Kevin Graham wrote:== If it is important enough for you to find out for sure, you will have to check there yourself since I have been banned there by Kevin in an unoriginal way and for unoriginal reasons.
I beg to differ. I doubt anyone else has ever been banned from FAIR or ZLMB for stupidity.
That's as original as can be.
Strange...that is not exactly what you said earlier here, and certainly not what Liz here told me was the reason.
But, I suppose it does depend upon what the respective mods consider as "stupid". In your case, "stupid" evidently means "anyone who cares enough about you to undertake the arduous task of demonstrating indisputably to your closed and self-protective mind that you were clearly wrong on quite a few of your perception about what I had said." Being proven wrong is loathsome enough for you and entirely unacceptable to your mind, let alone being forced by the power of careful, maticulous, and self-evident reasoning to accept that you were wrong many times over. To your mind, it would be "stupid" to let that happen. So, on several levels, I can see how "stupidity" was your reason--or at least the reason you need to suggest in order to avoid being confronted with the unacceptable truth.
The mods at FAIR, on the other hand, might consider it "stupid" for someone with your unflattering reputation to boast that a respected and valued scholar was "fabricating" reasons to close off a public conversation.
They might have thought it "stupid" for you to, in your typically belligerent, reactionary, accusatory, misunderstanding and misrepresentative way, badger them.
Then, too, the mods at FAIR and ZLMB may have considered it "stupid" for you to do all the inane and uncivil things you have done over the years to get booted or queued as many times as you have on both boards, and they may have thought the same thing about me and others who have likewise been banned and queued multiple times.
They may think it "stupid" that you just don't get this, and likely never will--particularly now that you closed off the one remaining avenue that could help you gain congnition (i.e. me).
So, it's questionable whether that is an "original" reason or not.
Even still, it is unoriginal to ban people regardless of the reason. It happens all the time--as you well know.
Thanks, -Wade Englund-