Dr. Shades wrote:When Paul Osborne first showed up here, he started a thread titled "[Jerald] Tanner is Burning in Hell." This prompted lots of people to label him a fanatic and state that if people like him represented hardcore Mormonism, they were glad to be out of it.
I have a slightly different take on it. I like Paul Osborne quite a bit since he represents, in my opinion, true Mormonism, the kind of Chapel Mormonism I grew up with. The kind of Mormon who boldly declares what he believes to be the truth, consequences and political correctness be damned. None of this watered-down, wishy-washy reactive Internet Mormonism stuff.
Early on in his FAIRboards career, he called FARMS to repentance for rejecting the words of the prophets. This, of course, put him on the wrong side of the FAIR moderators who, as we know, love to coddle their FARMS participants. But let's face it--how can you not like a guy with the guts to call FARMS to repentance, of all things?
Often people complain that figuring out Mormon doctrine is like trying to nail Jell-O to a wall. Not with Paul Osborne. You always know exactly where he stands with things, none of that "it was only his opinion" crap.
What do y'all think of this and, by extension, Paul Osborne? Am I up in the night, or do I have a point?
Dr. Shades,
I concur with your assessment. Although I’m a bit of a maverick and highly unpredictable in my mood/behavior, there is no doubt in my mind that the doctrine I express is sound and Mormon through and through.
For those LDS who disagree with me about this – they will find out later they were being foolish and don’t know their scriptures/religion very well.
Paul O