Apostacy big winner at oscars

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _EAllusion »

"Poor Gaz," your descendants will say, "he was limited by his time."

Let me say to your descendants that no you were not. Granted, your contemporary Mormon cultural milieu greatly influenced you, but your time gave you every opportunity to make the right choices. You just turned willfully turned your back on those opportunities to be a hateful bigot. You failed. You bear some responsibility in this. Let's not pawn this off on just your time.
_Jason Bourne
_Emeritus
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _Jason Bourne »

Unfortunately, altogether too many choose church leaders instead of the child. We don't do "loving and accepting" very well in the church. And those who choose their children are shunned. And those who love and accept their gay children, and who advocate for changes in policy within the church are just asking to be hauled into the bishop's office. Excommunication isn't off the table, for the parents or the gay child.


You think a parent that is supportive and loving towards a gay child will get church discipline?

I hardly think so.

How is this any different than me loving my inactive son who is not living the LDS rules for the law of chastity or for my daughter who moved in with a guy for six month before they got married. I loved and supported them still and was not called in for anything. And I was quite open about my love and support like most LDS parents I know are when children wander.
_SatanWasSetUp
_Emeritus
Posts: 1183
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:40 pm

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _SatanWasSetUp »

EAllusion wrote:"Poor Gaz," your descendants will say, "he was limited by his time."

Let me say to your descendants that no you were not. Granted, your contemporary Mormon cultural milieu greatly influenced you, but your time gave you every opportunity to make the right choices. You just turned willfully turned your back on those opportunities to be a hateful bigot. You failed. You bear some responsibility in this. Let's not pawn this off on just your time.


Fortunately future apologists do not need to defend Gaz's statements. The apologists here aren't even defending him.
"We of this Church do not rely on any man-made statement concerning the nature of Deity. Our knowledge comes directly from the personal experience of Joseph Smith." - Gordon B. Hinckley

"It's wrong to criticize leaders of the Mormon Church even if the criticism is true." - Dallin H. Oaks
_SatanWasSetUp
_Emeritus
Posts: 1183
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:40 pm

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _SatanWasSetUp »

Jason Bourne wrote:You think a parent that is supportive and loving towards a gay child will get church discipline?

I hardly think so.

How is this any different than me loving my inactive son who is not living the LDS rules for the law of chastity or for my daughter who moved in with a guy for six month before they got married. I loved and supported them still and was not called in for anything. And I was quite open about my love and support like most LDS parents I know are when children wander.


It's OK to love your child, as long as you continue to fast and pray for them, call them to repentence, and work with the bishop to get them back on the straight and narrow path. That is what LDS consider "loving" your child. I don't know any TBM parent of a "wayward" child who publicly says they love their child for who they are, and are proud of the choices they have made because they are so happy now. Holy crap, can you imagine someone saying that about their gay child?
"We of this Church do not rely on any man-made statement concerning the nature of Deity. Our knowledge comes directly from the personal experience of Joseph Smith." - Gordon B. Hinckley

"It's wrong to criticize leaders of the Mormon Church even if the criticism is true." - Dallin H. Oaks
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _Some Schmo »

SatanWasSetUp wrote: Fortunately future apologists do not need to defend Gaz's statements. The apologists here aren't even defending him.

Yeah, well, they've got enough moronic, indefensible stuff to try to make plausible without tackling the crap they don't have to.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_antishock8
_Emeritus
Posts: 2425
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:02 am

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _antishock8 »

This reminds me of the Islamic community when one of their own kills a minority. Not much of an outcry. Tacit acceptance. Crazy.

That being said:

Who murdered whom?

I find it disheartening that a murderer, the highest order of sin, is considered a hero. Isn't it wonderful? Isn't it marvelous?
You can’t trust adults to tell you the truth.

Scream the lie, whisper the retraction.- The Left
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _Chap »

SatanWasSetUp wrote:
Jason Bourne wrote:You think a parent that is supportive and loving towards a gay child will get church discipline?

I hardly think so.

How is this any different than me loving my inactive son who is not living the LDS rules for the law of chastity or for my daughter who moved in with a guy for six month before they got married. I loved and supported them still and was not called in for anything. And I was quite open about my love and support like most LDS parents I know are when children wander.


It's OK to love your child, as long as you continue to fast and pray for them, call them to repentence, and work with the bishop to get them back on the straight and narrow path. That is what LDS consider "loving" your child. I don't know any TBM parent of a "wayward" child who publicly says they love their child for who they are, and are proud of the choices they have made because they are so happy now. Holy crap, can you imagine someone saying that about their gay child?


Half a minute. Jason Bourne is an LDS.

Doesn't he get to say something about 'what LDS consider "loving" your child'? And I am not sure that I have to agree with my children's choices and celebrate them in order to qualify as 'loving and supporting' them, even if I am delighted if they have found a way to live happily.
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Gazelam:

If Jesus was alive today, who would he be hanging around with: You, or the people you despise?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Yoda

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _Yoda »

Harmony wrote:I haven't seen the movie, so can only comment on a general concept:

1. no one deserves to be killed because of their sexual orientation.

2. no one deserves to be marginalized, ostracized, shunned, deprived of family love and support, or be discriminated against due to their sexual orientation.

And Gaz knows he's not in compliance with the gospel. He's just ranting.



I couldn't have put this better myself. This is further evidence that Harmony and I were twins separated at birth. :lol:

Gaz......I would like to ask you a couple of questions.

Do you really think that all homosexuals are militantly attempting to "recruit" others to their lifestyle?

Do you actually know anyone who is homosexual?
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Hey Gaz---

By any chance have you actually seen the film? Mopologists very strongly condemn any commentary on works that one hasn't seen or read. If you are guilty of this, you will be setting back The Agenda a long ways indeed.
Post Reply