His David in Florence and his Moses in Rome inspire us to the point of adulation. Did all such talent run out in that early century? Could not we find a living talent like this, but with a soul that was free from immorality and sensuality and intolerance?
moksha wrote:But then we ask, “Can there never be another Michelangelo?” Ah! Yes! His David in Florence and his Moses in Rome inspire us to the point of adulation. Did all such talent run out in that early century? Could not we find a living talent like this, but with a soul that was free from immorality and sensuality and intolerance?
The answer is no. Once we divorce the artist from the human condition, we are left with something that would be lauded at BYU, but never "another Michelangelo".
moksha wrote:But then we ask, “Can there never be another Michelangelo?” Ah! Yes! His David in Florence and his Moses in Rome inspire us to the point of adulation. Did all such talent run out in that early century? Could not we find a living talent like this, but with a soul that was free from immorality and sensuality and intolerance?
The answer is no. Once we divorce the artist from the human condition, we are left with something that would be lauded at BYU, but never "another Michelangelo".
Futile hope.SWK wrote:With regard to masters, surely there must be many of the quality of Wagners (Richard Wagner, 1813–83) in the Church, approaching him or yet to come in the future—young people with a love of art, talent supreme, and eagerness to create. I hope we may produce men greater than this German composer, Wagner, but less eccentric, more spiritual.
Perverts? Degenerates?SWK wrote:It has been said that many of the great artists were perverts or moral degenerates.
zeezrom wrote:Some of his female nudes look like men with breasts glued on:
picture with breasts
Shulem wrote:David is one mighty fine looking man.
picture with genitals
Paul O
ludwigm wrote:Benevolent warning!zeezrom wrote:Some of his female nudes look like men with breasts glued on:
picture with breastsShulem wrote:David is one mighty fine looking man.
picture with genitals
Paul O
I was punished with one week banning for similar things. Breast on a caricature and David's unpronounceables.
surely there must be many of the quality of Wagners
...
but less eccentric, more spiritual.
we ask, “Can there never be another Michelangelo?”
...
but with a soul that was free from immorality and sensuality and intolerance?