Hey Mormon guys and gals! - Nugget #1 from the CHI:

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

Are you suggesting it's bad that people in a Church where personal revelation is prized should seek revelation regarding such a big decision.


How in the world you got that out of what I said is beyond me.

You seem to insinuate that the church isn't really saying "talk to your bishop first" because it isn't actively going after people who don't. But it isn't actively going after people who don't pray about it first, either. Yet, clearly, you're supposed to pray about it first, and just as clearly, you're supposed to talk to your bishop first.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Post by _harmony »

beastie wrote:I had heard, at BYU, that one urban Mormon legend was that if you were sterilized in this life, your punishment would be to be resurrected as a sterilized being, but I always thought that was baloney.


Leave it to BYU to put words in God's mouth. Oh wait... Joseph was on the same path.
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Post by _The Nehor »

beastie wrote:
Are you suggesting it's bad that people in a Church where personal revelation is prized should seek revelation regarding such a big decision.


How in the world you got that out of what I said is beyond me.

You seem to insinuate that the church isn't really saying "talk to your bishop first" because it isn't actively going after people who don't. But it isn't actively going after people who don't pray about it first, either. Yet, clearly, you're supposed to pray about it first, and just as clearly, you're supposed to talk to your bishop first.


If the Church was directing people to talk to their Bishop about such a thing then you would be right. However, I have been an active member in the Church for 23 years and I have never heard counsel to consult with your Bishop over such things from the pulpit or in the classroom. The only reference we have is in a book that is supposed to be restricted to a few Priesthood leaders. How in the world can everyone be 'supposed' to talk to their Bishop if virtually no one knows they should?

I find it humorous that people are complaining that a restricted book is commanding members who have no access to the book to do something. It's preposterous. The Church knows how to get the word out if they want to. They must not be that concerned about it.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_Coggins7
_Emeritus
Posts: 3679
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:25 am

Post by _Coggins7 »

I grew up tuning into Dr D every Sunday night.




Ah yes, Dead Puppies. Oh for the good ol' days...
The face of sin today often wears the mask of tolerance.


- Thomas S. Monson
_Coggins7
_Emeritus
Posts: 3679
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:25 am

Post by _Coggins7 »

bcspace wrote:
Zero Population is the answer my friend. Without it, the rest of us are doomed!


I'd trust a broken leg before I'd trust a dame.



There is nothin' like a dame,
Nothin' in the world,
There is nothin' you can name
That is anythin' like a dame!


Cha, cha, cha...
The face of sin today often wears the mask of tolerance.


- Thomas S. Monson
Post Reply