Former Head of BYU Anthropology Department thinks Mesoamerican LG theory is "preposterous"

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
simon southerton
Sunbeam
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2020 11:15 pm

Former Head of BYU Anthropology Department thinks Mesoamerican LG theory is "preposterous"

Post by simon southerton »

G'day comrades,
Long time no post.

Thought some of you might get a chuckle out of this.

A few days ago I posted (see below) about recent archeological discoveries in Mesoamerica that have exposed anachronisms in the Limited Geography Theory espoused by John Sorenson and his sycophants (Peterson, Midgley, Givens, Bushman etc). As you all know these gentlemen have pinned most of there hopes on the pre-classic Maya.

Many of the latest discoveries were made possible by the use of LIDAR, which is particularly good at revealing the oldest man-made structures of the Maya. I made the claim that most Mormons believed the Nephites were the ancestors of the Maya since that is what Joseph Smith believed. Mormon apologists have been hooked on the Maya since Nibley.

I was very surprised when Charles Nuckolls, the former head of the BYU Anthropology Department (2010-2016), popped in to correct me.

Charles' comment
โ€œSomeโ€ members, not โ€œmostโ€ members believe the Mesoamerican theory. And the percentage is dropping. I taught at BYU for many years, and can attest to this from surveys.
My response
Many members might not believe the Mesoamerican limited geography theory but most members certainly believe the Nephites are ancestors of the Maya. Any time the church illustrates the cities the Nephites lived in they are clearly modelled on Mayan cities.
To which Charles responded.
Not certainly most of the thousands of students I instructed as Chair of the Anthropology Department. How preposterous. Mayans, indeed!

:lol: :lol: :lol:

No wonder FARMS and the apologetic dribble they produced was shut down. The Head of the Anthropology Department thought its "research" was "preposterous".

The offending Facebook post

๐—ช๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ, ๐˜„๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ, ๐˜„๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ, ๐˜„๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€: ๐—›๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐——๐—”๐—ฅ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—•๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ธ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐— ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ป
LIDAR technology has revolutionised Mesoamerican archaeology by revealing massive, hidden pre-Columbian cities, fortifications, and causeways, particularly in the Maya region. Mormon apologists have argued these discoveries add further support for the Book of Mormon. They donโ€™t.

๐—™๐—”๐—–๐—ง: ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐——๐—”๐—ฅ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜† ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—•๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ธ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐— ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—บ๐˜€ ๐— ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ด๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ณ ๐—ฎ ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜†.

๐—๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ต ๐—ฆ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ฎ ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ก๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜€
In 1842 Joseph Smith claimed the "wonderful ruins of Palenque (Chiapas, Mexico) are among the mighty works of the Nephitesโ€. Ever since, most members have believed that the Nephites are the ancestors of the Maya. Mormon apologists have even gone as far as claiming that the city of Kaminaljuyu (see map), which lies under Guatemala City in the highlands of Guatemala, is the city of Nephi, established in about 550 BCE (2 Nephi 5: 11-15).

๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐——๐—”๐—ฅ?
LIDAR is a remote sensing technology that uses pulsed laser light to create highly accurate, three-dimensional models of environments. It has revolutionised Mesoamerican archaeology by piercing thick vegetation to reveal thousands of man-made structures such as buildings, elevated ceremonial structures and causeways. LIDAR is especially good at detecting the oldest remains of ancient civilisations that have been eroded by exposure to the elements for millennia and been buried by vegetation.

๐—›๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐——๐—”๐—ฅ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐— ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—บ๐˜€
๐™’๐™ง๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐™ฅ๐™ก๐™–๐™˜๐™š, ๐™ฌ๐™ง๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ข๐™š
During the latter half of the 20th century, the highland Maya city Kaminaljuyu was considered the birthplace of the Maya civilisation. It was the largest city in the Maya highlands and expanded rapidly in about 400 BCE. John Sorenson latched onto this now outdated science and claimed the Nephites were responsible for this accelerated development. Kaminaljuyu is also much closer to the western coast of Central America, where Lehi is supposed to have landed.

LIDAR has helped reveal that there are many much older Maya cities in the lowlands such as Cival, Ceival, Nakbe and Yaxnohcah (see map) that were established by around 800 BCE. The oldest Maya site is at Aguada Fรฉnix, which is located in the Mexican state of Tabasco. It dates to about 1000 BCE. The site contains a sprawling ceremonial centre a mile long (1.4km long and 400m wide).
https://www.sciencealert.com/largest-and-oldest-maya...
The Maya civilisation was clearly very well established and thriving four to five centuries BEFORE the family of Lehi are claimed to have arrived in the Americas.

๐™’๐™ง๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐™˜๐™ž๐™ซ๐™ž๐™ก๐™ž๐™จ๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ
Leading LDS apologists, Hugh Nibley and John Sorenson, have drawn extensive parallels between the Jaredites (who inhabited the land northward) and the Olmec civilization and between the descendants of Lehi (who inhabited the land southward) and the Maya. However, the Book of Mormon records no interactions between the Nephites and the Jaredite civilization. In fact, the Nephites only learned about the Jaredites (which had collapsed in a final war of annihilation around 400 BCE) when they encountered the Mulekites in about 130 BCE. So clearly, according to the Book of Mormon, the Nephites knew nothing at all about the Jaredites.

Discoveries in the last 15 years, largely thanks to LIDAR, have shown the Olmec and the Maya were intimately connected. There is compelling evidence that all civilisations in southern Mexico, including the Maya, rested on an Olmec base. They shared religious ideologies, monumental architecture, cultivation of maize, the sacred ball game, artistic mastery of jade, and they traded extensively in commodities such as obsidian, jade, rubber, and cacao. The Maya refined Olmec innovations in writing, astronomy, and calendrical systems and established the most complex civilization in pre-Columbian America. There is also no evidence of a cataclysmic Olmec collapse around 400 BCE, rather, they were gradually succeeded by the smaller Epi-Olmec cultures which flourished along the Gulf Coast of Mexico (mainly Veracruz) until 250 CE.
(See Coe, Michael D. Javier Urcid and Rex Koontz. Mexico: From the Olmecs to the Aztecs 8th Edition, Thames & Hudson, 2019 and Coe, Michael D., and Stephen D. Houston. 2015. The Maya. 9th ed. London: Thames & Hudson.)

The geographic proximity of Aguada Fรฉnix, the oldest Maya centre, close to prominent Olmec centres like La Venta and San Lorenzo (see map) reinforces the connection between these two ancient civilizations. For several hundred years these centres coexisted and undoubtedly traded and had extensive interactions. There is a large ceremonial mound at San Lorenzo that shares many of the features of the mound at Aguada Fรฉnix. There can be no doubt that the Olmec and Maya were well aware of each other.

๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—น๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป
Many LIDAR-enabled scientific discoveries in the last 15 years have exposed anachronisms in Book of Mormon apologetics that BYU has churned out for over half a century. The Maya and Olmec civilisation have nothing to do with the Book of Mormon. They were intimately connected and thrived at the wrong time and place to fit the Book of Mormon narrative.
We already know from extensive mitochondrial DNA studies on dozens of Maya populations and over 1,500 ancient and modern individuals that the Maya do not have ancient Middle Eastern ancestors. Scientists have also scoured their genomes and they have also failed to find Middle Eastern DNA. See https://www.reddit.com/r/exmormon/comme ... erated_in/

Itโ€™s about time Mormons left the Maya alone and stopped making these racist and outdated claims.

Image
Last edited by simon southerton on Sat Jul 04, 2026 1:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
huckelberry
God
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:48 pm

Re: Former Head of BYU Anthropology Department thinks Mesoamerican LG theory is "preposterous"

Post by huckelberry »

Simon, thank you for the careful connecting of current information to the Book of Mormon question. It does make me wonder how this fellow views the book. Willing to see it as fiction?
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 8768
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Re: Former Head of BYU Anthropology Department thinks Mesoamerican LG theory is "preposterous"

Post by Shulem »

All this is evidence and proof that demostrates through the power of science how the Book of Mormon is pure fiction that was invented through the instrumentality of primitive 19th century man-thinking.

Mormons are like barbaric hairy apes rolling about on a defunct skating rink. They need to drag their sorry asses out of the 70's and get with the program!

:lol:

Scew-u, Mormons!

Them damn dirty apes.
User avatar
Tom
God
Posts: 1145
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:41 pm
Location: Sego, Utah
Contact:

Re: Former Head of BYU Anthropology Department thinks Mesoamerican LG theory is "preposterous"

Post by Tom »

simon southerton wrote: โ†‘
Fri Jul 03, 2026 5:55 am
G'day comrades,
Long time no post.

Thought some of you might get a chuckle out of this.

A few days ago I posted (see below) about recent archeological discoveries in Mesoamerica that have exposed anachronisms in the Limited Geography Theory espoused by John Sorenson and his sycophants (Peterson, Midgley, Givens, Bushman etc). As you all know these gentlemen have pinned most of there hopes on the pre-classic Maya.

Many of the latest discoveries were made possible by the use of LIDAR, which is particularly good at revealing the oldest man-made structures of the Maya. I made the claim that most Mormons believed the Nephites were the ancestors of the Maya since that what Joseph Smith believed. Mormon apologists have been hooked on the Maya since Nibley.

I was very surprised when Charles Nuckolls, the former head of the BYU Anthropology Department (2010-2016), popped in to correct me.

Charles' comment
โ€œSomeโ€ members, not โ€œmostโ€ members believe the Mesoamerican theory. And the percentage is dropping. I taught at BYU for many years, and can attest to this from surveys.
I would be interested in learning more about the surveys, including what questions were asked and who took the surveys. Were these students in introductory anthropology courses or upper-level anthropology courses?
drumdude
God
Posts: 7989
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: Former Head of BYU Anthropology Department thinks Mesoamerican LG theory is "preposterous"

Post by drumdude »

As Carl Sagan famously pointed out: If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

All the speculation about Book of Mormon geography is meaningless until you have one shred of evidence to support a historical Book of Mormon.

There simply are none. Thatโ€™s what Dan spends so much time talking about physical plates. Gold, lead or otherwise. Itโ€™s all theyโ€™ve got, and itโ€™s not impressive to anyone but active Mormons.

You may as well debate which specific British Isle Hogwarts was situated on. Or which star the aliens that built the pyramids came from.
simon southerton
Sunbeam
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2020 11:15 pm

Re: Former Head of BYU Anthropology Department thinks Mesoamerican LG theory is "preposterous"

Post by simon southerton »

I would be interested in learning more about the surveys, including what questions were asked and who took the surveys. Were these students in introductory anthropology courses or upper-level anthropology courses?
They were certainly not your typical run of the mill Mormon. So his conclusions are a stretch.

Nuckolls seemed absolutely certain that most Mormons do not associate the Maya with the Nephites. Interestingly, Jasmin Rappleye did a survey a few months ago that gives us a pretty clear view of what ordinary members believe. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvIh3_J3-b0

She asked her followers where they thought the Book of Mormon occurred. A total of 4,658 people responded to the survey, so its a sizeable data set. There may be a slight bias away from Meldrum's Heartland pseudoscience because most of his followers are retired and less likely to be followers of Jasmin.

North America .......16%
Central America.......33%
ALL America..............44%
South America..........7%


Clearly, if you believe the events of the Book of Mormon took place over the entire continent or in Central America (77%) then you probably believe the Nephites were ancestors of the Maya, just like Joseph Smith did.
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 8768
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Re: Former Head of BYU Anthropology Department thinks Mesoamerican LG theory is "preposterous"

Post by Shulem »

simon southerton wrote: โ†‘
Sat Jul 04, 2026 1:13 am
She asked her followers where they thought the Book of Mormon occurred. A total of 4,658 people responded to the survey, so its a sizeable data set. There may be a slight bias away from Meldrum's Heartland pseudoscience because most of his followers are retired and less likely to be followers of Jasmin.

North America .......16%
Central America.......33%
ALL America..............44%
South America..........7%


Clearly, if you believe the events of the Book of Mormon took place over the entire continent or in Central America (77%) then you probably believe the Nephites were ancestors of the Maya, just like Joseph Smith did.

Jas-baby said her question was: Where do you believe the Book of Mormon primarily took place?

That is kind of a loaded question and it doesn't really target what she was looking for. Church members (44%) who expressed belief in ALL America may have been thinking of a broader perspective over time -- meaning a micro area grew into a macro area. Joseph Smith favored the macro area later in his ministry which was aligned with what the Pratts originally thought in claiming that Lehi landed in South America. But Smith never confirmed that. Most Book of Mormon enthusiasts are well aware how the text defines a micro area (limited geography) and it seems the largest divide in the church today is between the dumb-Heartlanders and idiot-Mesoamericans. The church is a house divided among itself and a house divided cannot stand! They are led by self-proclaimed prophets who refuse to take a stand and get a revelation for the members who are warring against each other! Mormonism is at war with itself.

Jas-baby should have simply asked: Where do you believe the Narrow Neck of Land was located and provide the appropriate choices in which to check the box. My pick:

[x] Delmarva
Fence Sitter
Area Authority
Posts: 630
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:02 am

Re: Former Head of BYU Anthropology Department thinks Mesoamerican LG theory is "preposterous"

Post by Fence Sitter »

Thanks for dropping in Simon, and keep up the good work.

The Book of Mormon took place in Smith's mind, so situating it anywhere is just a Texas Sharpshooter fallacy.
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 8768
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Re: Former Head of BYU Anthropology Department thinks Mesoamerican LG theory is "preposterous"

Post by Shulem »

Fence Sitter wrote: โ†‘
Sat Jul 04, 2026 2:58 pm
The Book of Mormon took place in Smith's mind...

That it did!

Comments from Jas-baby's comments section:
@Wilton-gb3jf wrote:I personally believe it took place inside Joseph's hat...
@rickyricky4738 wrote:In joseph smith mind
@LouRussell-k3y9 wrote:It took place in Joseph Smith mind. Total b.s.
@rayfann7860 wrote:I'm going to say none of the above
@CaliforniaKid1979 wrote:The Church takes no official position. Should be a clue...
It all took place in Joseph's mind.
@jonathangarrison1429 wrote:There is zero evidence of the Book of Mormon. It took place in the mind of young Joseph Smith.
@joselucasbadue7608 wrote:Nowhere. It was all made up by Joseph Smith, the consummate trickster.
@chrisazure1624 wrote:You left out the real option. Myth.
@elenarezuchova5649 wrote:It took place nowhere. It's made.up
@BenMyers72 wrote:None of it happened. Full stop.
@coachmarc2002 wrote:The events in the Book of Mormon didnโ€™t in fact take place at all. Correction: they took place in the imagination of Joseph Smith.
@oliverdownunder9397 wrote:The geography of this fake book cannot be put down anywhere because it doesnโ€™t exist.
@margaretbillings85 wrote:The events of the Book of Mormon took place in Joseph Smithโ€™s head.
@sdfotodude wrote:It took place in Joseph's imagination
@jasper199 wrote:There is a really good reason that there is no consensus on this topic. It's because it is all made up BS. No DNA. No archeological findings. Just mental gymnastics and circular arguments. You should have included a 5th option that it occurred nowhere.
:lol:
simon southerton
Sunbeam
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2020 11:15 pm

Re: Former Head of BYU Anthropology Department thinks Mesoamerican LG theory is "preposterous"

Post by simon southerton »

Shulem said:
Most Book of Mormon enthusiasts are well aware how the text defines a micro area (limited geography) and it seems the largest divide in the church today is between the dumb-Heartlanders and idiot-Mesoamericans.
That divide is between such a small group of "enthusiasts". Very few ordinary members believe in any form of limited geography, as in the whole Lehite story from landing to burial of the plates, took place in a small geographical region. Even the North American nutters have to accept that the God speaking to Joseph Smith (insert multiple D&C quotes here) thought the "Indians" living all across North America were Lamanites.

Itโ€™s interesting that 33% of Jasmin respondents believed the events took place in Central America. I doubt many of these folk believe the Sorenson nonsense of the plates being hauled all the way up to New York. I suspect most donโ€™t care enough about geography to tie up all the loose ends.
Last edited by simon southerton on Sun Jul 05, 2026 1:07 am, edited 2 times in total.
Post Reply