BYU question for Peterson, Hamblin, or any other affiliates:

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Joey
_Emeritus
Posts: 717
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 1:34 am

BYU question for Peterson, Hamblin, or any other affiliates:

Post by _Joey »

For those who are paid by the same institution that has now put a hold one Chad Hardy's diploma, can any of you provide your thoughts as to WHY?

Does one's academic achievement depend on future obedience to a non-secular agenda? Does BYU now have an "academic worthiness" criteria? Is freedom of thought, speech or expression now a "look back" policy at your "supposedly" academic institution?

Or is this situation, like the polygamous affairs of SMith, now one of those issues that is best put in the "future chasm of time"?
"It's not so much that FARMS scholarship in the area Book of Mormon historicity is "rejected' by the secular academic community as it is they are "ignored". [Daniel Peterson, May, 2004]
_squawkeye
_Emeritus
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:12 pm

Re: BYU question for Peterson, Hamblin, or any other affiliates:

Post by _squawkeye »

Why? This is simple. It is about the MONEY. If Chad had paid tithing he could have done nudie calendars and it would have been OK. Marriott rents porno flicks and his money is just find with LDS, Inc.

Remember the Video Flick prosecution in Utah County? The Defense got the guy off by bringing in videos from Marriott Hotel in Provo, the very flicks they were prosecuting the guy for. He was found not guilty.

BYU has artwork in its permanent collection that shows nudity. Some on faculty in the visual arts sections do nude artwork. They all pay tithing.

As much as the powers that be at BYU and above try to deny it all they do is affirm it. It is about the MONEY.
_Joey
_Emeritus
Posts: 717
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 1:34 am

Re: BYU question for Peterson, Hamblin, or any other affiliates:

Post by _Joey »

So is it inappropriate to ask questions dealing with academic progression and achievement from BYU faculty members??
"It's not so much that FARMS scholarship in the area Book of Mormon historicity is "rejected' by the secular academic community as it is they are "ignored". [Daniel Peterson, May, 2004]
_antishock8
_Emeritus
Posts: 2425
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:02 am

Re: BYU question for Peterson, Hamblin, or any other affiliates:

Post by _antishock8 »

I would just like Mr. Quinn to drop his mask, and just start posting as himself. He's such a pussy. He really doesn't have THAT much lose. Really. After all, look at The Fat Man. Has he lost anything? No. He has not.

C'mon, Dr. Quinn. Drop the facade.
You can’t trust adults to tell you the truth.

Scream the lie, whisper the retraction.- The Left
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: BYU question for Peterson, Hamblin, or any other affiliates:

Post by _harmony »

antishock8 wrote:I would just like Mr. Quinn to drop his mask, and just start posting as himself. He's such a pussy. He really doesn't have THAT much lose. Really. After all, look at The Fat Man. Has he lost anything? No. He has not.

C'mon, Dr. Quinn. Drop the facade.


It's bad internet form to try to strip someone's mask.

Please don't make this type of comment. Many of here depend on our anonymity in order to participate.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_The Dude
_Emeritus
Posts: 2976
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:16 am

Re: BYU question for Peterson, Hamblin, or any other affiliates:

Post by _The Dude »

My guess is that Dr. Peterson, and probably Dr. Hamblin too, would not go back and change a student's grade after learning something about the student's personal life. Further, my guess is that Dr. Peterson, and probably Dr. Hamblin too, would view such a retroactive adjustment as unethical.
"And yet another little spot is smoothed out of the echo chamber wall..." Bond
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: BYU question for Peterson, Hamblin, or any other affiliates:

Post by _harmony »

The Dude wrote:My guess is that Dr. Peterson, and probably Dr. Hamblin too, would not go back and change a student's grade after learning something about the student's personal life. Further, my guess is that Dr. Peterson, and probably Dr. Hamblin too, would view such a retroactive adjustment as unethical.


And yet isn't that what the institution that employs(ed) them both did?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_The Dude
_Emeritus
Posts: 2976
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:16 am

Re: BYU question for Peterson, Hamblin, or any other affiliates:

Post by _The Dude »

harmony wrote:And yet isn't that what the institution that employs(ed) them both did?


Oh, that's different. If Dr. Peterson or Hamblin were called upon by an LDS authority figure to go back and change a grade in order to punish a student for unrelated personal behavior, I guess Peterson or Hamblin would comply without a hint of complaint. There's ethical/unethical, and then there's divine command. One is of man, and one is of God.
"And yet another little spot is smoothed out of the echo chamber wall..." Bond
_Ray A

Re: BYU question for Peterson, Hamblin, or any other affiliates:

Post by _Ray A »

antishock8 wrote:I would just like Mr. Quinn to drop his mask, and just start posting as himself. He's such a pussy. He really doesn't have THAT much lose. Really. After all, look at The Fat Man. Has he lost anything? No. He has not.

C'mon, Dr. Quinn. Drop the facade.


Quinn posts here? Okay, I dare not ask anymore.
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Re: BYU question for Peterson, Hamblin, or any other affiliates:

Post by _Gadianton »

Well, BYU has always been clear that the ecclesiastical endorsement and following the "hedge" they've put around the law is mandatory and that they will null and void a diploma. The consequence here is something BYU has always been open about. BYU feels that their answer to "liberal arts" includes the intangible obedience to the laws of an angry God, redacted and magnified by wicked, controlling priests. And the diploma they offer doesn't just represent academic achievement but purity of living.

Well, everyone who goes to BYU agrees to those terms, they aren't forced.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
Post Reply