I did not recognize AI in MG's post. I thought it a mix of MG clunky and standard Mormon talk which could spill out rather easily for a person listening to Mormon talks on a regular basis. I am no expert on recognizing AI so I may well be just missing what others are seeing.
Fair point Huck. The coherence of your non-empirical dimensions are spot-on here. The narrative seems internally consistent and contextually robust.
You mean internally consistent with mg's other AI cut-and-paste posts? When mg switches from his words to AI, everything changes. Also, huck seems to change his mind fairly quickly...
I will admit that even to me, not eager to see AI. MG's post on history reads very much like pieces of AI stuck together. The phrase "your opinion is valued" is a give away. It is listing people with views closer to MG than Pseudopaul.
Last edited by Marcus on Tue Nov 11, 2025 10:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
mg wrote:
...The ways I've used this word are independent of any other application of the word...
It really doesn't enhance one's reputation to argue that one has used a word unlike how anyone else on the planet has ever used that word.
From Through the Looking Glass:
Lewis Carroll wrote:“When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’
’The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you can make words mean so many different things.’
’The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘which is to be master — that’s all.”
Marcus wrote:
MG wrote:
...All posts were in 2021,2022,2023
I've used the word "scaffolding" in conjunction with the word "template" which runs parallel to "framework"...
Mentalgymnast's been cheating by cut-and-pasting other sources without credit for that long??
You can help Ukraine by talking for an hour a week!! PM me, or check www.enginprogram.org for details. Слава Україні!, 𝑺𝒍𝒂𝒗𝒂 𝑼𝒌𝒓𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒊!
To be honest, I’ve never seen that word combination—scaffold-framework-template—used before. Needs its own portmanteau. I nominate scaframeplate. Although “frameplate” is actually something I think someone might genuinely use.
“And so we see that the covenant operates within a holy Frameplate; a revealed architecture of belief through which obedience is formed.”
Fair point Huck. The coherence of your non-empirical dimensions are spot-on here. The narrative seems internally consistent and contextually robust.
You mean internally consistent with mg's other AI cut-and-paste posts? When mg switches from his words to AI, everything changes. Also, huck seems to change his mind fairly quickly...
I will admit that even to me, not eager to see AI. MG's post on history reads very much like pieces of AI stuck together. The phrase "your opinion is valued" is a give away. It is listing people with views closer to MG than Pseudopaul.
My polar reactions were of course to different posts which gave me different impressions. I do not claim to know how much MG uses AI. His transitions between points intended to build an argument can be abrupt with relationship which can seem a bit awkward. I can see that as part of his signature style, just the way he thinks. It could be seen on the othrr hand as assembled AI pieces not originally united.
You mean internally consistent with mg's other AI cut-and-paste posts? When mg switches from his words to AI, everything changes. Also, huck seems to change his mind fairly quickly...
My polar reactions were of course to different posts which gave me different impressions. I do not claim to know how much MG uses AI. His transitions between points intended to build an argument can be abrupt with relationship which can seem a bit awkward. I can see that as part of his signature style, just the way he thinks. It could be seen on the othrr hand as assembled AI pieces not originally united.
Huck, I love that line “abrupt with relationship.” It almost feels self-referential—the sentence itself is abrupt with relationship to the next one. You might have invented a whole new rhetorical category there.
Good one.
