LDSToronto wrote:
So the answer is, "No, Derrick did not have Jersey Girl's in real life information".
See, that's real interesting. Jersey Girl is an anonymous figure on the interwebs (except for those that know her), Derrick doesn't have her in real life information, yet she claims she felt that her safety and her family's safety was threatened. Does Jersey Girl not trust her friends to keep that information sacred and secret?
Now, why should we give that threat any more credence than the threat Shades felt towards his livelihood when Jersey Girl allegedly threatened him with legal action?
hmmmmmm.....
H.
I don't get you LDST...what made you change your mind on this?
You were there on the board when this all happened; you even started a thread calling for Darrick's banning. You clearly understood he was a threat, he's threatened DCP, MCB and had turned his sights on JG-- You saw the posts Jersey Girl made to EA and how he brushed her off, threatening her with banning instead of doing something, ANYTHING to diffuse the situation and try to protect the posters. You did not turn against her until later.
I just went back and read the thread. It's amazing how unconcerned EA acted. He's also the one who misconstrued her comments, assuming she was going to sue, yet in her comments, she tries to get him to do his job as a moderator by reminding him that the board had a legal contractual agreement they needed to abide by.
This whole mess could have been so easily avoided, it's pathetic.