The First Plastic First Family

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
_MeDotOrg
_Emeritus
Posts: 4761
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 11:29 pm

Re: The First Plastic First Family

Post by _MeDotOrg »

Some Schmo wrote:
MeDotOrg wrote:Thou shalt level thy criticisms against the President.
Unless involved in his business or politics, thou shalt leave his family out of it.

On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.

The problem is that he has involved his family in the politics. They're intertwined by virtue of the fact that he's handed them his companies while taking office. It's unconstitutional.


I have no truck with anyone who wants to go after Eric or Don Jr. or Ivanka or Jared about what they're doing to the country, or the horrible conflicts of interest they constantly present.

If Chelsea Clinton had plastic surgery, should Republicans have been talking about that if Hillary Clinton won?

The Trump administration is a target-rich environment with respect to criticizing politics and family ties to business and politics. It's my golden rule in politics: What's good for the goose is good for the gander. If you want to talk about hawking geegaws to enrich yourself vis a vis a post-election TV show, fine. Rip all the ones who did a new one.

Surgery isn't a conflict of interest crime.
"The great problem of any civilization is how to rejuvenate itself without rebarbarization."
- Will Durant
"We've kept more promises than we've even made"
- Donald Trump
"Of what meaning is the world without mind? The question cannot exist."
- Edwin Land
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Re: The First Plastic First Family

Post by _Some Schmo »

Jersey Girl wrote:There are probably as many reasons for cosmetic surgery and the way we change our "look" as there are patients and people.

Yep. That's likely true.

MeDotOrg wrote:Surgery isn't a conflict of interest crime.

Absolutely. I didn't intend to imply that.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: The First Plastic First Family

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Some Schmo wrote:The problem is that he has involved his family in the politics. They're intertwined by virtue of the fact that he's handed them his companies while taking office. It's unconstitutional.

To whom else should he have handed his companies while he devotes his time to the Presidency?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Kevin Graham
_Emeritus
Posts: 13037
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm

Re: The First Plastic First Family

Post by _Kevin Graham »

Dr. Shades wrote:
Some Schmo wrote:The problem is that he has involved his family in the politics. They're intertwined by virtue of the fact that he's handed them his companies while taking office. It's unconstitutional.

To whom else should he have handed his companies while he devotes his time to the Presidency?


That's his problem. The man talks about how much he's sacrificed and he can't even sacrifice his businesses for the greater good of being President eh? No, it is all about stroking his ego.
_Maksutov
_Emeritus
Posts: 12480
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:19 pm

Re: The First Plastic First Family

Post by _Maksutov »

MeDotOrg wrote:
Some Schmo wrote:The problem is that he has involved his family in the politics. They're intertwined by virtue of the fact that he's handed them his companies while taking office. It's unconstitutional.


I have no truck with anyone who wants to go after Eric or Don Jr. or Ivanka or Jared about what they're doing to the country, or the horrible conflicts of interest they constantly present.

If Chelsea Clinton had plastic surgery, should Republicans have been talking about that if Hillary Clinton won?

The Trump administration is a target-rich environment with respect to criticizing politics and family ties to business and politics. It's my golden rule in politics: What's good for the goose is good for the gander. If you want to talk about hawking geegaws to enrich yourself vis a vis a post-election TV show, fine. Rip all the ones who did a new one.

Surgery isn't a conflict of interest crime.


Yeah, let's talk about emoluments.
"God" is the original deus ex machina. --Maksutov
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: The First Plastic First Family

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Kevin Graham wrote:
Dr. Shades wrote:To whom else should he have handed his companies while he devotes his time to the Presidency?

That's his problem. The man talks about how much he's sacrificed and he can't even sacrifice his businesses for the greater good of being President eh? No, it is all about stroking his ego.

He IS sacrificing his businesses for the greater good of being President, isn't he?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Kevin Graham
_Emeritus
Posts: 13037
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm

Re: The First Plastic First Family

Post by _Kevin Graham »

Dr. Shades wrote:He IS sacrificing his businesses for the greater good of being President, isn't he?

Obviously he isn't sacrificing anything. How do you think he is? He's going to be making millions because of his Presidency. The concept of conflict of interest doesn't apply to Trump. He's already violated the emoluments clause of the constitution and because we have a blind Republican Congress, nothing is getting done about that. And "greater good" and Trump aren't words that should ever go together. Kinda like "Grandpa... naked."
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Re: The First Plastic First Family

Post by _Some Schmo »

Dr. Shades wrote:[He IS sacrificing his businesses for the greater good of being President, isn't he?

Shades, you did see the thread on the fake props for his infomercial... er, press conference, didn't you? The one where he said he was handing his businesses over to his sons?

Honestly. Are you trying to tell us you don't realize this guy has no concern over American interests? That he's doing this only for his fragile ego and to line his pockets?

For a guy so worried about how people write, you don't seem to notice much of what they write.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_Res Ipsa
_Emeritus
Posts: 10274
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:37 pm

Re: The First Plastic First Family

Post by _Res Ipsa »

Dr. Shades wrote:
Some Schmo wrote:The problem is that he has involved his family in the politics. They're intertwined by virtue of the fact that he's handed them his companies while taking office. It's unconstitutional.

To whom else should he have handed his companies while he devotes his time to the Presidency?

I think EA addressed this in another thread. If he wants to be president, he should sell his businesses and put the money in a blind trust. The fact that that's a sacrifice for him isn't a reason to have to put up with a president who uses the office of the President as a profit seeking venture. Just as an example, Trump declared Mar a Lago his "winter white house." Then Mar a Lago doubled it's membership fees. Who profits? Trump.

His businesses are trying to profit off his status by tripling the number of Trump hotels in the U.S. during his presidency. Who profits? Trump.

It's public service. Not public profit.

by the way, last I saw that anyone looked, Trump still hadn't done the paperwork to even transfer his business interests. As of Inauguration Day, none of the required paperwork had been filed.

Dr. Shades wrote:He IS sacrificing his businesses for the greater good of being President, isn't he?

We can't really tell, can we, without seeing the paperwork. You think we're going to get to see that? He may be giving up income and control for four years, but his kids will have control. And then in four years, he can have them back. In the meantime, because he knows what his businesses are, he can funnel money to them like all good banana republic dictators do. We saw him orchestrate his campaign to funnel money to his businesses. Why should we expect him to do anything different now?
​“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”

― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: The First Plastic First Family

Post by _Jersey Girl »

MeDotOrg wrote:If Chelsea Clinton had plastic surgery, should Republicans have been talking about that if Hillary Clinton won?

She did. She had rhinoplasty. Was that an issue during the campaign? Was cosmetic procedures brought up at all by anyone during the campaign?

How does this matter?

It doesn't.

Res Ipsa wrote: Just as an example, Trump declared Mar a Lago his "winter white house." Then Mar a Lago doubled it's membership fees. Who profits? Trump.

Baby steps. Explain to me how raising the membership fees of Mar a Lago have anything to do with him declaring it his winter white house?

Tell me why you think that?

Some Schmo wrote:
Dr. Shades wrote:[He IS sacrificing his businesses for the greater good of being President, isn't he?

Shades, you did see the thread on the fake props for his infomercial... er, press conference, didn't you? The one where he said he was handing his businesses over to his sons?

Honestly. Are you trying to tell us you don't realize this guy has no concern over American interests? That he's doing this only for his fragile ego and to line his pockets?

For a guy so worried about how people write, you don't seem to notice much of what they write.

Tell me what evidence there is that the folders were empty or the papers were blank. I've seen the assertion, I haven't seen the evidence that supports it.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Post Reply